Likelihood to Recommend
If you run many ad campaigns in parallel (or high budget spend campaigns), you'll need to keep feeding the ad platform with lots of fresh ads to combat ad fatigue. This is where adcreative.ai is best suited - it produces lots of targeted ads fast and cheaply. If you run ad campaigns in a niche that requires very specific messaging and images, you may still be better off designing your ads one by one with human creative input
Read full review
Intellimize has done a great job of targeting our highest trafficked pages. For a demand generation organization it helps provide a lot value for places like the homepage or various high value funnels. Where Intellimize falls short is where we have a specific technology stack that often causes issues for us being able to run tests at scale because some experiments break or fail to run. Please do yourself a favor and evaluate this tool with your development team before purchasing. Single Page Applications do have re-rendering issues given some experiments which lead to run-time issues that need to be heavily QA'd before launch. For teams that are ecommerce or have a typical technology stack (e.g. wordpress and static pages), then Intellimize will probably work without any issues.
Read full review Pros Image + text placement Image discovery Creative at scale Read full review CSM and Engineering resources are available with Intellimize and allows us to spend more time thinking about new ideas to implement. AI/Machine Learning allows winning personalizations to continually run or switch between variants for users that may convert better based on firmographic data The CSM is a wonderful collaborator and acts as a liaison between Intellimize's engineering team. With their help, I am able to better refine my own testing roadmap. Read full review Cons more freedom change the initial ad format inputs (sometimes you dont want all the fields) possibility to fully edit individual ad creatives manually after batch creation Read full review No WYSIWIG Editor Limited to only 5 tests a week QA of larger tests that require heavier engineering effort can often run longer than a week and can block the already limited number of tests you can run Read full review Likelihood to Renew
It saves our organization a lot of time and money.
Read full review Alternatives Considered
It's missing a lot of sizes and a lot of the "AI".
Read full review
Intellimize is a league above products like
. Simply having the support from an external engineering team gives your web team the freedom and bandwidth to do more. The level of support for
is entirely limited, especially if you're using the free version of that product, and I am skeptical of paying Google for the paid version of it since the largest value of the paid version of Optimize, is to simply run more tests.
has amazing heatmap and reporting, but severely lacks any Machine Learning or firmographic data. While their support is exceptional, it's not the same as having a dedicated CSM to help plan a roadmap. It's also helpful to note that
, and Intellimize have issues with single page applications. Static websites are likely to run entirely fine without issue.
Read full review Return on Investment Negative because we've had to spend more time editing the files than we thought. It was better to stick with Canva in most cases. Read full review Increased revenue Helped us build out many tests that had the impact of many years of learnings Contributed to more MQLs influenced Read full review ScreenShots