ACCELQ vs. QMetry Test Management

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
ACCELQ
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
ACCELQ is an agile quality management platform that helps users achieve continuous delivery for web, mobile, manual testing, and APIs. It can be used to write and manage manual test cases for the functionality that may be too fluid for automation.N/A
QMetry Test Management
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
QMetry in Santa Clara offers their test management tool, the eponymous QMetry Test Management, which offers test case authoring, reusable test cases, test execution, 140+ reports including deep traceability and test case coverage reports with customization options, and integrations with Jira, CI/CD tools like Bamboo/Jenkins, and Automation frameworks.N/A
Pricing
ACCELQQMetry Test Management
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ACCELQQMetry Test Management
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
ACCELQQMetry Test Management
Considered Both Products
ACCELQ
Chose ACCELQ
When we implemented ACCELQ, we conducted POCs with many similar solutions. Among the tools we pursued at that time, accelQ stood out against Tricentis Tosca and QMetry automation studio. However, subject 7 did better. However, they were still in the nascent stages of building …
QMetry Test Management

No answer on this topic

Features
ACCELQQMetry Test Management
Test Management
Comparison of Test Management features of Product A and Product B
ACCELQ
-
Ratings
QMetry Test Management
9.0
1 Ratings
11% above category average
Centralized test management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Manage test hosts and schedules00 Ratings8.01 Ratings
Map tests to user stories00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Test execution reporting00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Defect management00 Ratings9.01 Ratings
Best Alternatives
ACCELQQMetry Test Management
Small Businesses
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
BrowserStack
BrowserStack
Score 8.3 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
ReadyAPI
ReadyAPI
Score 7.5 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.6 out of 10
Enterprises
ignio AIOps
ignio AIOps
Score 8.1 out of 10
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
OpenText ALM/Quality Center
Score 7.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
ACCELQQMetry Test Management
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
ACCELQQMetry Test Management
Likelihood to Recommend
ACCELQ
ACCELQ can support multiple technologies such as web, mobile, API, and mainframe. It’s also suited for SAAS solutions such as Salesforce and addresses challenges such as dynamic HTML. It’s easy to set up, and onboarding is easy, and overall lead time is comparatively less. The overall execution results are captured with screenshots, and it’s easy to debug errors. It has integrations with leading cloud-based desktop and mobile farm services such as Saucelabs, browser stack, etc.; ACCELQ is not developer friendly, and hence the overall adoption for a continuous integration scenario is very limited. If you are using a different test management solution, the integration between accelQ and that tool needs ti to be built and hence requires additional development effort, and it’s buggy too.
Read full review
QMetry
QMetry, like any new-gen test management tool, works well with any type of development methodologies, be it agile, waterfall or hybrid. It is positioned to be a tool for enterprises of any size. QMetry also provides easy migration of existing test artifacts from a legacy test management tool to QMetry without loss of any information. The one thing that I see as an opportunity for improvement is trying to provide out-of-box integration with all major test automation tools. Another area could be to expand the offering to include it as a product suite with accessibility testing, security testing, performance testing, and test automation which is what the trend is.
Read full review
Pros
ACCELQ
  • Scriptless and hence coding is easy.
  • Maintenance of the scripts are easy.
  • Learning curve is small.
Read full review
QMetry
  • Works well with all dev methodologies.
  • Real-time integration with Jira.
  • Out of box reports.
  • Integration with test automation tools.
Read full review
Cons
ACCELQ
  • The tool is not developer friendly and hence adoption across developers is low.
  • The tool does not have an admin console to manage the users centrally.
  • Different types of licensing and it’s all user based and hence pricey.
Read full review
QMetry
  • Provision to report on custom fields.
  • Integration with other agile management tools.
  • API limit consumption.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
ACCELQ
When we implemented ACCELQ, we conducted POCs with many similar solutions. Among the tools we pursued at that time, accelQ stood out against Tricentis Tosca and QMetry automation studio. However, subject 7 did better. However, they were still in the nascent stages of building the tool, and hence we did not pick it.
Read full review
QMetry
QMetry provides an easy path for migration from the legacy test management tool. The migration utility is free compared to other vendors. We have received great customer support from day one of the engagement starting with POC, implementation, and ongoing support. Overall, pricing and licensing model are affordable and attractive.
Read full review
Return on Investment
ACCELQ
  • Overall adoption of an automation tool went up.
  • Migration of existing selenium scripts to ACCELQ was relatively easy and less effort.
  • Lack of overall admin console and hence managing the agents across different execution is difficult.
  • Integration between accelQ and any test management tool can be difficult and buggy in most cases, even though it can be coded.
Read full review
QMetry
  • Helped with overall adoption to the new dev model.
  • Fits well with Devops framework.
  • Overall licensing model is affordable and accommodates many users.
Read full review
ScreenShots