MIP Fund Accounting vs. Thomson Reuters CS Professional Suite

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
MIP Fund Accounting
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
MIP Fund Accounting™ is a configurable fund accounting solution. The solution includes functionality for fund accounting, procurement, budgeting, payroll, human resources, timekeeping, fixed asset management, grant management, and dashboards for nonprofits and government agencies.N/A
Thomson Reuters CS Professional Suite
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Thomson Reuters CS Professional Suite is integrated tax and accounting software that manages the operations of legal firms. It is used to collect client data, and post finished tax returns, from managing client engagements to practice management.N/A
Pricing
MIP Fund AccountingThomson Reuters CS Professional Suite
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
MIP Fund AccountingThomson Reuters CS Professional Suite
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
MIP Fund AccountingThomson Reuters CS Professional Suite
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
MIP Fund AccountingThomson Reuters CS Professional Suite
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Thomson Reuters CS Professional Suite
10.0
1 Ratings
29% above category average
Pay calculation00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Thomson Reuters CS Professional Suite
8.5
1 Ratings
19% above category average
API for custom integration00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Plug-ins00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Thomson Reuters CS Professional Suite
8.2
4 Ratings
3% above category average
Single sign-on capability00 Ratings8.33 Ratings
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings8.14 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Thomson Reuters CS Professional Suite
7.2
4 Ratings
5% below category average
Dashboards00 Ratings8.13 Ratings
Standard reports00 Ratings8.04 Ratings
Custom reports00 Ratings5.64 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Thomson Reuters CS Professional Suite
8.6
4 Ratings
15% above category average
Accounts payable00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Accounts receivable00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Cash management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Bank reconciliation00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Expense management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Time tracking00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Fixed asset management00 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Multi-currency support00 Ratings7.12 Ratings
Multi-division support00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Regulations compliance00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Electronic tax filing00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Self-service portal00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Localizations00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Configurable Accounting00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Standardized Processes00 Ratings9.13 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
MIP Fund Accounting
-
Ratings
Thomson Reuters CS Professional Suite
10.0
1 Ratings
35% above category average
Location management00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
MIP Fund AccountingThomson Reuters CS Professional Suite
Small Businesses
QuickBooks Desktop Pro
QuickBooks Desktop Pro
Score 8.0 out of 10
Dext Prepare (with Receipt Bank)
Dext Prepare (with Receipt Bank)
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Sage Intacct
Sage Intacct
Score 8.7 out of 10
Accounting Seed
Accounting Seed
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Oracle Fusion Cloud ERP
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
MIP Fund AccountingThomson Reuters CS Professional Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
8.8
(430 ratings)
8.5
(4 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.2
(126 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.1
(100 ratings)
8.9
(2 ratings)
Availability
9.8
(15 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.5
(86 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
7.8
(99 ratings)
9.9
(2 ratings)
In-Person Training
10.0
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
8.3
(7 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
6.4
(28 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.6
(8 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
7.8
(13 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.7
(15 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.4
(13 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.1
(13 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
MIP Fund AccountingThomson Reuters CS Professional Suite
Likelihood to Recommend
Community Brands
I do like the check register, it is easy to access. It is also easy to access information for bank reconciliations but some entries are difficult and I have had ongoing issues with duplicated entries. Those situations coming at times when I am not really sure how I have duplicated an entry and they are somewhat intimidating. It is also somewhat difficult to delete or void erroneous entries or those that need to be otherwise corrected. I do understand that it is accounting software, but feel again that it could be a little bit more user friendly, at least from a fairly "new" user's standpoint!
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
It is extremely suitable for the client since for us they are all US-based companies, even though the main headquarters of our business is in Mexico.

It is less appropriate in terms of usability than taxes, since it does not include adaptability to Mexican legislation, and its deployment through customizations and reports is extremely expensive.
Read full review
Pros
Community Brands
  • General Ledger processing, including journal entries and reports
  • Ability to download all reports directly to Excel and PDF formats
  • Use of Grant codes to enable grant reporting by month/quarter/year
  • Ability to have multiple departments and consolidate into groups for reporting
  • Accounts Payable and Accounts Receivable cannot be out of balance
  • Multiple ways to use the product including Cloud and Classic options, Visual menu or Standard (Top of screen) menus to select processes, many options we are not using in our simple organization
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • Allows users to create associations, groups, locations, or property types to categorize each asset.
  • Fixed Assets CS can be deployed in a virtual office setting or as a SaaS application.
  • Fixed Assets CS also supports common depreciation methods.
Read full review
Cons
Community Brands
  • With the payroll process, if there is an error in sending the stubs through email, there is no option to resend without a restore. That really needs to change.
  • Being able to void encumbrance at the same time as a PO would be an incredible time saver.
  • When processing W2 the system deletes info.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • Requires a time investment for the learning curve to fully utilize the benefits provided by CS Professional Suite.
  • Older looking UI and aesthetic.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Community Brands
My company is pretty dug into our current day-to-day systems that serve our operations (ServTracker, Kantime, MicroMD). Without MIP Fund Accounting, we would have no choice but to figure out a way to consolidate those three accounting/operations programs into (ideally) one program, which is basically impossible if we want to salvage any historical data. MIP Fund Accounting is a great hub to bring all those pieces together in a palatable form.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
No answers on this topic
Usability
Community Brands
I have used this system for about 12 years now and I still learning how to use it. It always surprises me how there is another report to learn to achieve my data reporting goals. It is great to have a system that you have used long enough to feel comfortable with but also a system that allows you to learn new ways to report and enter data into the system
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
The platform is stable even though a version for MacOS is also missed.

In general, the user management and administration process is intuitive and once the roles are defined it is simple and easy.

However, the user experience has become out of date in relation to other web-based platforms currently available on the market.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Community Brands
I have rarely encountered any issues accessing MIP Fund Accounting over the years. On the rare occasions when availability was interrupted, the reasons were always found in-house when using the on-premises version. Since we have migrated to the MIP cloud, we have had no issues with availability. Any maintenance or updates are always communicated to us and are usually done outside of business hours.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
No answers on this topic
Performance
Community Brands
This software is really good as you can run reports for various funds by Revenue Code or Grant code to capture all the data you need for specific revenue streams. Like I said before, this software is amazing for the tracking of grants if you set up your chart of accounts up correctly.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Community Brands
I have not reached out to MIP for technical support; however, their website offers great help resources so I can solve an issue on my own. Another team member reached out to MIP for support and was helped quickly. The transition process took longer than expected due to a lag in communication.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
Support for Thomson Reuters is very in-depth as they have a ton of knowledge articles that help troubleshoot common issues and gives a launching pad for users to learn more about the product and help them use the tools effectively and efficiently. When needed, reaching out to the live support is always prompt and we are able to effectively work past any issues that come up.
Read full review
In-Person Training
Community Brands
There are no specifics on what happens if you make one choice or another to know which is the best selection. This is true for JVs and AP. In training we were not given specifics of what happens when one possibility is selected over another.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Community Brands
Denise O'Malley provided training for the HR module when we added it to our system. Denise also gave us a demo of the EWS module which we were able to see that it would not meet our needs. She was very kind about and understanding regarding the functions we needed with a time clock system.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Community Brands
Don't waste your time with MIP. There are plenty of other softwares out there that will do the job better. Do your homework. Get references from actual users. Make sure that what you choose will truly integrate. Make sure that there is local support. Get training. You will be glad that you passed this one by. Trust me.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Community Brands
The HRA used RealPage (I'm not sure if it is actually the one listed above), and it did not work well. I'm not sure if it wasn't set up well, designed for larger property management companies, or just not good software, but it did not suit our needs at all. We chose a different property management software and MIP for our accounting. We used Quickbooks for Heartland Lakes, but as our business is expanding and we needed a better true fund accounting software, we chose AccuFund to start with, but it was difficult to get set up how we needed. We did not trust the information we were getting out of it, and it wasn't easily customizable to what we needed. We canceled that software and chose MIP.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
Thomson Reuters is all I have experience with.
Read full review
Scalability
Community Brands
The flexibility to create certain features are helpful and are designed to be easier on MIP Accounting Cloud. It has been easier than the MIP Accounting classic version. I may have not fully utilized the software to deploy across multiple departments other than generating revenue reports or expenses. As well as developing budget worksheets for our departments. Which are great as it is, but have not gone farther than that.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Community Brands
  • MIP has allowed us to break down our costs even further to be able to improve our use of funding.
  • I'm looking forward to streamlining our accounting processes even further as I learn more about the possibilities with MIP.
  • As we fundraise for specific projects, we are able to track income and expenses by project to give our donors true numbers on how the money was used.
Read full review
Thomson Reuters
  • Not authorized to view the large scale picture of Thomson Reuters CS Suite on ROI, however, it has been a part of the business model for years with constant updates and is only getting more and more efficient as time goes on.
Read full review
ScreenShots

MIP Fund Accounting Screenshots

Screenshot of MIP Advance™ Dashboards with drilldownScreenshot of MIP™ Transactions WorkflowScreenshot of MIP DashboardsScreenshot of MIP DashboardsScreenshot of MIP Dashboard drilldownScreenshot of MIP Transactions