Likelihood to Recommend ACCELQ can support multiple technologies such as web, mobile, API, and mainframe. It’s also suited for SAAS solutions such as Salesforce and addresses challenges such as dynamic HTML. It’s easy to set up, and onboarding is easy, and overall lead time is comparatively less. The overall execution results are captured with screenshots, and it’s easy to debug errors. It has integrations with leading cloud-based desktop and mobile farm services such as Saucelabs, browser stack, etc.; ACCELQ is not developer friendly, and hence the overall adoption for a continuous integration scenario is very limited. If you are using a different test management solution, the integration between accelQ and that tool needs ti to be built and hence requires additional development effort, and it’s buggy too.
Read full review NoCodeBDD is well suited for organizations where fast development is a key factor and not compromise the quality in the process. This helped us reduce the time required for testing and focus on the business growth. This application helps teams to collaborate while developing the features for the product. My to go for modern development process.
Read full review Pros Scriptless and hence coding is easy. Maintenance of the scripts are easy. Learning curve is small. Read full review Organizing features Run features in one click Collaborate using git Easy access reports Read full review Cons The tool is not developer friendly and hence adoption across developers is low. The tool does not have an admin console to manage the users centrally. Different types of licensing and it’s all user based and hence pricey. Read full review Mobile testing Nosql testing Browser stack integration Read full review Alternatives Considered When we implemented ACCELQ, we conducted POCs with many similar solutions. Among the tools we pursued at that time, accelQ stood out against Tricentis Tosca and QMetry automation studio. However, subject 7 did better. However, they were still in the nascent stages of building the tool, and hence we did not pick it.
Read full review NoCodeBDD [has] shown remarkable features like collaboration and most importantly test automation. Unlike other products, it does not require [a] lot of learning and understanding of the product. Most importantly you don't require code development skills as it is no code application. This is the loving part about this product. It helps in all levels of development let it be development, testing, QA, and Product owners review.
Read full review Return on Investment Overall adoption of an automation tool went up. Migration of existing selenium scripts to ACCELQ was relatively easy and less effort. Lack of overall admin console and hence managing the agents across different execution is difficult. Integration between accelQ and any test management tool can be difficult and buggy in most cases, even though it can be coded. Read full review Huge positive impact on ROI Was able to cut down cost in Testing and QA. Was able to deliver features much faster than usual Read full review ScreenShots