What users are saying about

Abstract vs TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

Abstract
15 Ratings
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
27 Ratings

Abstract

15 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 5.5 out of 100

Based on 15 reviews and ratings

TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

27 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.1 out of 100

Based on 27 reviews and ratings

Feature Set Ratings

    Project Management

    7.8

    Abstract

    78%

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    Abstract ranks higher in 3/3 features
    Abstract ranks higher in 3/3 features

    Workflow Automation

    7.6
    76%
    2 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Mobile Access

    7.0
    70%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Search

    8.9
    89%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Communication

    8.7

    Abstract

    87%

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    Abstract ranks higher in 4/4 features
    Abstract ranks higher in 4/4 features

    Chat

    10.0
    100%
    2 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Notifications

    9.1
    91%
    4 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Discussions

    8.0
    80%
    4 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Internal knowledgebase

    7.6
    76%
    2 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    File Sharing & Management

    8.1

    Abstract

    81%

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    Abstract ranks higher in 5/5 features
    Abstract ranks higher in 5/5 features

    Versioning

    10.0
    100%
    4 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Document collaboration

    8.5
    85%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Access control

    6.3
    63%
    4 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Advanced security features

    6.7
    67%
    2 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Device sync

    9.1
    91%
    3 Ratings
    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software

    Abstract

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    7.9

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

    79%
    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 4/4 features
    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 4/4 features

    High quality audio

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.5
    85%
    3 Ratings

    High quality video

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    7.5
    75%
    3 Ratings

    Low bandwidth requirements

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    7.5
    75%
    3 Ratings

    Mobile support

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.0
    80%
    3 Ratings

    Screen Sharing

    Abstract

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    8.5

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

    85%
    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 2/2 features
    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 2/2 features

    Desktop sharing

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.5
    85%
    3 Ratings

    Whiteboards

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.5
    85%
    3 Ratings

    Online Meetings / Events

    Abstract

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    8.1

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

    81%
    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 5/5 features
    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 5/5 features

    Calendar integration

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.0
    80%
    3 Ratings

    Meeting initiation

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    7.5
    75%
    3 Ratings

    Integrates with social media

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    9.0
    90%
    3 Ratings

    Record meetings / events

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.0
    80%
    3 Ratings

    Slideshows

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.0
    80%
    3 Ratings

    Online Events Collaboration

    Abstract

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    7.8

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

    78%
    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 3/3 features
    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 3/3 features

    Live chat

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.0
    80%
    3 Ratings

    Audience polling

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    7.5
    75%
    3 Ratings

    Q&A

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.0
    80%
    1 Rating

    Online Events Security

    Abstract

    Feature Set Not Supported
    N/A
    8.7

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

    87%
    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 3/3 features
    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 3/3 features

    User authentication

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.5
    85%
    3 Ratings

    Participant roles & permissions

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    8.5
    85%
    3 Ratings

    Confidential attendee list

    N/A
    0 Ratings
    9.0
    90%
    2 Ratings

    Attribute Ratings

    • TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) is rated higher in 2 areas: Likelihood to Recommend, Support Rating

    Likelihood to Recommend

    2.8

    Abstract

    28%
    4 Ratings
    7.5

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

    75%
    12 Ratings

    Usability

    7.0

    Abstract

    70%
    1 Rating

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

    N/A
    0 Ratings

    Support Rating

    8.5

    Abstract

    85%
    7 Ratings
    9.0

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

    90%
    2 Ratings

    Likelihood to Recommend

    Abstract

    • Large teams with dedicated design operations support
    • UX managers that want a facilitated workflow for their teams
    • Disciplined teams of individual contributors that want to adopt a process in their UI workflow
    • Cross-discipline teams that want a central collaboration space for reviewing and critiquing UI artifacts
    • If your files are named "FOR-REALS_FINAL_FINAL_FINAL_Super-Important-Project (copy).sketch"
    • If you're managing multiple pattern libraries

    Read full review

    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Verified User
    View all 4 answers on this topic

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

    Blizz is great for any kind of video conferencing call, it brings a lot to the table and manages to execute its service very well. I would recommend it to anyone that is looking for an affordable and solid video conferencing experience. In my opinion, it would suit both medium and small teams the most.

    Read full review

    Anna Abalyan | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Anna Abalyan
    View all 12 answers on this topic

    Pros

    Abstract

    • Versioning for desginers
    • Collaboration between team members

    Read full review

    Christopher Fritz | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Christopher Fritz
    View all 4 answers on this topic

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

    • Very effective linking of different devices. Easy to join from anywhere/any device by just entering the meeting ID.
    • Minimal, intuitive interface that takes very little getting used to. I skipped the help section and still figured everything out within a couple of minutes.
    • Pairs with Outlook so you can view all your existing contacts from within Blizz. Really saves time and stops anyone being missed out.
    • Can support up to 300 participants.
    • Reasonable pricing structure. Free for personal use and still good value for the higher-level packages. You can also add local numbers for free.
    • Live text chat for use during a meeting if you have something to say but don’t want to interrupt the presenter.
    • A secured connection so there are no issues sending sensitive documents etc.
    • The audio and video quality has always been excellent (although I’ve come to expect this from any conferencing software nowadays).

    Read full review

    Tom Foster | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Tom Foster
    View all 12 answers on this topic

    Cons

    Abstract

    • Asset exports are not as great as Zeplin and others.
    • Filtering within files.

    Read full review

    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Verified User
    View all 4 answers on this topic

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

    • I tried adding new people to the meeting and if they are not already part of my contact list, I could not search for them easily during the meeting. There were no error messages when searching for non-existing users in my contact list. I expected a message stating that no contacts were found.

    Read full review

    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Verified User
    View all 12 answers on this topic

    Pricing Details

    Abstract

    General

    Free Trial
    —
    Free/Freemium Version
    —
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    —
    Entry-level set up fee?
    No

    Starting Price

    —

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

    General

    Free Trial
    —
    Free/Freemium Version
    —
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    —
    Entry-level set up fee?
    No

    Starting Price

    —

    Usability

    Abstract

    Abstract 7.0
    Based on 1 answer
    Abstract has a difficult learning curve. If a feature-branch workflow is new to you, then it will take some getting used to. They make a lot of updates to the interface and these feature releases get ahead of their documentation. They rely heavily on an excellent customer support team and are present on various Slack channels to help design professionals with issues.

    Read full review

    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Verified User
    View all 1 answers on this topic

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

    No score
    No answers yet
    No answers on this topic

    Support Rating

    Abstract

    Abstract 8.5
    Based on 7 answers
    Abstract by nature is complex and has to respond to whatever changes in Sketch. So there are frequent issues. Support can be slow to respond and are not always helpful, but they are quick to find and patch the bugs. Overall, it's not the best support, but it hasn't been detrimental.

    Read full review

    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Verified User
    View all 7 answers on this topic

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) 9.0
    Based on 2 answers
    The last time I had interaction with Blizz by TeamViewer support was directly on their website in the Help option, I sent them a written message, and in a few minutes, they had already answered me.I think the technical service is efficient.

    Read full review

    Denise Heaton | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Denise Heaton
    View all 2 answers on this topic

    Alternatives Considered

    Abstract

    I purchased and administer Abstract. It was requested by our design department who evaluated it.

    Read full review

    Christopher Fritz | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Christopher Fritz
    View all 4 answers on this topic

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

    Previously, our sister company [didn't] want to invest [in] meeting software, so we were only using free version software, which has limits, like meeting time limit, file sharing limit, and [the] audio and video [were] not clear [as] it depended upon internet connectivity. [However,] when we changed to TeamViewer Meeting, we have seen immense change in the above features.

    Read full review

    Mohammed Ashfaq Hussain | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Mohammed Ashfaq Hussain
    View all 12 answers on this topic

    Return on Investment

    Abstract

    • Single source of truth for the team.
    • Could quickly get expensive with corporate accounts.

    Read full review

    Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer
    Verified User
    View all 4 answers on this topic

    TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)

    • Using the Blizz app for my growing business, I’ve saved lots of money just from not having to spend on gas to meet in person or spend on getting other more expensive apps.
    • Eventually, as my business grows (partially also thanks to Blizz), I’ll have to upgrade the app, but the upgrade doesn’t concern me, as I’ll still be saving more money than I was before having Blizz.
    • Since communication is made easy with this app, it also saves me time - time that can now be spent investing in my business.

    Read full review

    G. Scot Robinson | TrustRadius Reviewer
    G. Scot Robinson
    View all 12 answers on this topic

    Screenshots

    Abstract

    —

    Add comparison