What users are saying about

Acquia

39 Ratings

Hippo CMS

6 Ratings

Acquia

39 Ratings
Score 7.7 out of 101

Hippo CMS

6 Ratings
Score 7.5 out of 101

Add comparison

Likelihood to Recommend

Acquia

Acquia is well-suited for any Drupal web platform. I think it best plays in the enterprise space, either for B2B or nonprofit/higher ed/government. Acquia is a great solution for smaller web platforms, as well, but the price is typically prohibitive in these scenarios.
Zach Ettelman profile photo

Hippo CMS

The system is ideal if you want to reuse content easily. The "document type" logic, which is not page oriented, but content oriented is a clever and efficient way to build up "content bricks". This guarantees an ideal way to use the same content in different templates or even channels. It can also help to feed some mobile-apps as it is planned in our future online strategy
Laurent Vonach profile photo

Feature Rating Comparison

Security

Acquia
8.9
Hippo CMS
Role-based user permissions
Acquia
8.9
Hippo CMS

Platform & Infrastructure

Acquia
8.5
Hippo CMS
API
Acquia
9.0
Hippo CMS
Internationalization / multi-language
Acquia
8.1
Hippo CMS

Web Content Creation

Acquia
7.4
Hippo CMS
WYSIWYG editor
Acquia
8.0
Hippo CMS
Code quality / cleanliness
Acquia
8.8
Hippo CMS
Admin section
Acquia
7.8
Hippo CMS
Page templates
Acquia
8.0
Hippo CMS
Library of website themes
Acquia
6.0
Hippo CMS
Mobile optimization / responsive design
Acquia
7.0
Hippo CMS
Publishing workflow
Acquia
7.8
Hippo CMS
Form generator
Acquia
6.1
Hippo CMS

Web Content Management

Acquia
8.5
Hippo CMS
Content taxonomy
Acquia
8.0
Hippo CMS
SEO support
Acquia
9.0
Hippo CMS
Bulk management
Acquia
7.6
Hippo CMS
Availability / breadth of extensions
Acquia
9.1
Hippo CMS
Community / comment management
Acquia
8.5
Hippo CMS

Pros

  • Deployment management is user friendly and developer extensible.
  • Rudimentary monitoring and logging is user friendly and accessible.
  • The Acquia team is on top of emerging threats, and where possible, silently mitigates the worst of them.
Jason Smith profile photo
  • High scalability and reuse of standard information architecture, templates and features in all countries: Every country will have his own channel, usually multi-language oriented. Product information will be very happy and reuse of content mandatory. The system therefore has to be very robust and scalable.
  • Good usability for back-end users: As more than hundred users will use the system on a daily basis, training had to be as minimal as possible. The backend has to be self-explanatory by itself. Hippo goes this way. If you can use a tree structure and a basic RTEditor, you are ready to use Hippo.
  • State of the art targeting tool: In order to address segmentation of users and to go beyond a simple layout relaunch, our Marketing Department needed a tool which can make use of Personas and build up complex dynamic criterias. Real time analysis of the users behaviors will provide insights and allow the company to build up effective CRM strategies.
Laurent Vonach profile photo

Cons

  • New upgraded interface not as easy to use as the previous one.
Lincoln Souza profile photo
  • Hippo lacks some functionality in the backend to help writers, admins to collaborate. Some internal ticketing system for example would be ideal.
Laurent Vonach profile photo

Likelihood to Renew

Acquia10.0
Based on 8 answers
I'm very satisfied with the performance, reliability, easy-to-use interface for deployment of Acquia network. My team is more productive after having migrated to Acquia network.
Lincoln Souza profile photo
Hippo CMS10.0
Based on 1 answer
So far, Hippo is our ideal tool given its use of open standards which helps us to have a clear overview of what's coming next in the future Hippo releases. We are very confident in the future-readiness of the product
Laurent Vonach profile photo

Alternatives Considered

Acquia offers a more robust product suite than Pantheon. Acquia also offers professional services for another level beyond what Pantheon offers. Acquia pricing is typically more expensive than Pantheon, but the extra cost tends to be worth it, given all the support you receive from Acquia's team.
Zach Ettelman profile photo
Magnolia, Typo3, Drupal, Hybris, Intershop, RBS Change, Sitefinity, Liferay, Crownpeak, Ektron, EzPublish, Coremedia, Pironet, ModX,...We built up a requirement sheet and banished from the selection all CMS wich would not fullfill more than 2 "mandatory" features. Although Hippo did not perfom well in the collaborative features, its core features were going exactly toward our needs. Major focus was mutli-level architecture, scalability, native multi-languages capabilities and excellent roadmap for future releases. We needed a very active development schedule, especially in the field of targeting and real time analysis of users behaviors
Laurent Vonach profile photo

Return on Investment

  • Team time spent on deployment process is greatly reduced.
  • Reliable and scalable environment.
Lincoln Souza profile photo
  • As we can use one single instance of Hippo CMS to feed 50 different countries websites and more to come (extranets, special user restricted areas, B2B sites, etc), we can easily deploy it and maintenance costs are marginal now compared to the previous situation (different CMS in every country with local hosting, maintenance, etc).
  • As Hippo is future ready, countries are already setting up more complex and efficient digital campaigns. This was impossible before as our systems could not address these needs.
Laurent Vonach profile photo

Screenshots

Acquia
Hippo CMS

Pricing Details

Acquia

General
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details

Hippo CMS

General
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
Optional
Additional Pricing Details