ACCELQ vs. Kualitee

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ACCELQ
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
ACCELQ is an agile quality management platform that helps users achieve continuous delivery for web, mobile, manual testing, and APIs. It can be used to write and manage manual test cases for the functionality that may be too fluid for automation.N/A
Kualitee
Score 5.0 out of 10
N/A
Kualitee is an all-in-one test management tool that supports manual and automated testing. With Kualitee, users can replace inefficient workflows and spreadsheets, and create and import test cases, execute test cases, log defects and perform defect management activities with a dedicated module. The dashboard provides insights into a project's health. Re-Usability of Test Cases: With Kualitee, users can save test cases as a template for later use. During regression testing, use…
$0
3 Users
Pricing
ACCELQKualitee
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Community
$0.00
3 Users
Silver
$45.00
10 Users
Gold
$200.00
10 Users
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ACCELQKualitee
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoYes
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional DetailsFor enterprise get in touch
More Pricing Information
Features
ACCELQKualitee
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
ACCELQ
-
Ratings
Kualitee
6.5
1 Ratings
21% below category average
Centralized test management00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Map tests to user stories00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Test execution reporting00 Ratings7.01 Ratings
Defect management00 Ratings6.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ACCELQKualitee
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.4 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.4 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ACCELQKualitee
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
5.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
ACCELQKualitee
Likelihood to Recommend
ACCELQ
ACCELQ can support multiple technologies such as web, mobile, API, and mainframe. It’s also suited for SAAS solutions such as Salesforce and addresses challenges such as dynamic HTML. It’s easy to set up, and onboarding is easy, and overall lead time is comparatively less. The overall execution results are captured with screenshots, and it’s easy to debug errors. It has integrations with leading cloud-based desktop and mobile farm services such as Saucelabs, browser stack, etc.; ACCELQ is not developer friendly, and hence the overall adoption for a continuous integration scenario is very limited. If you are using a different test management solution, the integration between accelQ and that tool needs ti to be built and hence requires additional development effort, and it’s buggy too.
Read full review
Kualitatem
From a business standpoint, features such as test scenarios, test cases, bug logging, and then graphical representations of every minute detail related to task and projects are very satisfying and productive. We can keep track of literally everything with Kualitee, and our quality is improving. One downside is that we cannot change the visualisations of some graphs. I believe that by giving the user more customisation options, such as filtering out on the basis of days and months, the experience could be greatly improved.
Read full review
Pros
ACCELQ
  • Scriptless and hence coding is easy.
  • Maintenance of the scripts are easy.
  • Learning curve is small.
Read full review
Kualitatem
  • Import and Export
  • Integration with other tools
  • Regression and Blackbox testing
Read full review
Cons
ACCELQ
  • The tool is not developer friendly and hence adoption across developers is low.
  • The tool does not have an admin console to manage the users centrally.
  • Different types of licensing and it’s all user based and hence pricey.
Read full review
Kualitatem
  • Support response time
  • Should have dark mode
  • Response time for API call
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
ACCELQ
When we implemented ACCELQ, we conducted POCs with many similar solutions. Among the tools we pursued at that time, accelQ stood out against Tricentis Tosca and QMetry automation studio. However, subject 7 did better. However, they were still in the nascent stages of building the tool, and hence we did not pick it.
Read full review
Kualitatem
TestRail is very costly and complex compared to Kualitee
Read full review
Return on Investment
ACCELQ
  • Overall adoption of an automation tool went up.
  • Migration of existing selenium scripts to ACCELQ was relatively easy and less effort.
  • Lack of overall admin console and hence managing the agents across different execution is difficult.
  • Integration between accelQ and any test management tool can be difficult and buggy in most cases, even though it can be coded.
Read full review
Kualitatem
  • If the terminology ( Test Scenarios, modules, components ) is not used in your workflow, it may take some time to set up properly because you must figure out how these are defined by your own terminology to get the hierarchy correct
Read full review
ScreenShots

Kualitee Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of