amazee.io vs. Contentstack

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
amazee.io
Score 6.8 out of 10
N/A
amazee.io presents a ZeroOps application delivery hub for engineering teams to deploy applications more easily. The developer-centric, open source platform aims to minimize the stress of managing infrastructure or operations. amazee.io supports organizations to accelerate their cloud and container adoption, along with providing managed Kubernetes for developer teams.
$199
per month
Contentstack
Score 7.9 out of 10
N/A
Contentstack headquartered in San Francisco offers an API-first headless CMS. From desktops to smart phones, from kiosks to smart watches, from billboards to jumbotrons, from dashboards to VR headsets – content is delivered with the push of a button and optimized for every screen, device and channel.N/A
Pricing
amazee.ioContentstack
Editions & Modules
Cloud Basic
$199
per month Every additional project $30 per month
Cloud Professional
$399
per month Every additional project $100 per month
Dedicated Cloud
Custom
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
amazee.ioContentstack
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesYes
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
amazee.ioContentstack
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
amazee.ioContentstack
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
amazee.io
-
Ratings
Contentstack
7.7
11 Ratings
4% below category average
Role-based user permissions00 Ratings7.711 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
amazee.io
-
Ratings
Contentstack
8.1
10 Ratings
5% above category average
API00 Ratings8.29 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language00 Ratings8.18 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
amazee.io
-
Ratings
Contentstack
8.2
12 Ratings
8% above category average
WYSIWYG editor00 Ratings8.22 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Admin section00 Ratings7.812 Ratings
Page templates00 Ratings7.38 Ratings
Library of website themes00 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design00 Ratings6.79 Ratings
Publishing workflow00 Ratings7.710 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
amazee.io
-
Ratings
Contentstack
6.6
12 Ratings
11% below category average
Content taxonomy00 Ratings7.510 Ratings
SEO support00 Ratings6.910 Ratings
Bulk management00 Ratings6.49 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions00 Ratings6.48 Ratings
Community / comment management00 Ratings5.96 Ratings
Best Alternatives
amazee.ioContentstack
Small Businesses
ManageWP
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Divi
Divi
Score 9.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Pantheon
Pantheon
Score 8.4 out of 10
Image Relay
Image Relay
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Pantheon
Pantheon
Score 8.4 out of 10
Tridion
Tridion
Score 9.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
amazee.ioContentstack
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(1 ratings)
7.8
(12 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.1
(9 ratings)
User Testimonials
amazee.ioContentstack
Likelihood to Recommend
Mirantis
Code management and integrated of this tool with open source like GitHub file format will save the time which can be used in a effective way and helps to develop the solution for the better world. Also the scalability as per the increased load we have the option to increase the processing power as per the load
Read full review
Contentstack
Contentstack has flexible functionality which opens up a lot of possibilities for businesses with proactive web development teams to create their own website builder app to compete with 3rd party agencies. This is especially useful in a large enterprise where non-technical teams often turn to expensive outside agencies which cost more in the long run than an up-front investment into an in-house application.
Read full review
Pros
Mirantis
  • Code management
  • Setting up IDE for code
  • Interaction with API
Read full review
Contentstack
  • Enables us to build and architect content through the use of their easy to use software and user interface.
  • Customer service has been by far the most reliable and responsive in any vendor i've dealt with.
  • Listens to feedback and builds features and technical improvements that helps customers usability and experience.
Read full review
Cons
Mirantis
  • The GUI interface can be more advanced
  • Can be enhanced with AI auto code similar to GitHub pilot
  • Support multi platform to run in all operating system
Read full review
Contentstack
  • In my opinion it's not very intuitive. I've found its difficult to understand how to best structure entries, especially if they are related
  • In my experience, entries can get difficult to understand if weren't the creator. It would be helpful to have some meta data around the entry itself and the fields within them in my opinion.
  • Integration with an A/B testing platform would be nice.
Read full review
Support Rating
Mirantis
No answers on this topic
Contentstack
They have an in-app chat with their support team, who is always quick to respond and provide helpful answers. I've never walked away from an interaction without my issue being solved quickly and easily. They're also very communicative over email and are sure to follow up after any changes are made to ensure we're seeing the desired result. They are always very professional and easy to work with.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Mirantis
There are multiple options in amazee that can be used in the product in terms of scalability and usage. Secondly this is much better product in terms of deploying the code as the same code can be used by the multiple applications by using the concept of load sharing. This helps in scalability of business
Read full review
Contentstack
Contentstack has better international hosting support then Contentful and we found the presales and sales support people were MUCH more responsive than Contentful. The Sitecore sales process was very very slow and overly complex. We felt Sitecore had many features that were not valuable and the cost to benefit ratio was much lower compared to ContentStack
Read full review
Return on Investment
Mirantis
  • Scalability increase the Business
  • Multi platform is still under progress
  • Easy to deploy in cloud infrastructure
Read full review
Contentstack
  • Saved significant amounts of money that would previously been spent on 3rd party agencies to build websites
  • Empowered Comms teams to create and edit the design and content of their own websites on demand rather than relying on the Dev team
  • Allowed the Development team to concentrate on building functionality rather than websites, so we can focus on improvement rather than BAU work.
Read full review
ScreenShots