Likelihood to Recommend Amazon Kinesis is a great replacement for Kafka and it works better whenever the components of the solution are AWS based.
Best if extended fan-out is not required, but still price-performance ratio is very good for simplifying maintenance. I would go with a different option if the systems to be connected are legacy, for instance in the case of traditional messaging clients.
Read full review If you have a need to stream data, real time or segmented structured data then Confluent is a great platform to do so with. You won't run into packet transfer size limitations that other platforms have. Flexibility in on-prem, cloud, and managed cloud offerings makes it very flexible no matter how you choose to implement.
Read full review Pros Processing huge loads of data Integrating well with IoT Platform on Amazon Integration with overall AWS Ecosystem Scalability Read full review Products work great. Training is available. Customer support is good. Read full review Cons Not a queue system, so little visibility into "backlog" if there is any Confusing terminology to make sure events aren't missed Sometimes didn't seem to trigger Lambda functions, or dropped events when a lot came in Read full review Cloud based Azure platform features for Confluent lacks behind AWS And GCP Read full review Support Rating The documentation was confusing and lacked examples. The streams suddenly stopped working with no explanation and there was no information in the logs. All these were more difficult when dealing with enhanced fan-out. In fact, we were about to abort the usage of Kinesis due to a misunderstanding with enhanced fan-out.
Read full review The support from the Confluent platform is great and satisfying. We have been working with Confluent for more than a year now. They sent out resident architects to help us set up Confluent cluster on our cloud and help us troubleshoot problems we have encountered. Overall, it has been a great experience working with the Confluent Platform.
Read full review Alternatives Considered The main benefit was around set up - incredibly easy to just start using Kinesis. Kinesis is a real-time data processing platform, while Kafka is more of a message queue system. If you only need a message queue from a limited source, Kafka may do the job. More complex use cases, with low latency, higher volume of data, real time decisions and integration with multiple sources and destination at a decent price, Kinesis is better.
Read full review For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others scale options and cost to run it was more than financially viable as a platform solution to our global operations.
Read full review Return on Investment Caused us to need to re-engineer some basic re-try logic Caused us to drop some content without knowing it Made monitoring much more difficult We eventually switched back to SQS because Kinesis is not the same as a Queue system Read full review It enables us to develop event driven application. It increases our ability to handle streaming data. It reduces latency of communication. Read full review ScreenShots