What users are saying about

AccuRev

9 Ratings

Spinnaker

2 Ratings

AccuRev

9 Ratings
Score 4.3 out of 101

Spinnaker

2 Ratings
Score 9.5 out of 101

Add comparison

Likelihood to Recommend

AccuRev

This is one of the best version control tools I have used.
Nishant Bilaiya profile photo

Spinnaker

Spinnaker suits well for applications which are stateless and can adapt to an immutable architecture of deployment. But for applications which are stateful and cannot afford to spin up new servers for every deployment doesn't go well with Spinnaker. It can handle only deployments which are VM based and cannot support deployments to serverless architecture like AWS Lambda etc.
No photo available

Pros

  • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
  • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
  • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
Nishant Bilaiya profile photo
  • The immutable way of deployment is one of its greatest advantages.
  • We have a strict policy to restock our instances with new images very frequently and this can be done very seamlessly via Spinnaker
  • Rollback/ resize of clusters is one of the coolest features of Spinnaker.
No photo available

Cons

  • The tool allows duplicate file name, if both are present in different directories. This creates confusion if multiple people are working on the same file. It should at least produce a warning.
Nishant Bilaiya profile photo
  • Spinnaker on its own has 10 underlying micro services. Managing Spinnaker needs a focussed platform approach
  • No support to deploy the artifacts without re-creating the servers. Only pure immutable deployment are allowed.
  • No authorization at pipelines level
No photo available

Likelihood to Renew

AccuRev6.1
Based on 3 answers
I give it this rating because I found an alternate application that is much more cost effective and quicker
No photo available
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Alternatives Considered

Git is one obvious alternative. However, Git is leveraging the command line and has minimal interface. Developer must be acclimated with command line in order to use Git.
No photo available
• Pipeline Expressiveness• Self-Service/Override• Visibility of Client Teams• Operability of Client Teams -• High-Quality Integrations (AWS, IHP, Google)• Extensibility – (Ability to add code)• The maturity of Deployment Process• Speed/Ease of Onboarding
No photo available

Return on Investment

  • Stable and safe promotions which leads to increased employee efficiency
No photo available
  • As we are using it on a large scale, hosting and maintaining it is affordable.
  • For few of the BU where there are fewer applications in Cloud. Hosting it and maintaining is an overhead and not very cost effective.
No photo available

Pricing Details

AccuRev

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
Optional
Additional Pricing Details

Spinnaker

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details