What users are saying about
10 Ratings
6 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8 out of 101
10 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 7.9 out of 101

Add comparison

Likelihood to Recommend

Aerospike Database

Compared to Redis and memcacheD, high availibity is best from Aerospike. Load balancing is also well done through Aerospike. If you're doing K/V lookups data exceeds more than 1MB, then Aerospike definitely fits the bill. However, it is not best as a document store. It is really atrocious in that nature. If anything look @ Mongo or something else then.
Anson Abraham profile photo

Riak

When I'm considering doing analysis on a large data set using machine learning algorithms, admittedly, Riak is not my first choice. I'd probably look into the idea of using something like Spark to run a distributed algorithm on my data. That means I'd have to copy data out of Riak into HDFS to run it. If you had good integration with Spark, that would be a welcome addition. That would save a lot of time in moving data between the Riak cluster and the HDFS cluster.
Jared Holmberg profile photo

Feature Rating Comparison

NoSQL Databases

Aerospike Database
Riak
9.4
Performance
Aerospike Database
Riak
9.0
Availability
Aerospike Database
Riak
10.0
Concurrency
Aerospike Database
Riak
10.0
Security
Aerospike Database
Riak
9.0
Scalability
Aerospike Database
Riak
10.0
Data model flexibility
Aerospike Database
Riak
9.0
Deployment model flexibility
Aerospike Database
Riak
9.0

Pros

  • Scales really quickly and easily. Can deploy a new cluster or add to a cluster fairly quick.
  • MGMT UI is easy to use. Utilizing cli, makes it easy to "autoscale" for us.
  • The sharding removes any need to overlook to make sure if balanced correctly.
  • HA is dead simple, that almost little to no need figure out how to do it.
Anson Abraham profile photo
  • If you're considering a NoSQL solution, one of Riak's strengths is that it is built to scale with very low management overhead. Compare Riak to something like HBase (requires a full Hadoop cluster, along with YARN, and Zookeeper), and you'll find it's much easier to set up and maintain.
  • Schemaless design in Riak makes it really easy to apply whatever design you like. Since you're not locked into seeing things just the SQL way, you've got more freedom with the type of data you store and the way you store it.
  • Riak is highly reliable. It's built on a platform that's meant to be incredibly resistant to failure. If you run in Riak in a cluster or cloud based environment, you can trust that it will be very dependable.
Jared Holmberg profile photo

Cons

  • Load balancing per network segments.
  • Reduction in price.
  • Cross datacenter replication usage isn't so straightforward. Sometimes cross dc replication can have issues of bad data..
Anson Abraham profile photo
  • At the time I was using Riak, data was stored as blobs so you couldn't query the data directly on the server. This has since been remedied with the addition of full-text search support.
Jared Holmberg profile photo

Likelihood to Renew

Aerospike Database8.0
Based on 1 answer
If money isn't an issue, and you're not on the cloud, then I'd go with Aerospike. If you're the cloud ie, aws or azure, then i'd stick with dynamoDB or Cosmos then. Aerospike is definitely not something you want to put into the cloud. It doesn't work well w/ cross regions. If cross DC, you'll have to write some stuff for data integrity checks.
Anson Abraham profile photo
Riak9.0
Based on 5 answers
Right now, I'm on a project where we need databases that can run on embedded systems. Riak isn't necessarily the best fit for that scenario. But when we need a clustered database, that's where we'd start considering Riak.
Jared Holmberg profile photo

Alternatives Considered

Compared to the above for K/V lookups and writes, it is faster. However, less than 1 MB, i'd use Redis, if you're willing to write package for HA in Redis. However HA between Redis and aerospike, aerospike is top notch. K/V lookups were 20-30% faster than Redis, 50% faster than Mongo, and 45% faster than Cassandra. But again, aerospike is really expensive.
Anson Abraham profile photo
Every database has positives and negatives. Redis is very good at set operations, but not as good at executing fast queries. MongoDB is a much cheaper data store than Riak, but not as highly available and scalable. Searching Riak is also faster than searching MongoDB or Redis. Riak also scales better than MongoDB in the long run.
Adam Stern profile photo

Return on Investment

  • Less mgmt headaches, prompting time to focus on other issues.
  • HA, required little handholding. And minimization of downtime.
  • Cross region replication is not great, which sometimes requires data integrity checks on your end.
Anson Abraham profile photo
  • Riak's simple API and simple management model made it a no brainer when it came to adopting it as a technology for the team.
Jared Holmberg profile photo

Pricing Details

Aerospike Database

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details

Riak

General
Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Entry-level set up fee?
No
Additional Pricing Details