AdCreative.ai vs. Flow

If you run many ad campaigns in parallel (or high budget spend campaigns), you'll need to keep feeding the ad platform with lots of fresh ads to combat ad fatigue. This is where adcreative.ai is best suited - it produces lots of targeted ads fast and cheaply. If you run ad campaigns in a niche that requires very specific messaging and images, you may still be better off designing your ads one by one with human creative input

Incentivized

If you are used to using apps such as Slack, Box or Harvest, you will have an easy time getting use to Flow's UI. Drag and drop features, messaging between users, @tagging for notifications that alert you not only on your desktop but your as well email are particularly useful. If you need projects done fast and easily between multiple teams this is a great application for your business. A particular scenario where Flow is NOT suitable would be if you are used to working soley from your phone. Flows mobile app is slow, not user friendly at all and hard to navigate. Also, you cannot use a mobile site because it directs you to using the app. This IMO is a great desktop project manager, but NOT mobile.

Incentivized

• Image + text placement
• Image discovery
• Creative at scale

Incentivized

• Design: very easy to discern what is important at a glance. The UX just works; it's very well thought out.
• Ease of use: onboarding was a breeze. Was up and running in less than an hour.
• Support: in-app support is great, nice website too to find exactly the solutions we needed.

Incentivized

• more freedom change the initial ad format inputs (sometimes you dont want all the fields)
• possibility to fully edit individual ad creatives manually after batch creation

Incentivized

• Better integration with Google Calendar -- it could be a bit clunky
• The mobile app didn't have as much functionality as one would like - you had to download two apps to access the features used on a desktop version

Incentivized

It saves our organization a lot of time and money.

Incentivized

It's missing a lot of sizes and a lot of the "AI".

Incentivized

Flow, unlike Trello, offers its users a more organized interface and much more complete tools to carry out project management, which is why I consider that for the management of business projects of medium or large companies this tool covers the needs of each. In addition, its ease of use makes it much easier to adapt to this tool because it does not require a very learning curve

Incentivized

• Negative because we've had to spend more time editing the files than we thought. It was better to stick with Canva in most cases.

Incentivized

• Our biggest issue prior to flow was scrambling at the last minute to meet a project deadline. Flow has helped us manage tasks towards a deadline to execute more successful events and projects.
• Since Flow is being used across our entire organization, the speed at which we can collaborate cross-departmentally has increased. This is especially true of our communication and collaboration with our Marketing team.
• Flow has allowed our leadership team to be able to see the progress of a project at any time just by looking at that projects dashboard. This has both given them confidence as well as let them know when they need to intervene.

Incentivized