Achievers vs. SilkRoad Performance

Achievers is well suited as a rewards and recognition platform - which is what it was designed for. It's less appropriate for a company intranet to share files and documents with one another. Allowing users to do both on one platform would be a great solution for bridging the gap between corporate communication and rewards.

Incentivized

No, we just had a bad experience unfortunately.

Incentivized

• It promotes employee-to-employee recognition.
• It provides a way for Management to periodically reward employees for their efforts.
• It provides an incentive for great work as some of the Achievers rewards are incredible!

Incentivized

• Unfortunately our experience was very poor, so I don't have anything for what they do "particularly" well.

Incentivized

• Relevance of rewards catalog
• Exchange rate of catalog items
• Would be nice to see deeper integration with company intranets

Incentivized

• Transparency about the capabilities of their system. We would have never chosen WingSpan had we had a clear picture of the limitations of their system.
• Ease of use - as an administrator we found it to be difficult to work with. Of course, improvements may have been made in this area since we used it last.
• The user interface could use some updating.

Incentivized

We did not evaluate any other system

Incentivized

We used Cvent following our WingSpan experience. It worked out much better and had more capability than WingSpan.

Incentivized

• Positive: it has increased our company's ability to express gratitude for exceptional work
• Positive: it has increased our company's overall morale
• Negative: rewarding points for gratitude can be expensive depending on the size of the company

Incentivized

• I feel it set us back a bit, and also caused us to lose credibility with our management team after it turned out to be a "failed experiment."
• We have gone back to a manual system of doing goal setting that works better for us.

Incentivized