Amazon S3 Glacier vs. Infrascale Platform

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Amazon S3 Glacier
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
The Amazon S3 Glacier storage classes are purpose-built for data archiving, providing a low cost archive storage in the cloud. According to AWS, S3 Glacier storage classes provide virtually unlimited scalability and are designed for 99.999999999% (11 nines) of data durability, and they provide fast access to archive data and low cost.
$0
Per GB Per Month
Infrascale Platform
Score 9.5 out of 10
N/A
The Infrascale Platform is the flagship cloud storage, data protection, and disaster recovery platform from the California based company, Infrascale.N/A
Pricing
Amazon S3 GlacierInfrascale Platform
Editions & Modules
Bulk Retrieval Pricing
$0.0025
Per GB Per Month
Storage Pricing
$0.004
Per GB Per Month
Retrieval Pricing
$0.01
Per GB Per Month
Expedited Retrieval Pricing
$0.03
Per GB Per Month
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Amazon S3 GlacierInfrascale Platform
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Amazon S3 GlacierInfrascale Platform
Top Pros
Top Cons
Features
Amazon S3 GlacierInfrascale Platform
Data Center Backup
Comparison of Data Center Backup features of Product A and Product B
Amazon S3 Glacier
-
Ratings
Infrascale Platform
9.7
3 Ratings
17% above category average
Universal recovery00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Instant recovery00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Recovery verification00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
Business application protection00 Ratings8.92 Ratings
Multiple backup destinations00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Incremental backup identification00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Backup to the cloud00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Deduplication and file compression00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Snapshots00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Flexible deployment00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Management dashboard00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Platform support00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Retention options00 Ratings10.03 Ratings
Encryption00 Ratings9.82 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Amazon S3 GlacierInfrascale Platform
Small Businesses
AppRiver from OpenText
AppRiver from OpenText
Score 9.1 out of 10
NAKIVO Backup & Replication
NAKIVO Backup & Replication
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
AppRiver from OpenText
AppRiver from OpenText
Score 9.1 out of 10
Cohesity DataProtect
Cohesity DataProtect
Score 9.3 out of 10
Enterprises
Microsoft Exchange
Microsoft Exchange
Score 8.7 out of 10
Cohesity DataProtect
Cohesity DataProtect
Score 9.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Amazon S3 GlacierInfrascale Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(7 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
6.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Amazon S3 GlacierInfrascale Platform
Likelihood to Recommend
Amazon AWS
If your organization has a lot of archival data that it needs to be backed up for safekeeping, where it won't be touched except in a dire emergency, Amazon Glacier is perfect. In our case, we had a client that generates many TB of video and photo data at annual events and wanted to retain ALL of it, pre- and post- edit for potential use in a future museum. Using the Snowball device, we were able to move hundreds of TB of existing media data that was previously housed on multiple Thunderbolt drives, external RAIDs, etc, in an organized manner, to Amazon Glacier. Then, we were able to setup CloudBerry Backup on their production computers to continually backup any new media that they generated during their annual events.
Read full review
Infrascale
The Infrascale Platform solution we have in place is certainly not cheap - I believe we are paying about $2800/month for it, though it is quite robust. We have 18TB of on-site storage available, with the same available in a secondary - remote - device for replication. They do have a wide range of products available to any size business though, so I'm sure they have cheaper offerings as well. The on-site appliance is fantastic - in that in houses your backups, but can also be utilized as an emergency piece of hardware to spin up a backup and run it in the event of your primary hardware failing. You can also traverse full backups to grab single, contained, files if you so choose. We love that feature as we must perform file recovery monthly for audit purposes.
Read full review
Pros
Amazon AWS
  • Cheap storage of backup data.
  • Can be used as a part of the entire suite of tools from Amazon, without requiring you to leave the familiar stack.
Read full review
Infrascale
  • Makes consistent, verifiable onsite backups of our corporate data.
  • Makes consistent, verifiable offsite backups of our corporate data
  • Plays very nice with VMware, the infrastructure we currently use
Read full review
Cons
Amazon AWS
  • Accessing data stored in Glacier is slow. That shouldn't be a surprise, but it is undesirable nonetheless.
  • Retrieving a large amount of data can be expensive; Glacier's intended use is as an archive of rarely-accessed data.
  • Some users regard Glacier with fear and uncertainty. Slow retrieval time and high retrieval cost are the greatest risks of using Glacier, and they are also the Glacier interaction that most users have the least experience with.
Read full review
Infrascale
  • More expensive than Backblaze
Read full review
Usability
Amazon AWS
It is difficult to delete the data as you have to wait for inventory and then bucket modification has to expire.
Read full review
Infrascale
It is one of the best cloud back up data protection software and software platforms on the entire market for MSPs. There are not many other solutions that offer this level of customization and execution in the data protection and disaster recovery arena better than Infrascale. I highly recommend it for any MSP.
Read full review
Support Rating
Amazon AWS
No answers on this topic
Infrascale
It is the cheapest way to truly protect data and has an amazing support team behind the product. You get what you pay for.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Amazon AWS
Since the rest of our infrastructure is in Amazon AWS, coding for sending data to Glacier just makes sense. The others are great as well, for their specific needs and uses, but having *another* third-party software to manage, be billed for, and learn/utilize can be costly in money and time.
Read full review
Infrascale
Infrascale Platform is the most modern backup service/device we've utilized. EaseUs and Ghost were just software that would run within a Windows environment (at the time) and backup to a device that we kept on-site. EaseUs would fail quite often with Incremental backups - so I would spend a lot of time re-running full backups to ensure we didn't experience data loss in the event of a crash. Ghost was used when I was first hired at this district - so I didn't have much hands-on experience with it. But I know it was a bundled offering with Anti-Virus back when we utilized it ('07-'09ish).
Read full review
Return on Investment
Amazon AWS
  • Helped us meet compliance requirements while minimizing costs.
  • Simple integration with almost no changes required to our existing S3 management policies.
Read full review
Infrascale
  • Peace of mind: our entire virtual environment is backed up both onsite and offsite
  • As stated, it is pricey. Since we haven't needed to do anything more than basic file restores, ROI is hard to measure. A full restore of a virtual server immediately would be priceless. So, on that note, ROI is good.
Read full review
ScreenShots