Aerospike vs. Google Cloud SQL

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Aerospike
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
The Aerospike Real-time Data Platform aims to enable organizations to act instantly across billions of transactions while reducing server footprint up to 80%. The vendor states Aerospike multi-cloud platform powers real-time applications with predictable sub-millisecond performance up to petabyte scale with five-nines uptime with globally distributed, consistent data. Aerospike boasts customers such as Airtel, Experian, European Central Bank, Nielsen, PayPal, Snap, Verizon Media and Wayfair.N/A
Google Cloud SQL
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Google Cloud SQL is a database-as-a-service (DBaaS) with the capability and functionality of MySQL.
$0
per core hour
Pricing
AerospikeGoogle Cloud SQL
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
License - Express
$0
per core hour
License - Web
$0.01134
per core hour
Storage - for backups
$.08
per month per GB
HA Storage - for backups
$.08
per month per GB
Storage - HDD storage capacity
$.09
per month per GB
License - Standard
$0.13
per core hour
Storage - SSD storage capacity
$.17
per month per GB
HA Storage - HDD storage capacity
$.18
per month per GB
HA Storage - SSD storage capacity
$.34
per month per GB
License - Enterprise
$0.47
per core hour
Memory
$5.11
per month per GB
HA Memory
$10.22
per month per GB
vCPUs
$30.15
per month per vCPU
HA vCPUs
$60.30
per month per vCPU
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AerospikeGoogle Cloud SQL
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPricing varies with editions, engine, and settings, including how much storage, memory, and CPU you provision. Cloud SQL offers per-second billing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
AerospikeGoogle Cloud SQL
Features
AerospikeGoogle Cloud SQL
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
Aerospike
9.9
3 Ratings
11% above category average
Google Cloud SQL
-
Ratings
Performance10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Concurrency10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Security10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Data model flexibility10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Database-as-a-Service
Comparison of Database-as-a-Service features of Product A and Product B
Aerospike
-
Ratings
Google Cloud SQL
8.9
26 Ratings
2% above category average
Automatic software patching00 Ratings9.612 Ratings
Database scalability00 Ratings9.026 Ratings
Automated backups00 Ratings9.326 Ratings
Database security provisions00 Ratings8.326 Ratings
Monitoring and metrics00 Ratings8.525 Ratings
Automatic host deployment00 Ratings9.012 Ratings
Best Alternatives
AerospikeGoogle Cloud SQL
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.5 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.5 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.5 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.5 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 7.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
AerospikeGoogle Cloud SQL
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(4 ratings)
9.1
(25 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
7.0
(3 ratings)
8.3
(7 ratings)
Support Rating
8.9
(2 ratings)
6.4
(4 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.6
(6 ratings)
User Testimonials
AerospikeGoogle Cloud SQL
Likelihood to Recommend
Aerospike Inc
We were developing an advertisement time auction application, where we had to store the client's personal details, advertisement-related details, location, and many other details. Moreover, we required a promotion, cookies, and a few more details from the front end. All this information is heavy in terms of size and cannot be lost if the server crash. So, we required an extremely fast disk database with high scalability and low throughput.
Read full review
Google
Although Google Cloud SQL has room for improvement by addressing a minor lack of features, its features and services keep it high among other SQL database products. It is very fast compared to others. Since it is cloud-based, maintenance is also easier. Integration capabilities are also more than expected.
Read full review
Pros
Aerospike Inc
  • Low latency
  • Stable
  • Highly configurable
  • increasing features
Read full review
Google
  • It has a easily and user understandable interface which provides it every necessary feature to come up with.
  • It's backend is very strong that can help us to run big quieres without any hesitation.
  • It's integration with other tools are one of the powerful feature which makes it more suitable to use.
Read full review
Cons
Aerospike Inc
  • Load balancing per network segments.
  • Reduction in price.
  • Cross datacenter replication usage isn't so straightforward. Sometimes cross dc replication can have issues of bad data..
Read full review
Google
  • Increasing support for more database engines may enable a wider range of application needs to be met.
  • Implementing and updating cutting-edge security features on a constant basis.
  • Streamlining and enhancing the tools for transferring data to Google Cloud SQL from on-premises databases or other cloud providers.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Aerospike Inc
If money isn't an issue, and you're not on the cloud, then I'd go with Aerospike. If you're the cloud ie, aws or azure, then i'd stick with dynamoDB or Cosmos then. Aerospike is definitely not something you want to put into the cloud. It doesn't work well w/ cross regions. If cross DC, you'll have to write some stuff for data integrity checks.
Read full review
Google
No answers on this topic
Usability
Aerospike Inc
Could be easier to use and install. Also developer experience needs some work
Read full review
Google
Everything is great about using Google Cloud SQL, but I only dock marks for requiring the Cloud Auth Proxy to connect locally without using allowed networks. I get that it's necessary since it's behind a VPC but it's just a bit clunky to use. That being said, I wouldn't really call that a big deciding factor for Google Cloud SQL's usability.
Read full review
Support Rating
Aerospike Inc
We used the community edition.
Read full review
Google
GCP support in general requires a support agreement. For small organizations like us, this is not affordable or reasonable. It would help if Google had a support mechanism for smaller organizations. It was a steep learning curve for us because this was our first entry into the cloud database world. Better documentation also would have helped.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Aerospike Inc
Aerospike is much more performant than MongoDB, however there is much greater community adoption and support for mongo
Read full review
Google
In our experience, we were down for almost a day, because Database Engineers at Rackspace weren't able to understand or provide a solution, and when they did, they had to recreate the database from the scratch. On a server, this is time consuming. When we faced a similar scenario on Google Cloud SQL it was as easy as to recover from the last image through the console. We were back up in less than 30 minutes. Such a solution, saves you money by reducing churn and keeping the business operating.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Aerospike Inc
  • Being able to power the same workload on a fraction of the servers has led to better ROI for my application.
  • Less servers needed also meant less time to manage the cluster, leading to savings in engineering time
Read full review
Google
  • With managed database system, it has given us near 100% data availability
  • It has also improved web layer experience with faster processing and authentication using database fields
  • Google Cloud SQL also gels up well with Google Analytics and other analytics systems for us to join up different data points and process them for deeper dives and analysis
Read full review
ScreenShots

Google Cloud SQL Screenshots

Screenshot of migrating to a fully managed database solution - Self-managing a database, such as MySQL, PostgreSQL, or SQL Server, can be inefficient and expensive, with significant effort around patching, hardware maintenance, backups, and tuning. Migrating to a fully managed solution can be done using a Database Migration Service with minimal downtime.Screenshot of data-driven application development - Cloud SQL accelerates application development via integration with the larger ecosystem of Google Cloud services, Google partners, and the open source community.