What users are saying about
9 Ratings
294 Ratings
9 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 4.3 out of 100
294 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.3 out of 100

Attribute Ratings

  • Bitbucket is rated higher in 2 areas: Likelihood to Recommend, Likelihood to Renew

Likelihood to Recommend

1.0

AccuRev

10%
4 Ratings
8.4

Bitbucket

84%
65 Ratings

Likelihood to Renew

6.1

AccuRev

61%
3 Ratings
9.0

Bitbucket

90%
3 Ratings

Usability

AccuRev

N/A
0 Ratings
8.7

Bitbucket

87%
2 Ratings

Availability

7.0

AccuRev

70%
2 Ratings

Bitbucket

N/A
0 Ratings

Support Rating

AccuRev

N/A
0 Ratings
8.3

Bitbucket

83%
28 Ratings

Likelihood to Recommend

AccuRev

Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Bitbucket

As a team we need to push code into the repo on daily basis, Bitbucket has proven that is a reliable and secure server to save and get the code available in no time. The administration part is really easy and there's an extra tool for every developer profile either if you want to use the console or a GUI like Sourcetree.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pros

AccuRev

  • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
  • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
  • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
Nishant Bilaiya | TrustRadius Reviewer

Bitbucket

  • Very easy to integrate with other DevOps tools like Jenkins and with project/workflow management tools like JIRA.
  • Very efficient in managing security and compliance standards for code, especially during pull requests, merge requests, branching, etc.
  • Very robust in performance, especially the cloud and datacenter versions hardly hit any performance issues and supports more than 2000+ developers in my company.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Cons

AccuRev

  • Ability to zoom in/out for stream-view. We currently have many streams/substreams and unable to view the entire workflow. Zooming in/out would benefit.
  • Being a designer, I use Adobe Flash and SWF files. When updating the SWF files, Accurev does not see these files as being changed and you will be unable to promote. In order to push changes, you must totally rename the SWF file.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Bitbucket

  • The code management UI is a bit rough around the edges and difficult to work with.
  • BitBucket does not have the same simplified PR management tools as other competitors.
  • It's not as easy to integrate 3rd party apps as other competitors.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Pricing Details

AccuRev

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
Optional

Starting Price

AccuRev Editions & Modules

Additional Pricing Details

Bitbucket

General

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No

Starting Price

$0 per month

Bitbucket Editions & Modules

Edition
Free (up to 5 users)$01
Standard$32
Premium$62
Data Center$1,9803
  1. per month
  2. per user/per month
  3. per year
Additional Pricing Details

Likelihood to Renew

AccuRev

AccuRev 6.1
Based on 3 answers
We will renew because it is part of our build process.
Jason Vroustouris | TrustRadius Reviewer

Bitbucket

Bitbucket 9.0
Based on 3 answers
All products have room for improvement. The system improves over time with better and better integrations and I look forward to even more features without paying extra! The system has increased transparency across my organization and with this transparency comes increased throughput on projects. I don't think I can go back to any other system and we are definitely married to this product.
Matthew Budram | TrustRadius Reviewer

Usability

AccuRev

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Bitbucket

Bitbucket 8.7
Based on 2 answers
The architecture of Bitbucket makes it more easily scalable than other source code management repositories. Also, administration and maintaining the instance is very easy. It integrates with JIRA and other CI/CD applications which makes it more useful to reduce the efforts. It supports multiple plugins and those bring a lot of extra functionality. It increases the overall efficiency and usefulness of Bitbucket.
Machindra Dharmadhikari | TrustRadius Reviewer

Support Rating

AccuRev

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Bitbucket

Bitbucket 8.3
Based on 28 answers
The customer support provided by Atlassian (Bitbucket's parent company that also makes Jira, Confluence, etc.) is very helpful. They seem to be very concerned about any issues reported with their products and even just questions about functionality. They are constantly improving the products with new features in nearly every release. Plus they have a plethora of online documentation to reference.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Alternatives Considered

AccuRev

In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
Anonymous | TrustRadius Reviewer

Bitbucket

For the features we were looking at, Bitbucket, GitHub and GitLab were all at par and were in a similar price range. We found that GitHub was the most full featured should we need to scale very quickly. GitLab was at par with GitHub for our future needs, but GitHub was a more familiar tool compared to GitLab. Bitbucket won out because of its close integration with Jira and being in the Atlassian family. It was also cheaper than GitHub. As we started with Jira, Bitbucket addition became a natural next step for us. We really liked Bitbucket and stayed with it but we do know we have great options in the form of GitHub and GitLab should we need to scale fast.
Chirag Shukla | TrustRadius Reviewer

Return on Investment

AccuRev

  • Better team coordination.
  • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
  • Better project management by having different work streams.
Nishant Bilaiya | TrustRadius Reviewer

Bitbucket

  • It's allowed for a lot of automation in terms of development workflows. It lets us pursue CI/CD approaches and get releases out faster
  • It has let us get our infrastructure configuration into VCS, which further improves our automation abilities.
  • It has aided in keeping track of changes, and allows us to keep workflows organized so we can track the status of development
Garett Dunn | TrustRadius Reviewer

Add comparison