What users are saying about
5 Ratings
Top Rated
30 Ratings
5 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 6.9 out of 101
Top Rated
30 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.6 out of 101

Add comparison

Likelihood to Recommend

adjust

It allows S2S integration. It's the appropriate choice out of all mobile app tracking software as it is very flexible, shows very accurate data, is easy to learn how to use the dashboards, and offers the option to create tailored audiences. It's not so well structured when it comes to reporting, as its dashboard doesn't allow downloading data in bulk by adding different filters.
No photo available

AT Internet

AT Internet is great if you have a wide breadth of users at different skill levels. If people using the tool are only going to be doing very basic analysis or only very detailed analysis, the scope of AT Internet may not be what you need. In our implementation of AT Internet, we have really advanced users as well as very basic users, so all of the applications available get used. AT Internet is also great when you need to perform multi-dimensional reporting. In Google Analytics it's not really possible to create a report in the interface that has more than two dimensions, which is very limiting. AT Internet allows you to add as many dimensions as you want to each analysis, as well as an unlimited number of metrics. Some metrics and dimensions don't play nicely together, however, so you really have to take the time to learn which are crossable, which involves a combination of questioning the support center and trial and error.
No photo available

Pros

  • Tracking installs on mobile app campaigns on Android or iOS, as well as UAC campaigns.
  • Tracking in-app actions on our mobile campaigns.
  • Showing more accurate numbers, since it counts pure installs from new users only without counting re-installs,
  • Counts installs only after first opening of the app, while Google and Apple count also downloads even if the app doesn't get installed or opened after.
No photo available
  • Real-time data: only a four minute delay between an action on a website and processed data you can work with.
  • Support: very responsive support center and intelligent, creative consultants. I've never had a problem they couldn't solve.
  • An application for everyone: there are applications for every type of user, from someone who just needs to view PDF dashboards, to basic data manipulation, to advanced analysts. You can get incredibly in depth with the type of data you're looking at or you can stay on the surface to get quick KPIs.
  • API capabilites: ability to run real-time API calls through one of the apps, connect API calls to Excel, and the ability to import data from external APIs to display in dashboards.
No photo available

Cons

  • The reporting dashboard is not very easy to navigate, it doesn't offer enough options.
  • You can't download granular level data for all channels at once. Adding this as an option would save a lot of time when analyzing the performance and doing reporting.
No photo available
  • Long response time for reports based on a huge datasets in some cases. If your volume of data is high and you're requesting a data within a complex segment then response time could be significant. But the processing time for regular reports could be improved by AT Internet team if you request it.
  • Delays in a problem solving when the issue requires several technical teams cooperation.
Dmitry Kharitonov profile photo

Likelihood to Renew

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic
AT Internet7.6
Based on 9 answers
The AT Internet teams always works on improving their products. I had the opportunity to see a demonstration of some future products: they will be more user friendly, easier to use, and faster at providing data. Moreover, meeting them in the different events they organize is always a pleasant and enriching experience.
Denis Dupouy profile photo

Support

No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic
AT Internet8.9
Based on 3 answers
They are very reactive and their solution is powerful.
Edouard Ader profile photo

Alternatives Considered

Kochava is the most popular one and has a better dashboard, offering many options for visualizing data. Adjust has a poor dashboard in comparison to Kochava, but offers easier integration with SDK and is cheaper. I don't think adjust shares device IDs, though. Its attribution is very accurate and offers very good solutions for fraud prevention
No photo available
AT Internet is easier to use for marketing, and while AT Internet is not free compared with GA the price is reasonable. GA has too much data which is not necessary for a marketing approach.
No photo available

Return on Investment

  • It had positive impact because it allows tracking data without sharing it with Google
  • It's easy to integrate with all channels and many platforms, such as AdWords, Facebook, Twitter, etc.
  • By creating audiences, we've targeted most valuable users to the business
No photo available
  • We get better insights about our users through AT Internet.
  • More accurate and faster content production is possible with AT Internet.
Martin Krieg profile photo

Pricing Details

adjust

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details

AT Internet

General
Free Trial
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Entry-level set up fee?
Optional
1.  per server calls consumption
Additional Pricing Details
Our different options are designed to scale and adapt to your needs : BUSINESS : Starting at 355€/MONTH No obligation Try for 1 month, for free! PREMIUM : Contact us for pricing details Free Trial: Available. Pricing model: Subscription.