Amazon FSx vs. IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers
Amazon FSx vs. IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers
Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
---|---|---|---|---|
Amazon FSx | N/A | Amazon FSx is a cloud storage service designed to make it easy and cost effective to launch, run, and scale feature-rich, high-performance file systems in the cloud. It supports a range of workloads boasting reliability, security, scalability, and broad set of capabilities. As a fully managed service, it handles hardware provisioning, patching, and backups, and supports four widely-used file systems: NetApp ONTAP, OpenZFS, Windows File Server, and Lustre. | N/A | |
IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers | N/A | IBM Cloud bare metal servers are cloud servers configurable in hourly/monthly options, on-demand, from any location—with a selection of standard features and services for small businesses and enterprise demands. Users can customize RAM and SSDs with 11M+ configurations from which to choose. | $0.51 per hour |
Amazon FSx | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
Additional Details | — | IBM Bare Metal Servers offer a choice between hourly or monthly pre-configured servers or can be customized with single to quad processing solutions. Bare metal servers are available worldwide and with no monthly contracts. Amonthly bare metal server built to spec can be ordered and made available in two to four hours—with 500 GB/month outbound bandwidth included. An hourly bare metal server can be ordered, and it is made ready for in 20 to 30 minutes. Public outbound bandwidth is charged per gigabyte. | ||||||||||||||
More Pricing Information |
Amazon FSx | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers | |
---|---|---|
Top Pros |
| |
Top Cons |
|
|
Amazon FSx | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
File Sharing & Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud Storage Security & Administration |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cloud Storage Platform |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) |
|
Amazon FSx | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers | |
---|---|---|
Small Businesses | SugarSync Score 10.0 out of 10 | Linode Score 9.0 out of 10 |
Medium-sized Companies | Druva Data Resiliency Cloud Score 9.6 out of 10 | SAP on IBM Cloud Score 9.1 out of 10 |
Enterprises | Druva Data Resiliency Cloud Score 9.6 out of 10 | SAP on IBM Cloud Score 9.1 out of 10 |
All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
Amazon FSx | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | 9.9 (2 ratings) | 8.6 (82 ratings) |
Support Rating | - (0 ratings) | 7.3 (9 ratings) |
Implementation Rating | - (0 ratings) | 8.0 (23 ratings) |
Amazon FSx | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers | |
---|---|---|
Likelihood to Recommend | Amazon AWS | IBM |
Pros | Amazon AWS | IBM |
Cons | Amazon AWS | IBM |
Likelihood to Renew | Amazon AWS No answers on this topic | IBM |
Support Rating | Amazon AWS No answers on this topic | IBM |
Implementation Rating | Amazon AWS No answers on this topic | IBM |
Alternatives Considered | Amazon AWS | IBM |
Return on Investment | Amazon AWS | IBM |
ScreenShots | IBM Cloud Bare Metal Servers Screenshots |