ABBYY FlexiCapture vs. Hyland Document Filters

It is well suited for unstructured documents and automates the scanning operations where users are scanning thousands of documents on a daily basis and process them in the existing line of business application, or it is well suited for the RPA operations where ABBYY FlexiCapture extracts the output of extracted data in Excel, CSV or XML, and RPA applications parse those data and take it into other applications.

Incentivized

It is well suited for receiving and identifying documents, types, and file formats. It does a great job of allowing us to automate the processing of documents that we receive digitally. It is a great tool and reduces the manual processing involved in identifying and organizing documents that we receive.

• Integration with workflow tolls
• Auto data extraction
• Business rule setup

Incentivized

• Identifies document types
• Identifies document formats
• Makes tiring and indexing our documents easier and reduces manual processing.

• Although the back-end of the application is very strong, if it can have a visual workflow for defining tasks like scanning, verification and etc., it will be better.
• Reporting feature should be enhance more on web
• Although the result of Arabic Text extraction is very good in ABBYY, if they can focus more on different types of Arabic Fonts, it will be better

Incentivized

• All of Hylands products are great they are a leader in document management.

License is cheap w.r.t to IQ BOT More flexibility in terms of custom development Can be used as independent process

Incentivized

• It has eased the scanning operation and reduced the overall time
• Automatic indexing created the good impacted on ROI
• But it only required the specialized IT Admin to maintain the system

Incentivized

• Makes a large amount of scanned material searchable.
• Allows us to easily find relevant documents.
• Easy to use and configure.