AgileOne AccelerationVMS vs. Guru.com

With so many agencies submitting candidates and only a few being reviewed at a time the chance of a candidate making it to a review and in front of a hiring manager is low.

Incentivized

VERY useful for small companies where one person does an entire job/task. May be less useful for larger companies, as it would be difficult to maintain, and there are usually teams to cover the slack. Also good for tech purposes. Our tech people constantly create Guru cards in order to help us learn to do back-end things.

Incentivized

• The segmentation of information into Collections, boards and individual cards allows you to keep a good control and organization of information contained within.
• An add-on app for Slack and a Chrome extension mean you don't even need to have the Guru.com site open to still be able to access all of your stored information.
• The ability to allow some or all users to create & edit cards adds value and strengthens the team collaboration.

Incentivized

• There are so many other agencies submitting candidates it is hard to make a placement
• Only a few candidates are reviewed at a time and sent to the hiring managers
• Lack of feedback

Incentivized

• Relatively high fees taken out of earnings
• Fake clients still get through, which causes a headache
• Having to pay to get your bid higher up in the list of freelancers makes it even more costly

Incentivized

We have made several placements through Fieldglass - not sure how their review process differs from Agile-1

Incentivized

• Have not made a placement through Agile-1 yet
• Lack of feedback leaves us wondering why our candidate was not a fit

Incentivized

• Great for resolving tech related issues.
• Great for cross-training.

Incentivized