Apache Flink vs. Elecard StreamEye Studio

Apache Flink

5 Reviews and Ratings

Elecard StreamEye Studio

Elecard StreamEye Studio

1 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Apache Flink	Score 9.2 out of 10	N/A	Apache Flink is a framework and distributed processing engine for stateful computations over unbounded and bounded data streams. Flink has been designed to run in all common cluster environments, perform computations at in-memory speed and at any scale. And FlinkCEP is the Complex Event Processing (CEP) library implemented on top of Flink. Users can detect event patterns in streams of events.	N/A
Elecard StreamEye Studio	Score 9.1 out of 10	Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)	Elecard StreamEye - a software tool for professionals in the video compression field. It enables in-depth bitstream analysis to macroblock level, codec parameters inspection. MPEG-1, MPEG-2, AVC/H.264, HEVC/H.265, AV1, VP9, VVC (preview version). Finding an issue in the elementary stream that may cause errors at the decoder. Analyze bitrate and buffer deviations. Check the stream versus compliance standard. Calculate overall stream quality with a help of different objective and subjective…	$0

Pricing

Apache Flink

Elecard StreamEye Studio

Editions & Modules

No answers on this topic

per seat license: $0
floating license: $0

Offerings

Pricing Offerings
Apache Flink	Elecard StreamEye Studio
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No	No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	Yes

Entry-level Setup Fee

No setup fee

No setup fee

Additional Details

—

—

More Pricing Information

Community Pulse
	Apache Flink	Elecard StreamEye Studio
Top Pros	Pro Blog posts Pro Case studies Pro Easier to deploy	No answers on this topic
Top Cons	Minus Open source Minus Source system Minus Data analytics	No answers on this topic

Features

Apache Flink

Elecard StreamEye Studio

Streaming Analytics

Comparison of Streaming Analytics features of Product A and Product B
	Apache Flink 8.7 1 Ratings 7% above category average	Elecard StreamEye Studio 9.1 1 Ratings 12% above category average
Real-Time Data Analysis	10.01 Ratings	9.11 Ratings
Data Ingestion from Multiple Data Sources	7.01 Ratings	00 Ratings
Low Latency	10.01 Ratings	9.11 Ratings
Data wrangling and preparation	6.01 Ratings	00 Ratings
Linear Scale-Out	9.01 Ratings	00 Ratings
Data Enrichment	10.01 Ratings	00 Ratings
Visualization Dashboards	00 Ratings	9.11 Ratings

Best Alternatives
	Apache Flink	Elecard StreamEye Studio
Small Businesses	IBM Streams Score 9.0 out of 10	IBM Streams Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Confluent Score 7.4 out of 10	Confluent Score 7.4 out of 10
Enterprises	Spotfire Streaming Score 8.1 out of 10	Spotfire Streaming Score 8.1 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Apache Flink	Elecard StreamEye Studio
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (1 ratings)	9.1 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Apache Flink	Elecard StreamEye Studio
Likelihood to Recommend	Apache In well-suited scenarios, I would recommend using Apache Flink when you need to perform real-time analytics on streaming data, such as monitoring user activities, analyzing IoT device data, or processing financial transactions in real-time. It is also a good choice in scenarios where fault tolerance and consistency are crucial. I would not recommend it for simple batch processing pipelines or for teams that aren't experienced, as it might be overkill, and the steep learning curve may not justify the investment. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Elecard Any scenarios wherein a video stream is required to be analyzed specifically h264 streams. Incentivized Huzaifa Najmi President Read full review
Pros	Apache Low latency Stream Processing, enabling real-time analytics Scalability, due its great parallel capabilities Stateful Processing, providing several built-in fault tolerance systems Flexibility, supporting both batch and stream processing Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Elecard Bit Rate analysis specifically when Iframes are taking more bits and starving frames of bits. Incentivized Huzaifa Najmi President Read full review
Cons	Apache Python/SQL API, since both are relatively new, still misses a few features in comparison with the Java/Scala option Steep Learning Curve, it's documentation could be improved to something more user-friendly, and it could also discuss more theoretical concepts than just coding Community smaller than other frameworks Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Elecard No issues found so far Incentivized Huzaifa Najmi President Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Apache Apache Spark is more user-friendly and features higher-level APIs. However, it was initially built for batch processing and only more recently gained streaming capabilities. In contrast, Apache Flink processes streaming data natively. Therefore, in terms of low latency and fault tolerance, Apache Flink takes the lead. However, Spark has a larger community and a decidedly lower learning curve. Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Elecard No answers on this topic
Return on Investment	Apache Allowed for real-time data recovery, adding significant value to the busines Enabled us to create new internal tools that we couldn't find in the market, becoming a strategic asset for the business Enhanced the overall technical capability of the team Incentivized Verified User Anonymous Read full review	Elecard No answers on this topic
ScreenShots		Elecard StreamEye Studio Screenshots