What users are saying about

Adobe Target

110 Ratings

Certona

2 Ratings

Adobe Target

110 Ratings
Score 7.7 out of 101

Certona

2 Ratings
Score 7.7 out of 101

Add comparison

Likelihood to Recommend

Adobe Target

1. We changed ship dates on individual product pages depending on customer location so they would have an accurate timeline for their orders. This really helped lower our volume of customer service calls on tracking orders.2. We have stores as well as an online presence. With Target we were able to advertise sales on b-stock items from our warehouse to our local customers without letting those that live outside a certain radius see the promo.3. If your marketing team doesn't have a tech background this software has a steep learning curve. There is quite a bit of manual configuration required. The image carousel is one example that we struggled with.
No photo available

Certona

Well-suited for companies that have a wide breadth of products or services to offer. For companies that want to personalize large amounts of the customer experience, Certona is well-suited. If you are only looking to do small amounts of personalization or do relatively non-complex personalization, Certona may be a bit pricier than is needed.
No photo available

Pros

  • Because the software is established there is lots of online help available and most of the bugs have been worked out
  • Adobe has a vast supply of resources if your pockets are deep enough.
  • The dashboard is easy to follow and is getting more user-friendly. You no longer have to be an HTML wizard to implement changes.
No photo available
  • Extensive testing opportunities with specifically dedicated resources on Certona's side
  • Account management is very committed to finding areas of opportunity and improvements
  • The strength of the algorithm used to drive personalization
  • Ability to create in-depth product reporting
No photo available

Cons

  • It relies on mbox and depending on how they are implemented, you may need to rely on your IT team to implement additional mboxes for certain tests.
  • To set up test offers, most of the time you will need to have knowledge of html and css. And depending on how the mboxes are implemented, you could be heavily relying on jQuery to manipulate the elements on your site for test offers.
  • There is no WYSIWYG interface for you to highlight elements on your site while creating offers, which could be useful for users with less front end development experience.
Leo Ko profile photo
  • User portal can be slow, especially with larger reports
  • While support is usually quick to resolve issues, new implementation can be held up in a queue for long periods of time
No photo available

Likelihood to Renew

Adobe Target6.3
Based on 24 answers
It's been working great for us even though it has its shortcomings, but it integrates well with other tools that we already have. Unless there is a tool that stands out from the crowd and offers much more benefit, we will be most likely to renew this software.
Leo Ko profile photo
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Usability

Adobe Target1.1
Based on 4 answers
Interface is intuitive and easy to use.
Bryant Hoopes profile photo
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Reliability and Availability

Adobe Target6.1
Based on 4 answers
i don't think we use the full functionalities of the tool, but to use the full functions, it's almost impossible (Too hard)
Petrik Oh profile photo
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Performance

Adobe Target8.0
Based on 3 answers
The bottleneck is never the software program
Brett Johnson profile photo
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Support

Adobe Target7.0
Based on 6 answers
Room for improvement
Richard Hayes profile photo
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

In-Person Training

Adobe Target8.1
Based on 3 answers
The instructor that came to train us was awesome and this training was very useful. I would recommend it for anyone who is going to be using this software. I only mark it lower because it is an added expense to an already expensive product, and a lot of the training covered the "Target" portion of the software (which again, we didn't use)
Sarah Schick profile photo
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Online Training

Adobe Target6.1
Based on 3 answers
The training was very easy to understand, however it would have been more useful to my development team than me. It was also primarily over-the-phone, which is never as easy to follow as in-person. We ended up scheduling and paying for an in-person training session to supplement the online/phone training because it wasn't helpful enough.
Sarah Schick profile photo
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Implementation

Adobe Target7.2
Based on 5 answers
Implementation was very slow and we didn't know the details or timeline until it had already been activated (so we missed our first period of use for the software).
Sarah Schick profile photo
No score
No answers yet
No answers on this topic

Alternatives Considered

We have looked at Optimizely but at this point are sticking with Test & Target. We like the integration it has with our Analytics tools such as Ad Hoc and SiteCatalyst. Also, we feel that Adobe has some interesting products that we would like to dig into in the future such as Audience Manager.
No photo available
Certona offered better pricing, a stronger data-based experience and algorithm-derived solution, and a better account management experience (based on customer feedback). Although the interface/portal for some of the other competitors was a little more user-friendly, we ultimately decided that it was worth compromising slightly on that aspect to get a product that was more robust overall.
No photo available

Return on Investment

  • Our site is primarily motivated to generate more traffic and conversions (leads) for our clients. In using this software, we had hoped to optimize our traffic and lead generating pieces so that we maximized signups.
Sarah Schick profile photo
  • Direct positive impact on total demand, as measured by the response rate of customers interacting with recommended products
  • Strong return on visual search product, which gives customers more views of the product during the search process
No photo available

Pricing Details

Adobe Target

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details

Certona

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details