What users are saying about

AccuRev

9 Ratings

AccuRev

9 Ratings
Score 4.3 out of 101

Octopus Deploy

3 Ratings
Score 8 out of 101

Add comparison

Likelihood to Recommend

AccuRev

Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
No photo available

Octopus Deploy

Octopus Deploy is one of the best options you've got if you are a Microsoft shop. It works seamlessly and is very easy to use and set up. The low cost of the product makes it an attractive option for organizations implementing Release automation processes.

If you are an organization working with open source technologies and not much invested in Microsoft products it makes sense to look at alternatives out there which are great.
Ramendra Sahu profile photo

Pros

  • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
  • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
  • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
Nishant Bilaiya profile photo
  • Deployments are not more error-prone because there is no manual intervention. There had been cases in the past where a thing or two miss would cause a lot of heartburn during Prod release and we had to keep the whole herd together until everything was sorted out. With Octopus Deploy we can test the release with the repeat-ability and chances of running into issues has been minimized a lot.
  • Octopus Deploy works really well with the whole stack of Microsoft Products. It was one of the 1st 3rd party tools for Continuous Deployment focused on MS products when it was initially released. Over time, however, it has matured and supports nearly every technology under the sun for implementing automated deployments.
  • More frequent and parallel deployments. This is where Octopus really shines. This ensures that the QA team is constantly engaged and not waiting for the Dev team as releases are promoted to Test environments faster and ultimately helps to move new features/bug fixes to Prod faster thereby delivering tremendous business value and puts us in a good light in front of our consumers.
  • The tool has a very nice GUI and supports scripting in Powershell, C#, Bash, F#. The Octopus user community has developed close to 80 templates that can be used readily. Octopus works as seamlessly on the Cloud as it works on premises. It has first-class support for both AWS and Azure.
Ramendra Sahu profile photo

Cons

  • The tool allows duplicate file name, if both are present in different directories. This creates confusion if multiple people are working on the same file. It should at least produce a warning.
Nishant Bilaiya profile photo
  • Support for non-Microsoft applications needs to be improved to bring it on par with other comparable automation tools.
  • It doesn't yet provide integration options with other IT management tools like JIRA and HP Support to implement continuous delivery and true DevOps processes.
  • Support for AWS/Azure has been included very recently and it's not still very mature and feature rich and is expected to improve further in upcoming releases.
Ramendra Sahu profile photo

Likelihood to Renew

AccuRev6.1
Based on 3 answers
It covers all the industry needs. It has all the features required to be complete our tasks. Our whole group is very comfortable with this tool.
Nishant Bilaiya profile photo
Octopus Deploy8.0
Based on 1 answer
Would be a 10 except for the retirement of the free Community Edition.
Eric Huggins profile photo

Usability

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic
Octopus Deploy7.0
Based on 1 answer
Octopus Deploy has greatly helped us to improve our reliability and frequency of our deployments and given us the confidence to deploy much more often, with a direct benefit to customers. Cross-platform support and release to Cloud require more focus on the product side.
Ramendra Sahu profile photo

Alternatives Considered

Nishant Bilaiya profile photo
We looked at IBM UrbanCode Deploy and Release and Microsoft VSTS while looking for Application Release Automation tools. While VSTS doesn't work with cross-platform technologies IBM UrbanCode Deploy commands a premium price for the features it offers. Also, it needs UrbanCode Deploy and Releases to work well and results in implementation complexity. Octopus Deploy is best suited for MS products and the cost also worked in the selection factor.
Ramendra Sahu profile photo

Return on Investment

  • Better team coordination.
  • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
  • Better project management by having different work streams.
Nishant Bilaiya profile photo
  • Using Octopus Deploy as the tool for implementing Release automation has really paid off and delivered great business value. It has helped us release 4 times faster than earlier with better quality and made us agiler.
  • Integration with IT management applications is lacking currently which would have driven the benefits of Release automation a notch up.
  • Developers love deployment tools like Octopus which take away the anxiety of Prod release and helps them to focus on their core strengths to deliver better software faster.
Ramendra Sahu profile photo

Pricing Details

AccuRev

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
Optional
Additional Pricing Details

Octopus Deploy

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details