AgileOne AccelerationVMS vs. Turing.com

With so many agencies submitting candidates and only a few being reviewed at a time the chance of a candidate making it to a review and in front of a hiring manager is low.

Incentivized

I would rate Turing much higher if they had viable candidates that were US residents. Their candidates are qualified, but unusable in most companies.

Incentivized

• They are very transparent.
• They were very informative with their vetting process.
• They have very qualified candidates, but not in the United States.

Incentivized

• There are so many other agencies submitting candidates it is hard to make a placement
• Only a few candidates are reviewed at a time and sent to the hiring managers
• Lack of feedback

Incentivized

• Turing needs to provide US candidates.
• They need to be more transparent in their advertising.
• They need to provide more viable options.

Incentivized

We have made several placements through Fieldglass - not sure how their review process differs from Agile-1

Incentivized

Honestly, As I stated, Turing was a total waste of my and my company's time. We cannot employ outside of the US or Canada, even though an agency like this. If they were upfront about what they truly are, and overseas employment agency, I would have never signed up for it.

Incentivized

• Have not made a placement through Agile-1 yet
• Lack of feedback leaves us wondering why our candidate was not a fit

Incentivized

• Honestly, none.
• Turing was a complete waste of my and my company's time. Nothing they did but they were not transparent upfront on the residency of their developers.

Incentivized