Advanced Time Management Attendance on Demand vs. PeopleGuru™

Advanced Time Management Attendance on Demand is so easy to use to track time worked, and categories time was worked in. It is not cumbersome as an employee and can be easily filled out in a snap while seeing totals. It is 100 times easier than any other time management tracking tool I've ever used.

Incentivized

I'd say PeopleGuru is well suited for most businesses -- a more significant (200+ employees) company may want to use something with a sleeker design. This provider is willing to work with cannabis businesses, which is unusual for payroll providers now.

Incentivized

• It allows its users to go back and check their time, see if there are any discrepancies, or if they forgot to clock in/out so that administration can be notified.
• It allows the administration to make sure employees aren't going over with their time, and if their written time sheets correlate to their digital time (with Advanced Time Management Attendance on Demand).
• It also allows the administration to see work times/flow and change/update staff schedules as needed.
• Allows employees to track their time off/vacation time and sick time.
• Advanced Time Management Attendance on Demand can be used on a computer or mobile device, which makes it convenient for everyone.

Incentivized

• One system for all human resource functions.
• Easy ticketing function if you have an issue with the software.
• Cost effective option.

Incentivized

• The time input sometimes doesn't load right away when hours are added. You have to wait a few seconds.
• PTO and other non-worked time are in a separate section, not a category to choose from.

Incentivized

• Position change future dating
• Timecard reporting including approval (multiple reports to show timecard with approval)
• W2 Reconciliation Reports (had to calculate wages to verify accuracy)
• Benefit Plan effective dating & how it affects the deduction effective dating (results in payroll errors if not careful)

Incentivized

Ease of use, helpfulness, easy to navigate, ability to use on any computer or mobile device.

Incentivized

The software is cost-effective and exceeds our needs compared to the previous software.

Incentivized

Very easy to use overall.

Incentivized

The software is intuitive and user friendly.

Incentivized

I have not interacted with Advanced Time Management Attendance on Demand's support team.

Incentivized

The customer service is great for the most part. There are a few issues with tax filings but overall I am pleased with the customer service provided by PeopleGuru.

Incentivized

The trainer was difficult to understand.

Incentivized

The implementation process was cumbersome and stressful. It took an extremely long time to complete this process. We had to learn a lot on the fly because this was the first implementation for all of us. The process would have been a lot easier if there was a third party that could assist with a lot of the work required to transfer and verify data.

Incentivized

I've heavily used BST Global and ProWorkflow, both of which are cumbersome in selecting where time was spent and adding it up correctly. It took hours each week to track my time. Now, it takes maybe 5 minutes with Advanced Time Management Attendance on Demand.

Incentivized

PeopleGuru is better than other cannabis-friendly payroll systems, like CheckWriters or MyPaperlessOffice (companies so small they were not available in your dropdown). It is not as good as bigger companies that are not cannabis-friendly, like ADP or Paylocity. ADP is super expensive but given the choice I would be with Paylocity over PeopleGuru.

Incentivized

• Advanced Time Management Attendance on Demand has allowed our company to keep our costs down by keeping overtime down. When employees and administration alike can track the hours worked per week, it really makes it easy for everyone.
• We really haven't seen any negative impact - the only negative is human error when employees forget to punch in or out, and it has to be manually corrected. But that isn't a programming problem, again, just human error.

Incentivized

• Less platforms that need to be managed or maintained
• Less platforms to pay monthly or annual fees for
• More costly than Gusto

Incentivized