AdSigner Email Signature vs. Email on Acid

AdSigner is well suited when you want to transform your simple signature into a marketing campaign. Enhancing the customer experience by bringing in more tech solutions into their environment. It will be less appropriate when communicating or collaborating internally with your co-workers.

Incentivized

Great for use during the QA process prior to launching new email marketing campaigns to identify inboxing issues, spam red flags, and inconsistent design across ESPs prior to sending. Not so great for creating emails - better suited for testing them as EOA doesn't integrate with marketing automation platforms, so you'd be doing double work.

Incentivized

• Generate email's personalized signatures
• Diverse Marketing Campaign Creations
• Let's you track performance

Incentivized

• Great intelligent HTML editor
• Great inbox preview rendering
• Excellent customer support

Incentivized

• Sometimes the information from CRM does not integrate well into AdSigner
• The capability of a google chrome extension
• Tiles viewing instead of list

Incentivized

• Poor interface via Blackbaud
• Speed
• Dark mode

Incentivized

AdSigner is much easier and organized. Easy to navigate

Incentivized

Email on Acid has more features than Litmus. They offer more email clients to test on and during my time using both tools, had fewer clients that displayed as being down. This was a major time suck especially when testing for specific clients such as Microsoft Outlook.

Incentivized

• Cloud updates are instant
• We had an accelerated revenue increase
• Live clicks analysis right on the banner

Incentivized

• It makes our quality assurance tests efficient
• Gives confidence to send strong deliverables to clients

Incentivized