ActiveBatch Workload Automation vs. iGrafx

Any large business or organisation that wants to manage their workload effectively and with the least amount of room for error might choose the ActiveBatch Automation tool. Being a consultant I feel that It aids in task automation and has the flexibility to change in response to varying company requirements. It helps to save huge time by doing all the repetitive tasks on daily basis. During the patching activity the schedulers can be stopped. It also help by alerting us if any system/job is down so that SLA can be saved. Overall ActiveBatch Automation stands as a dependable cornerstone for ensuring the seamless operation of our tasks.

Incentivized

Mapping and process control are most important things for us .I can say ,It is very very user-friendly. If i were iGrafx , i would fix support service and do anything to help their customers better.Every departments that need business process should use iGrafx

Incentivized

• Businesses can use ActiveBatch to plan tasks based on parameters like frequency, dependencies, and the time of day. By automating typical actions like backups and data transfers, businesses can make sure that crucial operations go off without a hitch.
• Multiple systems and apps can be used in complicated workflows that ActiveBatch can automate. For instance, it can automate a workflow for processing orders from beginning to end, from the customer order through inventory control and delivery through the processing of invoices and payments.
• Files can be sent between many platforms and systems safely with ActiveBatch. Transfers to cloud-based storage systems like Amazon S3 and Microsoft Azure are also included in this. SFTP and FTP transfers are also included.

• user friendly
• easy implementation
• RPA and AI features
• measuring performance and risks

Incentivized

• On RARE occasions, have seen scheduling properties changed that don't take effect.
• Simpler to understand/more robust reporting options would be nice to have.
• Maybe I'm missing something, but why doesn't the Instances view show completion time? Just execution time and duration.

Incentivized

• Different cloud support
• local support training and documentation
• more advertising

Incentivized

We are pleased to use iGrafx and we can handle all process about our departments.Easy to use and integration.I recommend it to everyone that needs BPM software.

Incentivized

We can easily add new plans/jobs in our batch schedules. Also, coordination with reporting and QA jobs is simple to do. Building schedules, restarting jobs, triggering dependencies is easy to understand. The system is very stable and allows us to easily see overall processing times.

Incentivized

It is easy to use .I can say it is piece of cake.

Incentivized

My colleague contacted them directly, I only know hearsay on this but it was not good.

Incentivized

Late response and less experience are making the problem permanent. You should improve your support team and your process

Incentivized

It was very easy. Too many process maps may confuse your mind. You have to choose what you need

Incentivized

The workload automation solution is based on the specific needs of an organization, as well as the features, capabilities, and costs of various solutions. A thorough evaluation process and consideration of these factors can help ensure the selection of a solution that aligns with overall business objectives and meets the specific needs of the organization.

Incentivized

1-Its price is more attractive than the others.2-Easy to use .The iGrafx is not complicated like the others3-The option to drag and drop objects is very good 4-I think it is the best tool to monitor daily performance used for making critical decision making

Incentivized

• I have not run numbers to determine hard impact, but a quick estimate is that at least one job is running for a average of about 6 hours per day - that 6 hours, if done by hand, would equate to about 30 - 40 hours per day (and in some cases, could not be duplicated manually, as the job repeats faster than a person could accomplish one cycle.)

• Bad support from my experience
• Broad usability
• Easy to use
• Bad reporting in my opinion

Incentivized