Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued) vs. Hotjar

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (DTM) was a tool used by marketers to manage tags, and for collecting and distributing data across digital marketing systems. Adobe DTM is a legacy, and it will not receive feature updates. Adobe invites users to upgrade to Launch on the Adobe Experience Platform.N/A
Hotjar
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Hotjar is a conversion rate optimization tool for digital marketers. Features include heatmapping, visual session recording, conversion funnel analytics, form analytics, feedback polls and surveys, and usability testing. The tool is used by digital analysts, UX designers, web developers and product marketers. Hotjar was acquired by Contentsquare September 2021, and is now a Contentsquare brand.
$39
per month 100 daily sessions
Pricing
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)Hotjar
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Hotjar Observe - Plus
$39
per month 100 daily sessions
Hotjar Ask - Plus
$59
per month 250 monthly responses
Hotjar Ask - Business
$79
per month Starting from 500 monthly responses
Hotjar Observe - Business
$99
per month Starting from 500 daily sessions
Hotjar Scale - Business
$213
per month Starting from 500 daily sessions
Hotjar Ask - Scale
Contact Sales
per month unlimited volume
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)Hotjar
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsDiscount available for annual pricing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)Hotjar
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)Hotjar
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
10.0
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Hotjar
-
Ratings
Role-based user permissions10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Tag Management
Comparison of Tag Management features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
9.4
5 Ratings
16% above category average
Hotjar
-
Ratings
Tag library9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Tag variable mapping10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Ease of writing custom tags10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Rules-driven tag execution9.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Tag performance monitoring10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Page load times10.05 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile app tagging10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Library of JavaScript extensions7.12 Ratings00 Ratings
Data Management & Integrity
Comparison of Data Management & Integrity features of Product A and Product B
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)
7.6
4 Ratings
9% below category average
Hotjar
-
Ratings
Event tracking10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Mobile event tracking10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Data distribution management7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Universal data layer10.04 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated error checking1.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)Hotjar
Small Businesses
Google Tag Manager
Google Tag Manager
Score 8.4 out of 10
Smartlook
Smartlook
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Google Tag Manager
Google Tag Manager
Score 8.4 out of 10
Siteimprove
Siteimprove
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Score 8.7 out of 10
Contentsquare
Contentsquare
Score 8.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)Hotjar
Likelihood to Recommend
10.0
(6 ratings)
8.7
(101 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
5.1
(2 ratings)
Usability
5.0
(2 ratings)
9.7
(6 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.6
(4 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Adobe Dynamic Tag Management (discontinued)Hotjar
Likelihood to Recommend
Discontinued Products
If you're on the Adobe stack at all, you absolutely need DTM. It will make your life infinitely easier. It's so simple to update your Adobe Analytics code and have version control, and when we implemented Adobe Target, it took literally less than 15 minutes for me to do. I also think it's significantly simpler than Google Tag Manager. I went through all manner of difficulty when implementing tags on that and have not had similar problems on DTM. If you're frequently placing pixels, it's a great tool that will speed their deployment. The only situation in which I think a tag manager is not appropriate is if you have a dev with too much time on their hands. Otherwise, get a TMS and get DTM.
Read full review
Contentsquare
Hotjar is good for a first pass at understanding user sentiment or locating potential usability issues. There are features such as "rage clicked" which shows recordings or instances when a user rage clicked or had an issue with your site. Hotjar has also been helpful to launch intercept surveys on mobile, desktop, and app, which not all competitor software allow. Hotjar recordings are fun to watch. "Watching Hotjar like Netflix" is a favorite pastime at work.
Read full review
Pros
Discontinued Products
  • It is a rules based tag management system that allows the application of tracking pixels much easier than hard coding.
  • By placing 2 pieces of code on the top and bottom of each page of a website, we can create rules that track certain events and relay the information back to Adobe Media Optimizer and Google analytics.
  • It has simplified the coding process so one doesn't have to generate tons of gory javascript to deploy on each individual page to get tracking.
Read full review
Contentsquare
  • Heat mapping is great on Hotjar. It is a good place to start when you are looking at the UX & CRO on your website. You can see the % of people clicking on elements on a page, how far they scroll, and mouse movements.
  • Hotjar is great for session recordings. These record the mouse movements, clicks, pages and scrolls of a user in video format. You can watch these to investigate what works well on a site and identify potential roadblocks and bugs.
  • Hotjar is great as it ensures that users details are anonymous; for instance, if you are watching a session recording, you cannot see what a user types in a form field, as Hotjar blanks this out.
  • Hotjar has a poll function, so you can have polls on your website.
Read full review
Cons
Discontinued Products
  • It is only available with Adobe Marketing Cloud so you can't buy it as an independent product.
  • It is easier to use than Google Tag Manager, but not nearly as popular.
  • Whereas Google Tag Manager is free, Dynamic Tag Management must be purchased as part of Adobe Marketing Cloud.
Read full review
Contentsquare
  • Hotjar is primarily used for web-based experiences. Not that easy to use on mobile apps.
  • I'd love to see Hotjar integrated with Google Analytics for an even deeper view.
  • Hotjar is primarily used by smaller organizations...pricing can get steep quickly for larger organizations.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Discontinued Products
As it interfaces so well with AMO, we shall be utilizing the DTM for any future client additions.
Read full review
Contentsquare
Even though the heat maps and user recordings were useful, our website was significantly slowed down after we installed Hotjar, so much so, that it took over a minute for our blog to load. The data that we gathered was not worth the length that it took our website to load.
Read full review
Usability
Discontinued Products
It is easy to use at a basic level, however without JavaScript resource you will struggle.
Read full review
Contentsquare
So easy and simple to use! Straightforward anyone in the team is able to easily go in and set up anything in Hotjar. The UI is really simple. Whenever you give feedback to Hotjar they continously take on board the feedback and improve the tool.
Read full review
Support Rating
Discontinued Products
Although it is a newer product to Adobe, they seem to truly care about our challenges and are very proactive in making sure that we have the most knowledgeable support available in a timely manner.
Read full review
Contentsquare
Hotjar is a SaaS-based company, and as such has a good support service. Users can quickly submit support tickets through Hotjar's online portal. Enterprise customers get access to additional support members and have SLAs to support their larger, more complex needs. Overall, Hotjar is extremely reliable and I've never had to reach out to customer support.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Discontinued Products
It was quite seamless with the outstanding support from our Adobe account manager.
Read full review
Contentsquare
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Discontinued Products
Adobe DTM provides a more secure data analytics solution. It is customized and best used on large scale deployments of websites with pages 10,000+. The Adobe Analytics tool, once learned, is very easy to use and provides more robust, customized graphics and ability to export data to "securely" via FTP from the cloud to SQL database.
Read full review
Contentsquare
HotJar was selected for a few reasons:
  • Video Capture - HotJars video capture of user sessions is nothing short of amazing. It is so useful (not to mention cool) to see, in real time, how users interact with our software. It makes our jobs so much easier and more enjoyable to get this type of d
  • User Surveys - The ease and flexibility of surveys we can make available on our website are an awesome tool to get additional data.
  • Simple implementation - Adding a very small amount of code to our website gives us the ability to use all of HotJars features without having to touch our code again.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Discontinued Products
  • The key factor is that my devs are not tied up with petty things like adding JS or advertising pixels. Simple work like that can be handled by me while they work on feature development.
  • Release cycle is much shorter when a dev is needed, say for a direct call rule that involves JS being written. We don't have to go through the normal release cycle and can do it on an ad hoc basis without all the rigmarole of a hot fix.
Read full review
Contentsquare
  • We have fixed many issues, for example, checkout usability problems with the video recording feature. You can catch bugs and get an overall idea of how a particular page is working.
  • Polls have helped us pair intent with the video sessions, so we can understand better why certain users answered different things. You get greedy and try to ask everything but that won't work. Keep it simple and it will give you small but important insights.
Read full review
ScreenShots