Likelihood to Recommend if you're doing joins from hBASE, hdfs, cassandra and redis, then this works. Using it as a be all end all does not suit it. This is not your straight forward magic software that works for all scenarios. One needs to determine the use case to see if Apache Drill fits the needs. 3/4 of the time, usually it does.
Read full review If you need a managed big data megastore, which has native integration with highly optimized
Apache Spark Engine and native integration with MLflow, go for Databricks Lakehouse Platform. The Databricks Lakehouse Platform is a breeze to use and analytics capabilities are supported out of the box. You will find it a bit difficult to manage code in notebooks but you will get used to it soon.
Read full review Pros queries multiple data sources with ease. supports sql, so non technical users who know sql, can run query sets 3rd party tools, like tableau, zoom data and looker were able to connect with no issues Read full review Process raw data in One Lake (S3) env to relational tables and views Share notebooks with our business analysts so that they can use the queries and generate value out of the data Try out PySpark and Spark SQL queries on raw data before using them in our Spark jobs Modern day ETL operations made easy using Databricks. Provide access mechanism for different set of customers Read full review Cons deployment. Not as easy configuration isn't as straight forward, especially with the documentation Garbage collection could be improved upon Read full review Connect my local code in Visual code to my Databricks Lakehouse Platform cluster so I can run the code on the cluster. The old databricks-connect approach has many bugs and is hard to set up. The new Databricks Lakehouse Platform extension on Visual Code, doesn't allow the developers to debug their code line by line (only we can run the code). Maybe have a specific Databricks Lakehouse Platform IDE that can be used by Databricks Lakehouse Platform users to develop locally. Visualization in MLFLOW experiment can be enhanced Read full review Likelihood to Renew if Presto comes up with more support (ie hbase, s3), then its strongly possible that we'll move from apache drill to prestoDB. However, Apache drill needs more configuration ease, especially when it comes to garbage collection tuning. If apache drill could support also sparkSQL and
Flume , then it does change drill into being something more valuable than prestoDB
Read full review Usability Because it is an amazing platform for designing experiments and delivering a deep dive analysis that requires execution of highly complex queries, as well as it allows to share the information and insights across the company with their shared workspaces, while keeping it secured. in terms of graph generation and interaction it could improve their UI and UX
Read full review Support Rating One of the best customer and technology support that I have ever experienced in my career. You pay for what you get and you get the Rolls Royce. It reminds me of the customer support of SAS in the 2000s when the tools were reaching some limits and their engineer wanted to know more about what we were doing, long before "data science" was even a name. Databricks truly embraces the partnership with their customer and help them on any given challenge.
Read full review Alternatives Considered compared to presto, has more support than prestodb. Impala has limitations to what drill can support apache phoenix only supports for hbase. no support for cassandra. Apache drill was chosen, because of the multiple data stores that it supports htat the other 3 do not support. Presto does not support hbase as of yet. Impala does not support query to cassandra
Read full review Compared to
Synapse &
Snowflake , Databricks provides a much better development experience, and deeper configuration capabilities. It works out-of-the-box but still allows you intricate customisation of the environment. I find Databricks very flexible and resilient at the same time while
Synapse and
Snowflake feel more limited in terms of configuration and connectivity to external tools.
Read full review Return on Investment Configuration has taken some serious time out. Garbage collection tuning. is a constant hassle. time and effort applied to it, vs dedicating resources elsewhere. w/ sql support, reduces the need of devs to generate the resultset for analysts, when they can run queries themselves (if they know sql). Read full review The ability to spin up a BIG Data platform with little infrastructure overhead allows us to focus on business value not admin DB has the ability to terminate/time out instances which helps manage cost. The ability to quickly access typical hard to build data scenarios easily is a strength. Read full review ScreenShots