What users are saying about
15 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>Score 5.5 out of 100
Based on 15 reviews and ratings
27 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>Score 8.1 out of 100
Based on 27 reviews and ratings
Feature Set Ratings
Project Management
7.8
Abstract
78%
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
Feature Set Not Supported
N/A
Abstract ranks higher in 3/3 features
Abstract ranks higher in 3/3 features
Workflow Automation
7.6
76%
2 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Mobile Access
7.0
70%
3 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Search
8.9
89%
3 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Communication
8.7
Abstract
87%
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
Feature Set Not Supported
N/A
Abstract ranks higher in 4/4 features
Abstract ranks higher in 4/4 features
Chat
10.0
100%
2 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Notifications
9.1
91%
4 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Discussions
8.0
80%
4 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase
7.6
76%
2 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
8.1
Abstract
81%
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
Feature Set Not Supported
N/A
Abstract ranks higher in 5/5 features
Abstract ranks higher in 5/5 features
Versioning
10.0
100%
4 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Document collaboration
8.5
85%
3 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Access control
6.3
63%
4 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Advanced security features
6.7
67%
2 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Device sync
9.1
91%
3 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings
Performance & Compatibility of Online Events Software
Abstract
Feature Set Not Supported
N/A
7.9
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
79%
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 4/4 features
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 4/4 features
High quality audio
N/A
0 Ratings
8.5
85%
3 Ratings
High quality video
N/A
0 Ratings
7.5
75%
3 Ratings
Low bandwidth requirements
N/A
0 Ratings
7.5
75%
3 Ratings
Mobile support
N/A
0 Ratings
8.0
80%
3 Ratings
Screen Sharing
Abstract
Feature Set Not Supported
N/A
8.5
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
85%
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 2/2 features
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 2/2 features
Desktop sharing
N/A
0 Ratings
8.5
85%
3 Ratings
Whiteboards
N/A
0 Ratings
8.5
85%
3 Ratings
Online Meetings / Events
Abstract
Feature Set Not Supported
N/A
8.1
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
81%
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 5/5 features
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 5/5 features
Calendar integration
N/A
0 Ratings
8.0
80%
3 Ratings
Meeting initiation
N/A
0 Ratings
7.5
75%
3 Ratings
Integrates with social media
N/A
0 Ratings
9.0
90%
3 Ratings
Record meetings / events
N/A
0 Ratings
8.0
80%
3 Ratings
Slideshows
N/A
0 Ratings
8.0
80%
3 Ratings
Online Events Collaboration
Abstract
Feature Set Not Supported
N/A
7.8
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
78%
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 3/3 features
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 3/3 features
Live chat
N/A
0 Ratings
8.0
80%
3 Ratings
Audience polling
N/A
0 Ratings
7.5
75%
3 Ratings
Q&A
N/A
0 Ratings
8.0
80%
1 Rating
Online Events Security
Abstract
Feature Set Not Supported
N/A
8.7
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
87%
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 3/3 features
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) ranks higher in 3/3 features
User authentication
N/A
0 Ratings
8.5
85%
3 Ratings
Participant roles & permissions
N/A
0 Ratings
8.5
85%
3 Ratings
Confidential attendee list
N/A
0 Ratings
9.0
90%
2 Ratings
Attribute Ratings
- TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) is rated higher in 2 areas: Likelihood to Recommend, Support Rating
Likelihood to Recommend
2.8
Abstract
28%
4 Ratings
7.5
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
75%
12 Ratings
Usability
7.0
Abstract
70%
1 Rating
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
N/A
0 Ratings
Support Rating
8.5
Abstract
85%
7 Ratings
9.0
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
90%
2 Ratings
Likelihood to Recommend
Abstract
- Large teams with dedicated design operations support
- UX managers that want a facilitated workflow for their teams
- Disciplined teams of individual contributors that want to adopt a process in their UI workflow
- Cross-discipline teams that want a central collaboration space for reviewing and critiquing UI artifacts
- If your files are named "FOR-REALS_FINAL_FINAL_FINAL_Super-Important-Project (copy).sketch"
- If you're managing multiple pattern libraries

Verified User
Team Lead in Product Management
Hospitality Company, 1001-5000 employeesTeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
Blizz is great for any kind of video conferencing call, it brings a lot to the table and manages to execute its service very well. I would recommend it to anyone that is looking for an affordable and solid video conferencing experience. In my opinion, it would suit both medium and small teams the most.
Account Manager
DigitainInformation Technology and Services, 1001-5000 employees
Pros
Abstract
- Versioning for desginers
- Collaboration between team members
Head of Global IT
VerticMarketing and Advertising, 51-200 employees
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
- Very effective linking of different devices. Easy to join from anywhere/any device by just entering the meeting ID.
- Minimal, intuitive interface that takes very little getting used to. I skipped the help section and still figured everything out within a couple of minutes.
- Pairs with Outlook so you can view all your existing contacts from within Blizz. Really saves time and stops anyone being missed out.
- Can support up to 300 participants.
- Reasonable pricing structure. Free for personal use and still good value for the higher-level packages. You can also add local numbers for free.
- Live text chat for use during a meeting if you have something to say but don’t want to interrupt the presenter.
- A secured connection so there are no issues sending sensitive documents etc.
- The audio and video quality has always been excellent (although I’ve come to expect this from any conferencing software nowadays).
Copywriter/Content Marketer
Self-EmployedWriting and Editing, 1-10 employees
Cons
Abstract
- Asset exports are not as great as Zeplin and others.
- Filtering within files.

Verified User
Contributor in Research & Development
Consumer Electronics Company, 5001-10,000 employeesTeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
- I tried adding new people to the meeting and if they are not already part of my contact list, I could not search for them easily during the meeting. There were no error messages when searching for non-existing users in my contact list. I expected a message stating that no contacts were found.

Verified User
Professional in Information Technology
Information Technology and Services Company, 1-10 employeesPricing Details
Abstract
General
Free Trial
—Free/Freemium Version
—Premium Consulting/Integration Services
—Entry-level set up fee?
No
Starting Price
—TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
General
Free Trial
—Free/Freemium Version
—Premium Consulting/Integration Services
—Entry-level set up fee?
No
Starting Price
—Usability
Abstract
Abstract 7.0
Based on 1 answer
Abstract has a difficult learning curve. If a feature-branch workflow is new to you, then it will take some getting used to. They make a lot of updates to the interface and these feature releases get ahead of their documentation. They rely heavily on an excellent customer support team and are present on various Slack channels to help design professionals with issues.

Verified User
Team Lead in Product Management
Hospitality Company, 1001-5000 employeesTeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Abstract
Abstract 8.5
Based on 7 answers
Abstract by nature is complex and has to respond to whatever changes in Sketch. So there are frequent issues. Support can be slow to respond and are not always helpful, but they are quick to find and patch the bugs. Overall, it's not the best support, but it hasn't been detrimental.

Verified User
Director in Other
Design Company, 5001-10,000 employeesTeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz) 9.0
Based on 2 answers
The last time I had interaction with Blizz by TeamViewer support was directly on their website in the Help option, I sent them a written message, and in a few minutes, they had already answered me.I think the technical service is efficient.
Project Management
Westinghouse Electric CompanyOil & Energy, 5001-10,000 employees
Alternatives Considered
Abstract
I purchased and administer Abstract. It was requested by our design department who evaluated it.
Head of Global IT
VerticMarketing and Advertising, 51-200 employees
TeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
Previously, our sister company [didn't] want to invest [in] meeting software, so we were only using free version software, which has limits, like meeting time limit, file sharing limit, and [the] audio and video [were] not clear [as] it depended upon internet connectivity. [However,] when we changed to TeamViewer Meeting, we have seen immense change in the above features.
IT Support Specialist
Arenco Real EstateReal Estate, 501-1000 employees
Return on Investment
Abstract
- Single source of truth for the team.
- Could quickly get expensive with corporate accounts.

Verified User
Contributor in Research & Development
Consumer Electronics Company, 5001-10,000 employeesTeamViewer Meeting (formerly Blizz)
- Using the Blizz app for my growing business, I’ve saved lots of money just from not having to spend on gas to meet in person or spend on getting other more expensive apps.
- Eventually, as my business grows (partially also thanks to Blizz), I’ll have to upgrade the app, but the upgrade doesn’t concern me, as I’ll still be saving more money than I was before having Blizz.
- Since communication is made easy with this app, it also saves me time - time that can now be spent investing in my business.
President
Robinson Creative SolutionsWriting and Editing, 1-10 employees