What users are saying about
Top Rated
52 Ratings
6 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8 out of 101
Top Rated
52 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.2 out of 101

Add comparison

Likelihood to Recommend

Aerospike Database

Compared to Redis and memcacheD, high availibity is best from Aerospike. Load balancing is also well done through Aerospike. If you're doing K/V lookups data exceeds more than 1MB, then Aerospike definitely fits the bill. However, it is not best as a document store. It is really atrocious in that nature. If anything look @ Mongo or something else then.
Anson Abraham profile photo

Amazon DynamoDB

It is best for high demand over short periods of time and then being scaled down to save costs. This is kind of a pay for what you need model. This falls short though because while you can scale up unlimited you can only scale down 4 times a day which can be a limitation for some.
Adam Lauer profile photo

Feature Rating Comparison

NoSQL Databases

Aerospike Database
Amazon DynamoDB
7.9
Performance
Aerospike Database
Amazon DynamoDB
8.0
Availability
Aerospike Database
Amazon DynamoDB
8.4
Concurrency
Aerospike Database
Amazon DynamoDB
9.0
Security
Aerospike Database
Amazon DynamoDB
8.7
Scalability
Aerospike Database
Amazon DynamoDB
9.7
Data model flexibility
Aerospike Database
Amazon DynamoDB
4.0
Deployment model flexibility
Aerospike Database
Amazon DynamoDB
7.3

Pros

  • Scales really quickly and easily. Can deploy a new cluster or add to a cluster fairly quick.
  • MGMT UI is easy to use. Utilizing cli, makes it easy to "autoscale" for us.
  • The sharding removes any need to overlook to make sure if balanced correctly.
  • HA is dead simple, that almost little to no need figure out how to do it.
Anson Abraham profile photo
  • Fast retrieval
  • Auto scaling to control costs
  • Query and scanning allow for different use cases
Adam Lauer profile photo

Cons

  • Load balancing per network segments.
  • Reduction in price.
  • Cross datacenter replication usage isn't so straightforward. Sometimes cross dc replication can have issues of bad data..
Anson Abraham profile photo
  • Because of the lack of relations in AmazonDynamoDB, mapping very complex objects that you would typically decompose into related entities is difficult. Amazon DynamoDB is typically not great for this use case.
  • Amazon DynamoDB doesn't do strong type checking (there is typing, but it's relatively limited), so depending on your language you may have to expend some effort to properly map an Amazon DynamoDB object to a programmatical entity.
  • Depending on how much need you have for Amazon DynamoDB's performance, it can be a major pain to maintain... especially if you also have a relational database. In my current project, we utilize Amazon DynamoDB alongside PostgreSQL and entities live in one, the other, or both as appropriate. Synchronizing the database is a pain point.
Jordan Bayles profile photo

Likelihood to Renew

Aerospike Database8.0
Based on 1 answer
If money isn't an issue, and you're not on the cloud, then I'd go with Aerospike. If you're the cloud ie, aws or azure, then i'd stick with dynamoDB or Cosmos then. Aerospike is definitely not something you want to put into the cloud. It doesn't work well w/ cross regions. If cross DC, you'll have to write some stuff for data integrity checks.
Anson Abraham profile photo
Amazon DynamoDB7.0
Based on 13 answers
For non relational data, DynamoDB is my go-to datastore. It scales with my needs, and offers a price to performance ratio that is unmatched--especially when factoring in management time.
Alan Balasundaram profile photo

Alternatives Considered

Compared to the above for K/V lookups and writes, it is faster. However, less than 1 MB, i'd use Redis, if you're willing to write package for HA in Redis. However HA between Redis and aerospike, aerospike is top notch. K/V lookups were 20-30% faster than Redis, 50% faster than Mongo, and 45% faster than Cassandra. But again, aerospike is really expensive.
Anson Abraham profile photo
As a fully managed NoSQL service, DynamoDB provides a lot of functionality for relatively low cost. Scaling, sharding, throughput performance is managed for you, and you only pay for the bandwidth you provision.
Alan Balasundaram profile photo

Return on Investment

  • Less mgmt headaches, prompting time to focus on other issues.
  • HA, required little handholding. And minimization of downtime.
  • Cross region replication is not great, which sometimes requires data integrity checks on your end.
Anson Abraham profile photo
  • We were able to achieve our goal using Amazon – store every single email our system that has ever been sent in fluid database for long term recover without significantly impacting query times at scale.
  • We have been unable to effectively add additional features using the data set because of the pricing structure and incurred cost involved with performing repeated scans over the dataset.
Justin Schroeder profile photo

Pricing Details

Aerospike Database

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details

Amazon DynamoDB

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details