Apache Geode vs. Arcserve UDP

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Geode
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Apache Geode is a distributed in-memory database designed to support low latency, high concurrency solutions, available free and open source since 2002. With it, users can build high-speed, data-intensive applications that elastically meet performance requirements. Apache Geode blends techniques for data replication, partitioning and distributed processing.N/A
Arcserve UDP
Score 6.7 out of 10
N/A
Arcserve Unified Data Protection (UDP) is designed to future-proof infrastructure by delivering data protection and disaster recovery for every type of workload. Backed by heterogeneous, image-based technology that protects to and from any target, the vendor boasts combining enterprise-ready features without the complexity of traditional enterprise solutions. Arcserve UDP supercedes the former Zetta DataProtect backup and recovery solution from Zetta.net, acquired by Arcserve July…N/A
Pricing
Apache GeodeArcserve UDP
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache GeodeArcserve UDP
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details——
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache GeodeArcserve UDP
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Apache GeodeArcserve UDP
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
Apache Geode
8.7
1 Ratings
1% below category average
Arcserve UDP
-
Ratings
Performance9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Concurrency10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Data model flexibility7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache GeodeArcserve UDP
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.0 out of 10
Paubox Email Suite
Paubox Email Suite
Score 10.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.0 out of 10
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.0 out of 10
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
Druva Data Resiliency Cloud
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache GeodeArcserve UDP
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
8.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(1 ratings)
9.9
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache GeodeArcserve UDP
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
The biggest advantage of using Apache Geode is DB like consistency. So for applications whose data needs to be in-memory, accessible at low latencies and most importantly writes have to be consistent, should use Apache Geode. For our application quite some amount of data is static which we store in MySQL as it can be easily manipulated. But since this data is large R/w from DB becomes expensive. So we started using Redis. Redis does a brilliant job, but with complex data structures and no query like capability, we have to manage it via code. We are experimenting with Apache Geode and it looks promising as now we can query on complex data-structures and get the required data quickly and also updates consistent.
Read full review
Arcserve
If I were speaking to a fellow Managed Service Provider, I would likely NOT recommend this product. There are simply too many other tools out there that are better hitting this particular market. And the pain points that we do have with them are especially difficult because of our business model. However in speaking to pretty much anyone else in IT/Disaster Recovery this is an enterprise tool built to handle anything you throw at it. UNC paths and linking backup servers to one another, the flexibility of the tool allows for maximum cost savings if you build it right.
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • Super Fast data pull/push
  • Provided ACID transactions, so it works like a SQL Database
  • Provides replication & partitioning, so our data is never lost and extraction is super fast. NoSql like properties
Read full review
Arcserve
  • It is reliable and once it is up and running you do not need to worry about it.
  • It is flexible; you can use it to backup on-prem or in the cloud.
  • Backup and DR
Read full review
Cons
Apache
  • Needs more supporting languages. Out of box Python, Nodejs adapters would be wonderful
  • Currently it supports just KV Store. But if we could cache documents or timeseries data would be great
  • Needs more community support, documentation.
Read full review
Arcserve
  • Notifications - on the odd occasion something doesn't work, I get way too many email notifications!
  • Explanation of issues - sometimes when there is a problem, the explanation is a bit lacking in the logs as to why
  • Flagging of errors - sometimes minor errors just get a warning flag, and it doesn't really notify you that they are there.
Read full review
Usability
Apache
Still Experimenting. Initial results are good. we need to figure out if we can completely replace Redis. Cost wise if it makes sense to keep both or replacement is feasible.
Read full review
Arcserve
It works great in our infrastructure, we have reduced the risk of losing information at a lower TCO compared to other solutions. The implementation process was precise and fast and upgrades have always been smooth. It delivers what it promises.
Read full review
Support Rating
Apache
Never contacted support
Read full review
Arcserve
Pretty good--I haven't actually had to call them much so it's hard to say. The box works well enough and most of my issues have been related to the rest of my network, rather than the appliance itself.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache
Still Experimenting. But looks promising as it has query capabilities over complex data structures
Read full review
Arcserve
Arcserve [UDP] has stood the test of time due to its low cost-to-feature value proposition for our company. We have ultimately decided to move to a more MSP-friendly product in N-Able Backup, but Arcserve [UDP] kept us around for years with their reliable and inexpensive product that delivered above and beyond technologically of their competitors throughout all that time.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
  • Still experimenting so difficult to quote
  • For a small size project/teams might be an overkill as it still has certain learning curve
  • For Medium to large projects with complex Data Structures that need to be queried with a fast o/p it definitely works
Read full review
Arcserve
  • We have been able to keep our clients' costs low and add advanced features with no additional overhead for us in licensing.
  • It does however cost us a significant amount of additional technician time to review backups each day compared to other products aimed in our vertical.
Read full review
ScreenShots