Alcatel-Lucent OmniAccess Wireless Access Points vs. Lumen Managed Enterprise with Cisco Meraki

One of best use cases for using OmniAccess Wire Access Point is where we have dense no. of users as client associated capacity is very good. Also one of the use case is when administrator wants different PSK for each user for authentication. OmniAccess WAP supports in better way.

It is ideal to have a fast, secure, and very stable 4g Wi-Fi network to expand the range of connectivity for users and increase the productivity and efficiency of work teams. It is not so good to implement it quickly as you need to learn how to use it very efficiently it is not plugged and played.

Incentivized

• Flexibility in terms of deployment, management
• Better security feature
• Application awareness ,WIPS
• DPSK
• Better client associated count

• Cyber attack protection.
• Fast and stable Wi-Fi connection.
• Anti-Virus and Anti-Phishing.

Incentivized

• No of Interfaces
• must have a variety in terms of MIMO
• better throughput

• Customer service in multiple languages.
• More price options.
• Better training or be more intuitive.

Incentivized

Have used Cisco Meraki access point earlier having management on cloud and is on license (subscription basis). But Alcatel OmniAccess Points have management on cloud, on premise as well which means to say flexibility in terms of management. We had one requirement where we number of user is large which is going to connect on access point but Cisco Meraki only supports 200 users per radio whereas OmniAccess point have better client associated capacity with 524 per radio.

I have not tried another service like this.

Incentivized

• Better Roaming
• Ease of Management
• Better performance

• Higher productivity.
• Better interaction with the cloud.
• Improve income.

Incentivized