Adthena vs. Nielsen Digital Ads Ratings

By using the share of search aspect of Adthena, I could see that although the SOS for one brand was high at this point in time compare to competitors, that the competitor had more growth in the last 3 months which identified a time to research in more depth to see as to why which I wouldn't have got if I used a platform which looks at the search volume as it stands and worked out the SOS manually.

Incentivized

I would definitely use Nielsen Digital Ads Ratings on all digital campaigns. This can work equally well for static digital campaigns as well as video digital campaigns. It helps digital buyers and planners with analysis at the end of campaigns and gives them results based on campaign criteria. It allows them to plan scenarios for future campaigns. It wouldn’t work so well on non-digital campaigns, but hopefully, in the future, it will allow for complete all channel analysis and data capture.

Incentivized

• Track and monitor spend and performance against competitors.
• Identify missed keyword opportunities.
• Informs our campaign and keyword budgeting/bidding on a daily basis.

Incentivized

• Accurate data set
• Robust results
• Large-scale data

Incentivized

• Slow performance.
• Ranking options are not detailed enough.

Incentivized

• Better integration
• Cross media report
• After sales support

Incentivized

Our Kantar rep is great and very responsive overall. It is hard to get on-site training and preferred pricing with them, but at the end of the day, I am helpful that they are around.

Incentivized

You see more insight (over time, period on period growth) and save time compared to platforms which looks at the search volume as it stands and you have to work out the SOS manually.

Incentivized

• Improved competitive analysis
• Insightful data that helps improve client trust
• Indentifying opportunities for keyword expansions

Incentivized

• Positive ROI on most digital campaigns
• Reduces the manual work
• Allows for more time planning

Incentivized