AccuRev vs. Salt Open Source Automation Engine

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
AccuRev
Score 4.3 out of 10
N/A
AccuRev, a software configuration management offering, is now owned and supported by Micro Focus since the December 2013 acquisition.N/A
Salt Open Source
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Salt is an open source automation, infrastructure management, data-driven orchestration, remote execution, and configuration management solution.N/A
Pricing
AccuRevSalt Open Source Automation Engine
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AccuRevSalt Open Source
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AccuRevSalt Open Source Automation Engine
Top Pros
Top Cons
Best Alternatives
AccuRevSalt Open Source Automation Engine
Small Businesses
VMware Aria Automation
VMware Aria Automation
Score 8.3 out of 10
HashiCorp Vagrant
HashiCorp Vagrant
Score 9.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
VMware Aria Automation
VMware Aria Automation
Score 8.3 out of 10
Ansible
Ansible
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce Helix Core
Perforce Helix Core
Score 7.2 out of 10
SUSE Manager
SUSE Manager
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AccuRevSalt Open Source Automation Engine
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(4 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.1
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
7.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
AccuRevSalt Open Source Automation Engine
Likelihood to Recommend
Micro Focus
Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
Read full review
Open Source
Salt Open Source Automation Engine is great for configuring servers in a centralised manner. It is not well suited for creating infrastructure, where tools like Terraform should be used instead.
Read full review
Pros
Micro Focus
  • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
  • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
  • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Reproducible set up of servers
  • Wide array of formulas ("packages")
Read full review
Cons
Micro Focus
  • Ability to zoom in/out for stream-view. We currently have many streams/substreams and unable to view the entire workflow. Zooming in/out would benefit.
  • Being a designer, I use Adobe Flash and SWF files. When updating the SWF files, Accurev does not see these files as being changed and you will be unable to promote. In order to push changes, you must totally rename the SWF file.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Execution time is sometime longer compared to alternatives
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Micro Focus
We will renew because it is part of our build process.
Read full review
Open Source
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Micro Focus
In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
Read full review
Open Source
Puppet was working fine for our needs. We decided to make the switch after our operating system vendor decided to stop official support for SaltStack
Read full review
Return on Investment
Micro Focus
  • Better team coordination.
  • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
  • Better project management by having different work streams.
Read full review
Open Source
  • Much faster turnaround in provisoning test environments
  • Quicker rollout of services
Read full review
ScreenShots