ABBYY FlexiCapture vs. Nitro Productivity Suite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ABBYY FlexiCapture
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
ABBYY FlexiCapture is an Intelligent Document Processing platform that aims to bring together NLP, machine learning, and recognition capabilities into a single, enterprise-scale platform to handle every type of document, from simple forms to complex free-form documents, and every job size, from ad hoc single documents to large batch jobs requiring tough SLAs. Orchestrating the process from acquisition to delivery, FlexiCapture feeds content-driven business applications such as RPA and BPM, to…
$29.99
per month
Nitro Productivity Suite
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Nitro Productivity Suite combines electronic signature and general PDF editing, from Nitro, Inc. It is built around capabilities such as getting approvals and esignatures in seconds and sharing and reviewing documents from anywhere.
$9.99
per month per user
Pricing
ABBYY FlexiCaptureNitro Productivity Suite
Editions & Modules
500 Pages
$29.99
per month
2,000 Pages
$99.99
per month
5,000 Pages
$199.99
per month
10,000 Pages
$299.99
per month
Nitro Sign® Essentials
$9.99
per month billed annually per user
Nitro Sign® Advanced
$19.99
per month billed annually per user
Nitro Sign® Premium
Let's chat
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ABBYY FlexiCaptureNitro Productivity Suite
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ABBYY FlexiCaptureNitro Productivity Suite
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
ABBYY FlexiCaptureNitro Productivity Suite
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
PDFfiller
PDFfiller
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation
Score 9.1 out of 10
Adobe Acrobat Sign
Adobe Acrobat Sign
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ABBYY FlexiCaptureNitro Productivity Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
7.7
(2 ratings)
7.7
(14 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.2
(3 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
ABBYY FlexiCaptureNitro Productivity Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
ABBYY
It is well suited for unstructured documents and automates the scanning operations where users are scanning thousands of documents on a daily basis and process them in the existing line of business application, or it is well suited for the RPA operations where ABBYY FlexiCapture extracts the output of extracted data in Excel, CSV or XML, and RPA applications parse those data and take it into other applications.
Read full review
Nitro, Inc
Being a Nonprofit organization that produces a lot of publications on various projects, NPS allows us to create, edit and convert documents to suit the needs of our International Donor Partners and other stakeholders. In my own experience using this software, it is used less in our finance department since most of our documents originate from our accounting system and hence there is limited need for PDF management internally.
Read full review
Pros
ABBYY
  • Integration with workflow tolls
  • Auto data extraction
  • Business rule setup
Read full review
Nitro, Inc
  • Ability to combine files SEAMLESSLY and order them around as necessary (so underrated)
  • Signing not only for yourself but for others. Helpful for those who have been granted the authority to sign for VPs and directors
  • Much easier to use than some other PDF viewing services
Read full review
Cons
ABBYY
  • Although the back-end of the application is very strong, if it can have a visual workflow for defining tasks like scanning, verification and etc., it will be better.
  • Reporting feature should be enhance more on web
  • Although the result of Arabic Text extraction is very good in ABBYY, if they can focus more on different types of Arabic Fonts, it will be better
Read full review
Nitro, Inc
  • The font choices could be better and more robust.
  • Sometimes converting PDF documents to MS Word has formatting problems, like with some tables.
  • Converting MS Word to PDF can be slow sometimes, meaning it is faster to save the MS Word document as a PDF than selecting the file for conversion using the Nitro PDF convert option.
Read full review
Usability
ABBYY
No answers on this topic
Nitro, Inc
It's quick and easy to use for all users.
Read full review
Performance
ABBYY
No answers on this topic
Nitro, Inc
It works as advertised.
Read full review
Support Rating
ABBYY
No answers on this topic
Nitro, Inc
Nitro checks all the boxes for what we need. It is fairly priced, it allows us to read and edit PDF documents, convert PDF to MS Word and convert MS Word to PDF. It allows us to combine multiple files and do all the post processing like adding page numbers and adding headers and footers
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
ABBYY
License is cheap w.r.t to IQ BOT More flexibility in terms of custom development Can be used as independent process
Read full review
Nitro, Inc
Every 1-2 years will do a check on current PDF options to include trialing the software. Have tried Foxit and several that seem to have failed in the marketplace. Over the last 4 years, I have always stuck with Nitro. Unfortunately, we still need to keep Adobe Acrobat (free version) installed to view a small percentage of some PDFs we receive.
Read full review
Return on Investment
ABBYY
  • It has eased the scanning operation and reduced the overall time
  • Automatic indexing created the good impacted on ROI
  • But it only required the specialized IT Admin to maintain the system
Read full review
Nitro, Inc
  • ROI was very quick as the license costs were so low. We purchased 8 licenses versus the initial 2 we were planning on for Adobe.
  • More people were able to use the product than we initially thought due to low purchase costs.
  • We haven't had any further costs to own the product after the initial purchase. We would need to purchase new licenses if we wanted to upgrade.
Read full review
ScreenShots