Anypoint Platform vs Azuqua

• The Anypoint Exchange where there are huge number of connectors to connect to n number of external applications.
• The API management stuff, securing and deploying a API(webservice) via client id and client secret.
• The various policies that we can use to restrict access to our API like rate limiting, Quota etc.

Read full review

• The best part about Azuqua is that you do not need to write code. You do however need to have an understanding of logic and how the software works. This happens to fit me perfectly as someone with basic programming experience.
• Their Support is second to none. Not only are they extremely quick and responsive, but their answers are never canned responses and always provide valuable content.
• They seem to take feedback seriously and will continue to evolve and make a better product.

Read full review

• Responsive IDE. More likely they need to improve the IDE as it lags whenever you are working with 20-30 APIs in a package.

Read full review

• The lack of connection/card documentation. Every card does have a section with details, but they are sometimes lacking.
• The help center and community also need some structuring work. Every single connection/app should have a section with detailed documentation regarding its triggers and actions.
• The FLO history section needs to be more refined. It sometimes does not load and choosing the date doesn't actually show execution results from that particular day.

Read full review

• Very expensive Enterprise Licence cost.
• MuleSoft Anypoint Platformon cloud is very quick to set up (it is not intended for internal use).
• DataWeave is very powerful to do transformations.
• Many native connectors are available (Salesforce...).

Read full review

• scaling processes
• time savings from manual entry
• creative thinking for process solutions

Read full review