AdobeAdvertising Cloud (formerly Adobe Media Optimizer) is an ad management product and is part of the Adobe Marketing Cloud. It delivers a rules-based bidding solution that improves the performance of search engine marketing campaigns and is integrated with Adobe Analytics.
N/A
Adobe Campaign
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Adobe acquired Neolane in July 2013 and later re-named the product Adobe Campaign. Adobe Campaign provides both marketing automation and marketing resource management functionality such as spend & financial management, workflow, and asset management.
I have used Marketo, Eloqua, HubSpot and ConstantContact. Each has their pro and cons. We need to see the ecosystem and business need to make a recommendation.
Features
Adobe Advertising Cloud
Adobe Campaign
Ad Network Integration
Comparison of Ad Network Integration features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Advertising Cloud
6.6
8 Ratings
11% below category average
Adobe Campaign
-
Ratings
Data Transfer
6.88 Ratings
00 Ratings
DSP integration
6.48 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ad Campaigns
Comparison of Ad Campaigns features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Advertising Cloud
5.8
9 Ratings
29% below category average
Adobe Campaign
-
Ratings
Ad campaign creation
7.19 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ad deployment
7.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Display advertising
4.79 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ad display and retargeting segmentation
5.29 Ratings
00 Ratings
Sequence targeting
5.28 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ad Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Ad Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Advertising Cloud
6.8
9 Ratings
13% below category average
Adobe Campaign
-
Ratings
Ad dashboards
6.29 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ad performance reports
5.99 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ad conversion tracking
7.47 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ad attribution reporting
6.78 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cross-channel ad management
7.78 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ad forecasting and optimization
7.28 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email & Online Marketing
Comparison of Email & Online Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Advertising Cloud
-
Ratings
Adobe Campaign
3.8
93 Ratings
67% below category average
WYSIWYG email editor
00 Ratings
2.587 Ratings
Dynamic content
00 Ratings
3.493 Ratings
Ability to test dynamic content
00 Ratings
3.488 Ratings
Landing pages
00 Ratings
3.185 Ratings
A/B testing
00 Ratings
3.489 Ratings
Mobile optimization
00 Ratings
3.487 Ratings
Email deliverability reporting
00 Ratings
5.291 Ratings
List management
00 Ratings
4.293 Ratings
Triggered drip sequences
00 Ratings
5.382 Ratings
Lead Management
Comparison of Lead Management features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Advertising Cloud
-
Ratings
Adobe Campaign
6.7
6 Ratings
15% below category average
Lead nurturing automation
00 Ratings
7.16 Ratings
Lead scoring and grading
00 Ratings
7.35 Ratings
Data quality management
00 Ratings
6.36 Ratings
Automated sales alerts and tasks
00 Ratings
6.05 Ratings
Campaign Management
Comparison of Campaign Management features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Advertising Cloud
-
Ratings
Adobe Campaign
6.3
87 Ratings
17% below category average
Calendaring
00 Ratings
5.387 Ratings
Event/webinar marketing
00 Ratings
7.46 Ratings
Social Media Marketing
Comparison of Social Media Marketing features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Advertising Cloud
-
Ratings
Adobe Campaign
7.9
4 Ratings
6% above category average
Social sharing and campaigns
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Social profile integration
00 Ratings
7.74 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Advertising Cloud
-
Ratings
Adobe Campaign
5.5
93 Ratings
28% below category average
Dashboards
00 Ratings
5.292 Ratings
Standard reports
00 Ratings
5.292 Ratings
Custom reports
00 Ratings
6.288 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
I think it is good to keep in mind the type of business application you have in mind when selecting Media Optimizer for your company. For us, as an agency, it makes sense for us to utilize the reporting and paid search optimizing portions for our clients as we manage over 300+ clients PPC campaigns. With this tool it is possible to set up campaigns easily and as long as the parameters are set correctly within the portfolio, there is a great opportunity for the tool to do its job and use the simulation/modeling process to run and grow a paid search campaign with ease of human interaction.
Multi-Channel Campaign Management: I have found Adobe Campaign to be excellent for managing campaigns across multiple channels, including email, mobile, social media, and web. Its centralized platform allows me to plan, execute, and track campaigns effectively, making it ideal for organizations with diverse marketing channels. For example, when I was running a campaign to promote a new product launch across email, SMS, and social media channels, Adobe Campaign provided me with the tools to orchestrate and track the campaign seamlessly. I could ensure consistent messaging and a cohesive customer experience across different channels.
It allows me to capture leads through various sources, such as website forms or landing pages.
It offers a centralized repository where I can securely store and manage customer data, encompassing contact information, preferences, transaction records, and additional relevant data.
It provides robust analytics and reporting capabilities.
As with most Adobe products, it can be a little tedious to use and requires a bit of extra training and "googling" around to make sure you are getting things right. It has improved over time within the entire Adobe suite, and I anticipate that this will be true of this as well.
Adobe training and learning platforms can include a lot of technical terminology and jargon that makes it difficult for a novice to understand without feeling like they need a whole new education.
Adobe Campaign does not have a high enough sales intelligence to let us know which landing page format would be the most optimal for the proper development of our mass marketing operations, which in the long run would also help with customer collection.
Does not directly track the number of people who enter our website, beyond sending them automated messages depending on whether they entered a certain section of the site. This problem is important, because it does not allow us to get complete tracking results in that area.
The platform does not do social media marketing extensively enough to let us create dynamic evaluations on the results of interactions that are obtained within social networks, which creates a huge margin of error in our analytical results messages, and so we have stopped applying social marketing.
As of this writing, we have just discontinued our use of Adobe Media Optimizer. Other vendors gave us a better rate, a better contract option, and the product is just better than what we had with Adobe at the time. We may revisit Adobe again at the future, but it seems like they have a lot of work to do to catch up with the leader in the space
Once you go for Neolane you are a bit stuck with it, so we will most likely stay with Neolane. Cost of investment and training are the main factors at work here. We havesimply have invested too much in the product to stop using it after 2 years. That said, my score of 8 does not imply that the product is worthy of getting an 8 but reflects our willingness to renew. Given that upgrading to a new version will cost again a substantial sum, we most likely will keep using the current version we are on which is 6X.
It definitely takes some instruction to get to be able to use the system. One would struggle trying to get it to work without any previous experience with it. If you are famailiar with the interface it is actually quite fast and easy to maneuver around.
Thanks to this tool we are taking more internal control of the creation and deployment of campaigns with less dependency on an ESP. We can pre-program marketing publications, being able to concentrate on the target audience. It helps me manage email campaigns with real-time tracking.
They are super knowledgable and help in almost all situations, however sometimes I feel they put you on hold to find the answers themselves as they literally have said. "Can you hold a few minutes while I research that answer for you?" Most of the time they come back with a solution, other times they manually escalate it to someone else.
Although there is a lot of material available on the internet to answer questions, I still feel a lack of commitment and delay in the responses of the support, but as a whole, it leaves nothing to be desired. I believe that, in the great majority, companies sin in the desired support, but we cannot generalize. But this one, in particular, has a wide range of specialists and well-qualified management, but I believe that it is not so bad.
It was a step up from Marin in terms of UI. Very similar functionality to Marin. Compared to Kenshoo Search and Google Marketing Platform it was probably not as advanced but offered the benefit of integrating with other products in the Adobe stack like Adobe Analytics, Adobe Target, and Adobe Campaign.
As we tried to centralise the marketing automation platform within the enterprise, Adobe Campaign can plug into several instances of Salesforce.com for lead management queues. All other marketing automation platforms can only plug into one instance of Salesforce.com. Adobe Campaign was also able to handle the complexity and challenges of our enterprise data which are a result of years of legacy, mergers and acquisitions and data aggregation.
Not everything was great at all times. It was handled accordingly, pricing was reasonable for what was purchased. It was the best value on the market at the time of purchase.
Talking about profits can be subjective if you don't take into account the periodic variations between net and gross profit margins, but fortunately with Adobe Campaign, it is easy to notice these differences quickly.
Results have always seemed relative to us, as they vary greatly depending on how much is invested.