Amazon Kinesis vs. Confluent

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon Kinesis
Score 8.0 out of 10
N/A
Amazon Kinesis is a streaming analytics suite for data intake from video or other disparate sources and applying analytics for machine learning (ML) and business intelligence.
$0.01
per GB data ingested / consumed
Confluent
Score 7.4 out of 10
N/A
Confluent Cloud is a cloud-native service for Apache Kafka used to connect and process data in real time with a fully managed data streaming platform. Confluent Platform is the self-managed version.N/A
Pricing
Amazon KinesisConfluent
Editions & Modules
Amazon Kinesis Video Streams
$0.00850
per GB data ingested / consumed
Amazon Kinesis Data Streams
$0.04
per hour per stream
Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics
$0.11
per hour
Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose
tiered pricing starting at $0.029
per month first 500 TB ingested
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon KinesisConfluent
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Features
Amazon KinesisConfluent
Streaming Analytics
Comparison of Streaming Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Amazon Kinesis
8.3
2 Ratings
3% above category average
Confluent
9.1
2 Ratings
12% above category average
Real-Time Data Analysis10.01 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Data Ingestion from Multiple Data Sources9.02 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Low Latency9.02 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Integrated Development Tools9.02 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Data wrangling and preparation10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Linear Scale-Out6.12 Ratings9.02 Ratings
Data Enrichment5.01 Ratings10.01 Ratings
Visualization Dashboards00 Ratings8.02 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon KinesisConfluent
Small Businesses
IBM Streams
IBM Streams
Score 9.0 out of 10
IBM Streams
IBM Streams
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Confluent
Confluent
Score 7.4 out of 10
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Tealium Customer Data Hub
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Spotfire Streaming
Spotfire Streaming
Score 8.1 out of 10
Spotfire Streaming
Spotfire Streaming
Score 8.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon KinesisConfluent
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(3 ratings)
10.0
(2 ratings)
Support Rating
7.1
(2 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon KinesisConfluent
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
Amazon Kinesis is a great replacement for Kafka and it works better whenever the components of the solution are AWS based. Best if extended fan-out is not required, but still price-performance ratio is very good for simplifying maintenance.
I would go with a different option if the systems to be connected are legacy, for instance in the case of traditional messaging clients.
Read full review
Confluent
If you have a need to stream data, real time or segmented structured data then Confluent is a great platform to do so with. You won't run into packet transfer size limitations that other platforms have. Flexibility in on-prem, cloud, and managed cloud offerings makes it very flexible no matter how you choose to implement.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • Processing huge loads of data
  • Integrating well with IoT Platform on Amazon
  • Integration with overall AWS Ecosystem
  • Scalability
Read full review
Confluent
  • Products work great.
  • Training is available.
  • Customer support is good.
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • Not a queue system, so little visibility into "backlog" if there is any
  • Confusing terminology to make sure events aren't missed
  • Sometimes didn't seem to trigger Lambda functions, or dropped events when a lot came in
Read full review
Confluent
  • Cloud based Azure platform features for Confluent lacks behind AWS And GCP
Read full review
Support Rating
Amazon AWS
The documentation was confusing and lacked examples. The streams suddenly stopped working with no explanation and there was no information in the logs. All these were more difficult when dealing with enhanced fan-out. In fact, we were about to abort the usage of Kinesis due to a misunderstanding with enhanced fan-out.
Read full review
Confluent
The support from the Confluent platform is great and satisfying. We have been working with Confluent for more than a year now. They sent out resident architects to help us set up Confluent cluster on our cloud and help us troubleshoot problems we have encountered. Overall, it has been a great experience working with the Confluent Platform.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
The main benefit was around set up - incredibly easy to just start using Kinesis. Kinesis is a real-time data processing platform, while Kafka is more of a message queue system. If you only need a message queue from a limited source, Kafka may do the job. More complex use cases, with low latency, higher volume of data, real time decisions and integration with multiple sources and destination at a decent price, Kinesis is better.
Read full review
Confluent
For our use case it was very important that the technology we were working with fit into our Azure architecture, and met our data processing size requirements to stream data within certain SLAs. Confluent more than met our performance requirements and compared to the others scale options and cost to run it was more than financially viable as a platform solution to our global operations.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • Caused us to need to re-engineer some basic re-try logic
  • Caused us to drop some content without knowing it
  • Made monitoring much more difficult
  • We eventually switched back to SQS because Kinesis is not the same as a Queue system
Read full review
Confluent
  • It enables us to develop event driven application.
  • It increases our ability to handle streaming data.
  • It reduces latency of communication.
Read full review
ScreenShots