What users are saying about
7 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 5.6 out of 100
1 Rating
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 10 out of 100

Likelihood to Recommend

Abstract

  • Large teams with dedicated design operations support
  • UX managers that want a facilitated workflow for their teams
  • Disciplined teams of individual contributors that want to adopt a process in their UI workflow
  • Cross-discipline teams that want a central collaboration space for reviewing and critiquing UI artifacts
  • If your files are named "FOR-REALS_FINAL_FINAL_FINAL_Super-Important-Project (copy).sketch"
  • If you're managing multiple pattern libraries
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

XWiki Collaboration Suite

XWiki is very well suited for a very wide range of web collaboration and web development.
Stéphane Laurière | TrustRadius Reviewer

Feature Rating Comparison

Project Management

Abstract
7.7
XWiki Collaboration Suite
8.0
Workflow Automation
Abstract
7.5
XWiki Collaboration Suite
8.0
Mobile Access
Abstract
7.0
XWiki Collaboration Suite
8.0
Search
Abstract
8.6
XWiki Collaboration Suite
9.0
Task Management
Abstract
XWiki Collaboration Suite
8.0
Scheduling
Abstract
XWiki Collaboration Suite
8.0
Visual planning tools
Abstract
XWiki Collaboration Suite
7.0

Communication

Abstract
8.7
XWiki Collaboration Suite
10.0
Chat
Abstract
10.0
XWiki Collaboration Suite
Notifications
Abstract
9.2
XWiki Collaboration Suite
10.0
Discussions
Abstract
8.0
XWiki Collaboration Suite
10.0
Internal knowledgebase
Abstract
7.5
XWiki Collaboration Suite
10.0

File Sharing & Management

Abstract
8.1
XWiki Collaboration Suite
7.8
Versioning
Abstract
10.0
XWiki Collaboration Suite
10.0
Document collaboration
Abstract
8.5
XWiki Collaboration Suite
10.0
Access control
Abstract
6.9
XWiki Collaboration Suite
10.0
Advanced security features
Abstract
6.2
XWiki Collaboration Suite
Device sync
Abstract
9.1
XWiki Collaboration Suite
Video files
Abstract
XWiki Collaboration Suite
5.0
Audio files
Abstract
XWiki Collaboration Suite
5.0
Integrates with Google Drive
Abstract
XWiki Collaboration Suite
7.0

Pros

Abstract

  • Versioning for desginers
  • Collaboration between team members
Christopher Fritz | TrustRadius Reviewer

XWiki Collaboration Suite

  • XWiki makes it easy to manage semi-structured information, which is at the heart of every knowledge nexus of organizations. It makes it easy to manage in a single system both structured data (such as memberships, projects), and unstructured data.
  • XWiki offers a very rich API for creating enterprise applications quickly that are easy to maintain and evolve collaboratively.
  • XWiki templating and skinning system is extremely flexible and powerful.
Stéphane Laurière | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

Abstract

  • Asset exports are not as great as Zeplin and others.
  • Filtering within files.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

XWiki Collaboration Suite

  • While the basic pieces are available for turning XWiki into an advanced semantic system, some features could be made available more prominently to the user for easing the use of faceted and typed links, paving the way for a new era of collaborative knowledge sharing.
Stéphane Laurière | TrustRadius Reviewer

Usability

Abstract

Abstract 7.0
Based on 1 answer
Abstract has a difficult learning curve. If a feature-branch workflow is new to you, then it will take some getting used to. They make a lot of updates to the interface and these feature releases get ahead of their documentation. They rely heavily on an excellent customer support team and are present on various Slack channels to help design professionals with issues.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

XWiki Collaboration Suite

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Support Rating

Abstract

Abstract 8.3
Based on 5 answers
Abstract by nature is complex and has to respond to whatever changes in Sketch. So there are frequent issues. Support can be slow to respond and are not always helpful, but they are quick to find and patch the bugs. Overall, it's not the best support, but it hasn't been detrimental.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

XWiki Collaboration Suite

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Alternatives Considered

Abstract

I purchased and administer Abstract. It was requested by our design department who evaluated it.
Christopher Fritz | TrustRadius Reviewer

XWiki Collaboration Suite

XWiki key differentiators in my opinion:
  • Fast app development framework with very rich API
  • Open-source strategy, opening the way to collaborative innovation
Stéphane Laurière | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

Abstract

  • Single source of truth for the team.
  • Could quickly get expensive with corporate accounts.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

XWiki Collaboration Suite

  • XWiki has a positive impact on the OW2 communication and collaborations strategies. It saves time when developing applications.
Stéphane Laurière | TrustRadius Reviewer

Screenshots

Pricing Details

Abstract

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

XWiki Collaboration Suite

General

Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Entry-level set up fee?
Optional
$4

Rating Summary

Likelihood to Recommend

Abstract
5.2
XWiki Collaboration Suite
10.0

Usability

Abstract
7.0
XWiki Collaboration Suite

Support Rating

Abstract
8.3
XWiki Collaboration Suite

Add comparison