Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management vs. Coda

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Agiloft’s Contract Lifecycle Management solution is contract management software for managing the complete contract lifecycle, streamlining the approval process, and integrating contract information into all relevant business processes.N/A
Coda
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
Coda, from Coda Project headquartered in San Francisco, is a template-based document generation solution, supporting a variety of use cases presented by the vendor as ideal for smaller companies that might otherwise be relying on spreadsheets to maintain (for instance) product development, or inventory tracking. It is available free, with paid editions to support teams, automations, or for more advanced collaboration and workspace features, as well as more advanced security features.
$0
per month
Pricing
Agiloft Contract Lifecycle ManagementCoda
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free
$0.00
per month
Pro
$10.00
per month per doc maker; unlimited editors (paid annually)
Team
$30.00
per month per doc maker; unlimited editors (paid annually)
Enterprise
Custom Pricing
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Agiloft Contract Lifecycle ManagementCoda
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeRequiredNo setup fee
Additional DetailsWith Coda, you only pay for Doc Makers. Often one person creates a doc, others edit it, and some simply observe from afar. Instead of charging for everyone, we only charge for the people who create docs. Interested in enterprise pricing? Visit coda.io/enterprise
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Agiloft Contract Lifecycle ManagementCoda
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Agiloft Contract Lifecycle ManagementCoda
Contract Authoring
Comparison of Contract Authoring features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management
8.8
3 Ratings
7% above category average
Coda
-
Ratings
Contract creation8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract templates10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Clause library/saved fields9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Guided logic8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Collaboration
Comparison of Contract Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management
9.7
3 Ratings
15% above category average
Coda
-
Ratings
Contract sharing10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract editing10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaborating on contracts10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
MS Word plug-in10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Approval process9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Interdepartmental workflows9.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract Monitoring
Comparison of Contract Monitoring features of Product A and Product B
Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management
9.4
3 Ratings
10% above category average
Coda
-
Ratings
Contract database10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract search10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Contract milestone reminders & alerts10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom contract reports10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Tracking contract status10.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Compliance check7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Agiloft Contract Lifecycle ManagementCoda
Small Businesses
PandaDoc
PandaDoc
Score 8.9 out of 10
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.7 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
PandaDoc
PandaDoc
Score 8.9 out of 10
MSB Docs
MSB Docs
Score 9.6 out of 10
Enterprises
DocuSign CLM
DocuSign CLM
Score 8.6 out of 10
M‑Files
M‑Files
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Agiloft Contract Lifecycle ManagementCoda
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(3 ratings)
8.4
(24 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
10.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
Usability
10.0
(1 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
7.8
(2 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
4.5
(1 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
7.3
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Agiloft Contract Lifecycle ManagementCoda
Likelihood to Recommend
Agiloft
It is useful for contract management as it is supposed to be. I like the new interface a lot. It looks much more modern now. It is not as easy to manage documents that are not contracts. We tried to use the software as a vendor management solution, but eventually, the company decided to use another software instead. It needed customizations for our use case, which we could not afford to spend time on.
Read full review
Coda
Coda is great to build a place for your users to go to and see information. It is easy to navigate through and the variety of content creation is great. However, it is not always easy to create what you want and there is a lot of playing around and learning. Coda also sometimes misses some functionality which is expected. For example, downloading a list of users that have access to the platform. Being able to send push notifications when a new page has been created etc. Overall it is a good tool to use just be prepared to invest time!
Read full review
Pros
Agiloft
  • Categorizing data based on your specific business needs.
  • Comparing documents and identifying risk.
  • Workflow management and visibility into state of things.
Read full review
Coda
  • Flexibility. It's easy to get started on a small scale, but add more complex organization strategies as needed.
  • Integrations. It's simple to ingest data from sources like Zapier for time-saving automations.
  • Useful components. View table data across different formats like cards or custom detail views.
Read full review
Cons
Agiloft
  • It would be nice if there were a way to upload an executed agreement and have the system pull the details into the contract record.
  • Maybe having a "themes" option so that individual users could pick a color scheme/layout that worked best for them.
  • Having a Chat feature could be helpful instead of sending internal emails.
Read full review
Coda
  • It takes getting used to in terms of how the formulas per column is implemented, in contrast to how we build tables in Excel. For organization/team purchase, it would be worth considering having a training for the core team of users. Right now, we do a lot of self-learning.
  • Inability to email charts or image without these objects being hosted on a third party. The community has been great in providing workarounds but it would be much more convenient to be able to have such ability natively.
  • APAC Support. I'm based in Malaysia, due to timezone differences, even with a livechat implemented, the support for each step and conversation takes up to 24 hours per response. Having some hours covered in our timezone would greatly improve customer support experience.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Agiloft
The current functionality is excellent and we keep getting request for more. Leadership wants to make this a one stop shop.
Read full review
Coda
Coda is definitely something that has been proven to drive positive impact in our organization. We have many divisions that can benefit from this that we have yet to explore. It would definitely be worth renewing.
Read full review
Usability
Agiloft
Nice and simple interface. The software does its job well. It is not a central software for company operations, but it makes it significantly easier for multiple departments to operate. Regular updates and communication about them are the best part of the software and I would recommend it for other departments should the need arise. One major benefit I have found of Agiloft is scalability. As the company grows, the number of contracts grows almost exponentially. Agiloft allows handling them easily without having to reorganize old contracts.
Read full review
Coda
Coda can seem either really useful or really useless. The extremes of both ends is driven by what our own understanding of what we want to implement. If we lack this understanding, it will be easy to misunderstand Coda's usability especially in the wrong context.
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Agiloft
No answers on this topic
Coda
So far in the past year, we haven't had situations that Coda has gone down for us which is great.
Read full review
Performance
Agiloft
No answers on this topic
Coda
We haven't done any integrations - the initial part of our experience we found that for docs with complex formulas, the page tends to load slowly but in recent months, Coda has improved and optimized the loading times in general and we generally don't find any problems in terms of speed anymore.
Read full review
Support Rating
Agiloft
Implementation was relatively easy and I have not had any issues with the support. UI change created some challenges for the end-users, but overall, it was a smooth experience. I hope the company will continue investing in the product and not consider it as something to not care about too much. I believe Agiloft does not make any other software, so I think the focus on it should not wane.
Read full review
Coda
Mainly due to timezone differences. I think Coda's support in general is well implemented and executed. They know their stuff and are helpful. But since I'm not in the same timezone, solution rates are slower for me, and that's not something I prefer. I work in customer service, too, and more often than not, time is important. Shortening the solution time would be a much greater experience.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Agiloft
No answers on this topic
Coda
I'm relatively inexperienced but this experience is meaningful. It would have been nice to have some guidance from Coda so that we understood more on Coda's purpose and potential.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Agiloft
Prior to implementing Agiloft, we used ProLaw. ProLaw acts as an electronic library for all contracts across the company. We were able to get this to work for us but it was limited in what functionality it provided. Agiloft is far superior when it comes to tracking and contract generation. Both systems store the agreements; however, Agiloft does a lot of the work for us. It creates the agreements with the click of a button, manages user permissions, sends automated reminders without requiring setup. These are all things ProLaw either didn't have or had but required manual entry. I was not the one who selected Agiloft as our new system, but after using it I can see why it was chosen.
Read full review
Coda
While all of the products listed have great features and platforms, there was always one thing missing from them that I would need to get from another application. Coda was the first one we used that really combined some of the best parts of those products and allowed us to use it in one place. I also appreciate the flexibility of creating your own framework and workflow, unlike in other tools where you have to follow how they capture data and organize projects.
Read full review
Scalability
Agiloft
No answers on this topic
Coda
I think scalability is definitely good here since it's based on number of doc makers. Implementation into each dept becomes simpler. That being said, due to the nature of our work, we find it easier that we have a "super user" and then a team of other doc makers. This would make the doc creation and management more efficient.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Agiloft
  • Better ability to find the contract you are looking for.
  • Broke even within 8 months of switching to Agiloft even with implementation fees.
  • Document compare saves time and mistakes.
Read full review
Coda
  • Increased insight for all stakeholders involved--both in terms of overview and details
  • Better grip on issues and escalations--reduced friction, confusion, and higher clarity on status, next actions, and ownership.
  • Reduced time required by those who need to maintain all information. Record (a detail) once and use multiple times.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Agiloft Contract Lifecycle Management Screenshots

Screenshot of Customizable Contract Manager HomepageScreenshot of Secure contract repository with full text searchScreenshot of Graphical workflow editor allows you to define your contract workflow without writing a line of code.

Coda Screenshots

Screenshot of One unified surface means ideas aren’t limited to a file type. A project doesn’t have to be split across tabs of documents, spreadsheets, and apps.Screenshot of Packs are a version of integrations or plug-ins. They connect the  doc to the apps in use every day, so as to pull live data in or push updates out automatically.Screenshot of Drag-and-drop templates provide a quick-start shortcut to commonly used templates like Upvote/Downvote, To-Do List, and Team Sentiment Tracker.Screenshot of Slice, dice, and chop data using Views. A View is a mirror of data that can be tailored to unique needs, all while staying connected to the source.Screenshot of When accessing the doc from a mobile device, it should feel like an app. Doc pages become tabs, buttons become swipe actions and doc notifications become push notifications.Screenshot of The Doc Gallery contains docs self-published by the Coda community. These published docs have a webpage-like interface and have varying levels of interactivity like view, play or edit. Find and share tools, templates, tiny apps, interactive handbooks, and anything else that can be built in Coda.