What users are saying about

Adobe Analytics

Top Rated
398 Ratings

Selligent

16 Ratings

Adobe Analytics

Top Rated
398 Ratings
Score 7.6 out of 101

Selligent

16 Ratings
Score 6 out of 101

Add comparison

Likelihood to Recommend

Adobe Analytics

Adobe Analytics is great for customizing once you get used to the bogged down UI and the unhelpful location of items. we've used it to mimic paywall systems of costly companies. We have base reports set up to manage our paywalls set up in Adobe and they work great. But getting at the minute data is where the issue comes in and the add-ons are needed.
Nathan Collins profile photo

Selligent

Message Studio/Selligent is great for reliably sending high volumes of both manual and automated email. The intuitive user interface promotes fast turnaround times. Aside from some data integration issues, it's the best email service provider I've used for sending large volumes of email.
No photo available

Feature Rating Comparison

Email & Online Marketing

Adobe Analytics
Selligent
5.1
WYSIWYG email editor
Adobe Analytics
Selligent
2.0
Dynamic content
Adobe Analytics
Selligent
9.8
Ability to test dynamic content
Adobe Analytics
Selligent
9.7
Landing pages
Adobe Analytics
Selligent
1.0
A/B testing
Adobe Analytics
Selligent
9.7
Mobile optimization
Adobe Analytics
Selligent
1.0
Email deliverability
Adobe Analytics
Selligent
9.7
List management
Adobe Analytics
Selligent
2.3
Triggered drip sequences
Adobe Analytics
Selligent
1.0

Reporting & Analytics

Adobe Analytics
Selligent
8.2
Dashboards
Adobe Analytics
Selligent
8.2
Standard reports
Adobe Analytics
Selligent
8.2
Custom reports
Adobe Analytics
Selligent
8.2

Pros

  • Next Page Flow reports provide a quick and easy way to see what path customers are taking on the website.
  • The flexibility that creating segments gives the user for analysis purposes is great. A lot of insights can be generated when different segments are compared.
  • The web interface allows for users to quickly pick up on how to use Adobe Analytics, which is a huge advantage over just pointing people to where the raw data can be found since middle management and executives shouldn't be spending time coding and trying to get the data into a visually useful format.
Albert Ihm profile photo
  • Organized and intuitive user interface--very low risk of sending to an incorrect list, launching a test email, or selecting the wrong date (I have seen this on other ESPs)
  • Easy segmenting and content block capabilities
  • Responsive customer service
No photo available

Cons

  • Because it is a web interface, sometimes it's just slow. This could be on the user's side, or on Adobe's side, but it does get annoying when reports or dashboards take a long time to load.
  • A lot of the things I use AA for I learned myself as it was pretty intuitive, but there are many other features that I didn't really understand what they were for or how to utilize them.
Albert Ihm profile photo
  • Better data integration
  • Friendlier user interface
  • Easier guides and instructions
No photo available

Likelihood to Renew

Adobe Analytics9.8
Based on 29 answers
We're embedded within the Adobe ecosystem with - Adobe Analytics, Target and CQ5/AEM. With all these tools implemented correctly and with the right team there's real opportunity to leverage insight and drive revenue. Moreover with the more advanced features enabled there's possibility to replace other reporting systems and reduce internal resources
Richard Hayes profile photo
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Usability

Adobe Analytics6.8
Based on 9 answers
I use Ad Hoc and Omniture. If I had to compare the two (which I have throughout the review), I would have to give AA an overall 9. We do not pay for "Adobe Workspace" and have limited seats available for Ad Hoc. I've experienced frustration with creating reports in Omniture and waiting for the page to reload.
Natasha Watts profile photo
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Reliability and Availability

Adobe Analytics9.0
Based on 5 answers
Adobe SiteCatalyst has a good up-time track record, but there are cases in which the interface reports a "Network Acceleration" issue, which can be frustrating. There are also times when data can be "latent" for customers, but most of these cases are due to spikes in traffic or temporary server issues.
No photo available
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Performance

Adobe Analytics8.5
Based on 4 answers
For the most part, Adobe SiteCatalyst reports work ok, but there are cases in which reports take a long time to return. These cases are usually when too much data has been stored in Conversion Variables (eVars).
No photo available
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Support

Adobe Analytics5.7
Based on 9 answers
I have had many clients that are not thrilled with some aspects of the support. I think the actual day-to-day technical support (ClientCare) is great, but I have heard (and experienced) complaints about the the longer-term services (initial implementation, account management).
No photo available
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

In-Person Training

Adobe Analytics3.6
Based on 3 answers
Myself and others have found the in-person training ok, but not outstanding. Trainers are good at explaining how to use the product features, but sometimes lack "real-world" experience on how to use the product as they are people who have often not previously been web analysts. There is also a shortcoming in company-provided training on advanced uses of the product. The implementation training is very good.
No photo available
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Online Training

Adobe Analytics8.0
Based on 4 answers
The online training for Adobe SiteCatalyst consists of short product videos. These are ok, but only go so far. For a while Adobe charged a fee for this, but recently made these available for free. There are many great blog posts that help users learn how to apply the product as well.
No photo available
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Implementation

Adobe Analytics8.0
Based on 7 answers
The most difficult thing I experienced with SiteCatalysts implementation was the updating of tags on secure areas of the client's website that required another department to program and implement. If a development department is unfamiliar with how SC is implemented on other areas of the website, reporting will be affected as the two implementations won't communicate correctly.
No photo available
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Alternatives Considered

We also use Google Analytics. I still use Google Analytics for evaluating Google Adwords, but use Adobe Analytics for most of my day to day analysis. We chose Adobe analytics because we were using some other Adobe products that this ties into nicely. We also wanted better ways to segment our traffic between our B2B and B2C and this gave us the flexibility we needed
Elizabeth Gross profile photo
Selligent has more flexibility than other ESPs, and complex features, such as segmentation and content blocking, are much more intuitive with Selligent than WhatCounts, Yesmail, MailChimp, Constant Contact, or Teradata.
No photo available

Return on Investment

  • Multiple departments had questions about the e-mail pop-up being shown to visitors on our site. E-Commerce was able to quickly add tracking to the pop-up. After 30 days, we evaluated the pop-up and were able to report a 476% conversion lift. We know our pop-up works due to the ease of analyzing where the pop-up was shown on our site and how it impacted conversion.
Natasha Watts profile photo
  • Increased employee efficiency due to content blocking
  • Lower rate of errors/apology emails due to technical errors
No photo available

Pricing Details

Adobe Analytics

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details

Selligent

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details