What users are saying about
18 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 6.3 out of 100
1 Rating
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 10 out of 100

Feature Set Ratings

  • Abstract ranks higher in 1 feature set: File Sharing & Management
  • XWiki Collaboration Suite ranks higher in 2 feature sets: Project Management, Communication

Project Management

7.8

Abstract

78%
8.0

XWiki Collaboration Suite

80%
XWiki Collaboration Suite ranks higher in 6/6 features

Workflow Automation

7.6
76%
2 Ratings
8.0
80%
1 Rating

Mobile Access

7.0
70%
3 Ratings
8.0
80%
1 Rating

Search

8.9
89%
3 Ratings
9.0
90%
1 Rating

Task Management

N/A
0 Ratings
8.0
80%
1 Rating

Scheduling

N/A
0 Ratings
8.0
80%
1 Rating

Visual planning tools

N/A
0 Ratings
7.0
70%
1 Rating

Communication

8.7

Abstract

87%
10.0

XWiki Collaboration Suite

100%
XWiki Collaboration Suite ranks higher in 3/4 features

Chat

10.0
100%
2 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings

Notifications

9.0
90%
4 Ratings
10.0
100%
1 Rating

Discussions

8.0
80%
4 Ratings
10.0
100%
1 Rating

Internal knowledgebase

7.6
76%
2 Ratings
10.0
100%
1 Rating

File Sharing & Management

8.1

Abstract

81%
7.8

XWiki Collaboration Suite

78%
XWiki Collaboration Suite ranks higher in 6/8 features

Versioning

10.0
100%
4 Ratings
10.0
100%
1 Rating

Document collaboration

8.5
85%
3 Ratings
10.0
100%
1 Rating

Access control

6.2
62%
4 Ratings
10.0
100%
1 Rating

Advanced security features

6.8
68%
2 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings

Device sync

9.1
91%
3 Ratings
N/A
0 Ratings

Video files

N/A
0 Ratings
5.0
50%
1 Rating

Audio files

N/A
0 Ratings
5.0
50%
1 Rating

Integrates with Google Drive

N/A
0 Ratings
7.0
70%
1 Rating

Attribute Ratings

  • XWiki Collaboration Suite is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

Likelihood to Recommend

2.2

Abstract

22%
4 Ratings
10.0

XWiki Collaboration Suite

100%
1 Rating

Usability

7.0

Abstract

70%
1 Rating

XWiki Collaboration Suite

N/A
0 Ratings

Support Rating

8.7

Abstract

87%
7 Ratings

XWiki Collaboration Suite

N/A
0 Ratings

Likelihood to Recommend

Abstract

  • Large teams with dedicated design operations support
  • UX managers that want a facilitated workflow for their teams
  • Disciplined teams of individual contributors that want to adopt a process in their UI workflow
  • Cross-discipline teams that want a central collaboration space for reviewing and critiquing UI artifacts
  • If your files are named "FOR-REALS_FINAL_FINAL_FINAL_Super-Important-Project (copy).sketch"
  • If you're managing multiple pattern libraries
Read full review

XWiki SAS

XWiki is very well suited for a very wide range of web collaboration and web development.
Read full review

Pros

Abstract

  • Versioning for desginers
  • Collaboration between team members
Read full review

XWiki SAS

  • XWiki makes it easy to manage semi-structured information, which is at the heart of every knowledge nexus of organizations. It makes it easy to manage in a single system both structured data (such as memberships, projects), and unstructured data.
  • XWiki offers a very rich API for creating enterprise applications quickly that are easy to maintain and evolve collaboratively.
  • XWiki templating and skinning system is extremely flexible and powerful.
Read full review

Cons

Abstract

  • Asset exports are not as great as Zeplin and others.
  • Filtering within files.
Read full review

XWiki SAS

  • While the basic pieces are available for turning XWiki into an advanced semantic system, some features could be made available more prominently to the user for easing the use of faceted and typed links, paving the way for a new era of collaborative knowledge sharing.
Read full review

Pricing Details

Abstract

Starting Price

Editions & Modules

Abstract editions and modules pricing
EditionModules

Footnotes

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    XWiki Collaboration Suite

    Starting Price

    Editions & Modules

    XWiki Collaboration Suite editions and modules pricing
    EditionModules

    Footnotes

      Offerings

      Free Trial
      Free/Freemium Version
      Premium Consulting/Integration Services

      Entry-level set up fee?

      Optional $4

      Additional Details

      Usability

      Abstract

      Abstract has a difficult learning curve. If a feature-branch workflow is new to you, then it will take some getting used to. They make a lot of updates to the interface and these feature releases get ahead of their documentation. They rely heavily on an excellent customer support team and are present on various Slack channels to help design professionals with issues.
      Read full review

      XWiki SAS

      No answers on this topic

      Support Rating

      Abstract

      Abstract by nature is complex and has to respond to whatever changes in Sketch. So there are frequent issues. Support can be slow to respond and are not always helpful, but they are quick to find and patch the bugs. Overall, it's not the best support, but it hasn't been detrimental.
      Read full review

      XWiki SAS

      No answers on this topic

      Alternatives Considered

      Abstract

      I purchased and administer Abstract. It was requested by our design department who evaluated it.
      Read full review

      XWiki SAS

      XWiki key differentiators in my opinion:
      • Fast app development framework with very rich API
      • Open-source strategy, opening the way to collaborative innovation
      Read full review

      Return on Investment

      Abstract

      • Single source of truth for the team.
      • Could quickly get expensive with corporate accounts.
      Read full review

      XWiki SAS

      • XWiki has a positive impact on the OW2 communication and collaborations strategies. It saves time when developing applications.
      Read full review

      Screenshots

      Add comparison