[24]7 Assist vs. Lifesize CxEngage

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
[24]7 Assist
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
[24]7 Assist call center agent to best serve customers across digital and voice engagements. Assist includes three options: Digital Assist Assist Widget for CRM Active Share Digital Assist is a unified, AI-powered agent console for messaging apps and chat interactions. Assist Widget for CRM provides native and custom connectors to embed Digital Assist into your customer relationship management (CRM) and enterprise systems for a holistic view of…N/A
Lifesize CxEngage
Score 7.8 out of 10
N/A
CxEngage is a cloud contact center solution designed to meet users' needs and work in their environment. Unlike monolithic architectures and on-premises solutions, CxEngage is a ‘born-in-the-cloud’ platform to deliver unified visibility across voice, video, and digital channels. CxEngage is designed to just work anywhere, and to be implemented in a few days or weeks.
$85
per month per user
Pricing
[24]7 AssistLifesize CxEngage
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
[24]7 AssistLifesize CxEngage
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
[24]7 AssistLifesize CxEngage
Contact Center Software
Comparison of Contact Center Software features of Product A and Product B
[24]7 Assist
-
Ratings
Lifesize CxEngage
6.9
2 Ratings
19% below category average
Agent dashboard00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Outbound response00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Call forwarding00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
Interactive voice response00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
REST APIs00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
Call tracking00 Ratings7.72 Ratings
Multichannel integration00 Ratings6.42 Ratings
CRM software integration00 Ratings6.41 Ratings
Workforce Optimization (WFO)
Comparison of Workforce Optimization (WFO) features of Product A and Product B
[24]7 Assist
-
Ratings
Lifesize CxEngage
7.0
2 Ratings
16% below category average
Inbound call routing00 Ratings7.32 Ratings
Recording00 Ratings8.62 Ratings
Call analytics00 Ratings6.82 Ratings
Historical reporting00 Ratings5.92 Ratings
Live reporting00 Ratings6.42 Ratings
Customer interaction analytics00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Best Alternatives
[24]7 AssistLifesize CxEngage
Small Businesses
8x8 Contact Center
8x8 Contact Center
Score 7.7 out of 10
CloudTalk
CloudTalk
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Playvox
Playvox
Score 9.3 out of 10
Bright Pattern Contact Center
Bright Pattern Contact Center
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Playvox
Playvox
Score 9.3 out of 10
Google Cloud Contact Center AI
Google Cloud Contact Center AI
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
[24]7 AssistLifesize CxEngage
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(1 ratings)
7.7
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
[24]7 AssistLifesize CxEngage
Likelihood to Recommend
[24]7.ai
It is well suited to companies who have large numbers of Inbound-Outbound call traffic. And where the number of agents handling such calls is very large (>10,000). For companies having less call traffic, this solution won't be cost-effective. Also, it is appropriate for companies looking to improve their CSAT score.
Read full review
Lifesize
CxEngage can handle some more complex flow options that other vendors don't seem to be able to do. The integration for voice calls with Salesforce is a huge plus. The integration of email support with Salesforce is a BIG miss. After fighting with it for a year, we finally just turned it off and use Salesforce Omnichannel for email support. Chat using Salesforce Live Agent worked fine enough.
Read full review
Pros
[24]7.ai
  • It supports chat & multiple messaging channel interactions from a single terminal
  • Native & Custom integrations enable embedding widgets into the existing CRM systems
Read full review
Lifesize
  • Great flexibility working with flow creation and editing
  • Great support staff
  • Good overall package for workforce management and quality monitoring
  • Integrates well with our tools.
Read full review
Cons
[24]7.ai
  • The User Interface can be improved & made to look much more contemporary & next-gen
  • Implementation can be made more simpler
  • Training & Troubleshooting knowledge transfer can be improved
Read full review
Lifesize
  • Stronger support and more reliable system for users not on a commercial network
  • Consumer friendly and intuitive reporting and dashboard tools. build canned reports
  • Reporting: Ability to get a combined SVL for all queues included on a report (now we manually calculate after exporting the report into excel). Same for all major data points (ASA, AHT, etc.)
  • Ability to include abandoned calls and an abandonment percentage which excludes short abandons on the Queue summary report. Now the report just shows total abandons and abandonment percentage so if we want to exclude short abandons we have to pull a separate report to find out how many calls abandoned in less than 10 seconds then calculate the "true abandoned number" (calls abandoned minus short abandons)
  • Ability to change what is considered a "short abandon" and then report on it. Right now the only option is the built in tracking of calls that abandoned in equal to or less than 10 seconds.
  • Ability to "save" an agents "default" skill profile so that any changes we make can be returned to "BAU" with a click of a button
  • quicker data/historical report retrieval
  • way to separate what we have listed as a queue name for reporting vs. what is used for the queue name in the "whisper" (the issue we had with WT queue naming conventions because we had to have the whisper be super precise)
Read full review
Implementation Rating
[24]7.ai
No answers on this topic
Lifesize
We implemented in 2018 and were only given 8 weeks to do it...as per the direction of our parent company at the time. Serenova at the time responded well and we were able to go Live within 8-weeks...albeit the product overall was a big change and had gaps in features over our previous contact management solution.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
[24]7.ai
[24]7 Assist offers better value for money & much higher level of customization as compared to other solutions. The AI feature works well & the integration with existing CRM is very smooth. Unified desktop interactions for chat & multiple channel messaging are very effective features of the solution & enable agent interaction much more fructified.
Read full review
Lifesize
It's been too many years...I don't remember. Except in 2021 we looked briefly at Amazon and Salesforce call center offerings. Both were too basic at the time that even if we got a great deal on licensing (we are a Salesforce house for other things), we couldn't easily (or at all) do things like Callbacks and some of the more robust flow buildouts that we have in place today with Lifesize.
Read full review
Return on Investment
[24]7.ai
  • Improved CSAT score
  • Operating cost saving up to 30%
  • Better Customer engagement & 20% more lead conversion
Read full review
Lifesize
  • lower operational costs
  • improved agent productivity
  • improved flexibility in design and admin work
Read full review
ScreenShots

Lifesize CxEngage Screenshots

Screenshot of Agent Interface - SFDC Integrated AgentScreenshot of Agent Interface - Skylight Desktop Chat InteractionScreenshot of Agent Interface - Skylight Mockup 1Screenshot of Agent Interface - Skylight Mockup 2Screenshot of Chat - Mockup 1Screenshot of Chat - Mockup 2