Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Axcient x360Cloud

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon S3 Glacier
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
The Amazon S3 Glacier storage classes are purpose-built for data archiving, providing a low cost archive storage in the cloud. According to AWS, S3 Glacier storage classes provide virtually unlimited scalability and are designed for 99.999999999% (11 nines) of data durability, and they provide fast access to archive data and low cost.
$0
Per GB Per Month
Axcient x360Cloud
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
Axcient CloudFinder (formerly from eFolder) is a cloud service (e.g. Office 365) backup service.N/A
Pricing
Amazon S3 GlacierAxcient x360Cloud
Editions & Modules
Bulk Retrieval Pricing
$0.0025
Per GB Per Month
Storage Pricing
$0.004
Per GB Per Month
Retrieval Pricing
$0.01
Per GB Per Month
Expedited Retrieval Pricing
$0.03
Per GB Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon S3 GlacierAxcient x360Cloud
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon S3 GlacierAxcient x360Cloud
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Amazon S3 GlacierAxcient x360Cloud
SaaS Backup
Comparison of SaaS Backup features of Product A and Product B
Amazon S3 Glacier
-
Ratings
Axcient x360Cloud
8.4
1 Ratings
5% below category average
SaaS Product Integration00 Ratings8.21 Ratings
Multiple Data Restoration Options00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Data Auditing and Search00 Ratings7.31 Ratings
Data Storage in the Cloud or On-Premises00 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon S3 GlacierAxcient x360Cloud
Small Businesses
Barracuda Essentials
Barracuda Essentials
Score 9.2 out of 10
NAKIVO Backup & Replication
NAKIVO Backup & Replication
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Barracuda Essentials
Barracuda Essentials
Score 9.2 out of 10
Spanning Backup
Spanning Backup
Score 9.5 out of 10
Enterprises
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 8.6 out of 10
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
Score 9.6 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon S3 GlacierAxcient x360Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(7 ratings)
8.6
(3 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon S3 GlacierAxcient x360Cloud
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
If your organization has a lot of archival data that it needs to be backed up for safekeeping, where it won't be touched except in a dire emergency, Amazon Glacier is perfect. In our case, we had a client that generates many TB of video and photo data at annual events and wanted to retain ALL of it, pre- and post- edit for potential use in a future museum. Using the Snowball device, we were able to move hundreds of TB of existing media data that was previously housed on multiple Thunderbolt drives, external RAIDs, etc, in an organized manner, to Amazon Glacier. Then, we were able to setup CloudBerry Backup on their production computers to continually backup any new media that they generated during their annual events.
Read full review
Axcient
We've had the best experiences when needing to recover emails from snapshots and date ranges which have been deleted. The Smart Search works relatively well and is easy to recover. Sometimes the restoration process can take a while depending on the size and amount of emails but is generally ok.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • Cheap storage of backup data.
  • Can be used as a part of the entire suite of tools from Amazon, without requiring you to leave the familiar stack.
Read full review
Axcient
  • Service Options
  • Bring your own hardware
  • pricing was some of the most competitive
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • Accessing data stored in Glacier is slow. That shouldn't be a surprise, but it is undesirable nonetheless.
  • Retrieving a large amount of data can be expensive; Glacier's intended use is as an archive of rarely-accessed data.
  • Some users regard Glacier with fear and uncertainty. Slow retrieval time and high retrieval cost are the greatest risks of using Glacier, and they are also the Glacier interaction that most users have the least experience with.
Read full review
Axcient
  • Improvements in ticket resolution
  • Improvements in website/portal functionality
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
It is difficult to delete the data as you have to wait for inventory and then bucket modification has to expire.
Read full review
Axcient
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
Since the rest of our infrastructure is in Amazon AWS, coding for sending data to Glacier just makes sense. The others are great as well, for their specific needs and uses, but having *another* third-party software to manage, be billed for, and learn/utilize can be costly in money and time.
Read full review
Axcient
The performance and GUI for the previous products were inferior to Axcient's x360Cloud. The price was comparable but we were spending too much time trying to maintain and improve the product which was costing us time in productivity. The feature set was also not as good as what x360Cloud is providing.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • Helped us meet compliance requirements while minimizing costs.
  • Simple integration with almost no changes required to our existing S3 management policies.
Read full review
Axcient
  • Competitive pricing for MSP's
  • Client support was top notch and they insured we were able to implement quickly
  • Agent deployment was simple and smoth
Read full review
ScreenShots