ACCELQ vs. EasyQA

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ACCELQ
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
ACCELQ is an agile quality management platform that helps users achieve continuous delivery for web, mobile, manual testing, and APIs. It can be used to write and manage manual test cases for the functionality that may be too fluid for automation.N/A
EasyQA
Score 6.0 out of 10
N/A
EasyQA is a Test Management Tool that was created by the custom mobile app and web development shop, ThinkMobile, to help users improve software quality and simplify various quality assurance processes. EasyQA is crafted for QAs, Developers, and PMs. The goal of EasyQA is to provide users with multiple possibilities to manage the testing process, run up to 50 projects simultaneously, manage 3 different platforms within one project and have 50 organizations in one account. EasyQA…N/A
Pricing
ACCELQEasyQA
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ACCELQEasyQA
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup fee$10 Contact us
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ACCELQEasyQA
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
ACCELQEasyQA
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
ACCELQ
-
Ratings
EasyQA
6.8
1 Ratings
17% below category average
Centralized test management00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Map tests to user stories00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Test execution reporting00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Defect management00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ACCELQEasyQA
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.4 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.5 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ACCELQEasyQA
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
ACCELQEasyQA
Likelihood to Recommend
ACCELQ
ACCELQ can support multiple technologies such as web, mobile, API, and mainframe. It’s also suited for SAAS solutions such as Salesforce and addresses challenges such as dynamic HTML. It’s easy to set up, and onboarding is easy, and overall lead time is comparatively less. The overall execution results are captured with screenshots, and it’s easy to debug errors. It has integrations with leading cloud-based desktop and mobile farm services such as Saucelabs, browser stack, etc.; ACCELQ is not developer friendly, and hence the overall adoption for a continuous integration scenario is very limited. If you are using a different test management solution, the integration between accelQ and that tool needs ti to be built and hence requires additional development effort, and it’s buggy too.
Read full review
ThinkMobiles
The complexity of the product is too high, so even changes to a single feature impact many other functionalities. Using EasyQA has helped us create multiple test cases where the feature may have its effects and test and track the progress on as many related functionalities as possible.
Read full review
Pros
ACCELQ
  • Scriptless and hence coding is easy.
  • Maintenance of the scripts are easy.
  • Learning curve is small.
Read full review
ThinkMobiles
  • Creation of test cases for new features
  • Management of created bugs
  • Bug tracking and analysis
Read full review
Cons
ACCELQ
  • The tool is not developer friendly and hence adoption across developers is low.
  • The tool does not have an admin console to manage the users centrally.
  • Different types of licensing and it’s all user based and hence pricey.
Read full review
ThinkMobiles
  • In my experience, they provide poor support
  • The application is still a bit buggy
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
ACCELQ
When we implemented ACCELQ, we conducted POCs with many similar solutions. Among the tools we pursued at that time, accelQ stood out against Tricentis Tosca and QMetry automation studio. However, subject 7 did better. However, they were still in the nascent stages of building the tool, and hence we did not pick it.
Read full review
ThinkMobiles
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
ACCELQ
  • Overall adoption of an automation tool went up.
  • Migration of existing selenium scripts to ACCELQ was relatively easy and less effort.
  • Lack of overall admin console and hence managing the agents across different execution is difficult.
  • Integration between accelQ and any test management tool can be difficult and buggy in most cases, even though it can be coded.
Read full review
ThinkMobiles
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

EasyQA Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of