AgileOne AccelerationVMS vs. ATOSS Staff Efficiency Suite

With so many agencies submitting candidates and only a few being reviewed at a time the chance of a candidate making it to a review and in front of a hiring manager is low.

Incentivized

ATOSS is well suited for companies working with different work patterns and on different sites. It is also possible to block the changes for the past, which is really useful if payroll is centralized. The interfaces work with multiple systems as well. But in order to avoid having a huge database, it has to be carefully cleaned from time to time by a system admin, especially if you give access to multiple persons.

Incentivized

• Flexibility on the configuration
• Security role access management

Incentivized

• There are so many other agencies submitting candidates it is hard to make a placement
• Only a few candidates are reviewed at a time and sent to the hiring managers
• Lack of feedback

Incentivized

• Reports are not so easy to use.
• No document upload.
• Some specific balances needed for our business are not easy to manage.

Incentivized

We have made several placements through Fieldglass - not sure how their review process differs from Agile-1

Incentivized

This tool is suited for any airline company and based on a market benchmark done in 2009, we selected it as it was the only software that meets our requirements.

Incentivized

• Have not made a placement through Agile-1 yet
• Lack of feedback leaves us wondering why our candidate was not a fit

Incentivized

• Less paper/Excel sheets: everything is centralized in the system
• Time saving
• Better communication: information is accessible faster and everywhere for the employees

Incentivized