Apache Geode vs. Dell RecoverPoint

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Geode
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Apache Geode is a distributed in-memory database designed to support low latency, high concurrency solutions, available free and open source since 2002. With it, users can build high-speed, data-intensive applications that elastically meet performance requirements. Apache Geode blends techniques for data replication, partitioning and distributed processing.N/A
Dell RecoverPoint
Score 7.5 out of 10
N/A
Dell RecoverPoint replication provides the continuous data protection to recover any application, on any supported storage array, in any location, to any point in time. Users can meet recovery point objectives (RPOs) and recovery time objectives (RTOs) with instant access to data, and use RecoverPoint to support disaster recovery, operational recovery, and testing.N/A
Pricing
Apache GeodeDell RecoverPoint
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache GeodeDell RecoverPoint
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache GeodeDell RecoverPoint
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Apache GeodeDell RecoverPoint
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
Apache Geode
8.7
1 Ratings
1% below category average
Dell RecoverPoint
-
Ratings
Performance9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Availability10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Concurrency10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Scalability8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Data model flexibility7.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache GeodeDell RecoverPoint
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.1 out of 10
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Hornetsecurity VM Backup
Score 8.4 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.1 out of 10
Cohesity
Cohesity
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.1 out of 10
Cohesity
Cohesity
Score 8.5 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache GeodeDell RecoverPoint
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
7.5
(5 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(1 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache GeodeDell RecoverPoint
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
The biggest advantage of using Apache Geode is DB like consistency. So for applications whose data needs to be in-memory, accessible at low latencies and most importantly writes have to be consistent, should use Apache Geode. For our application quite some amount of data is static which we store in MySQL as it can be easily manipulated. But since this data is large R/w from DB becomes expensive. So we started using Redis. Redis does a brilliant job, but with complex data structures and no query like capability, we have to manage it via code. We are experimenting with Apache Geode and it looks promising as now we can query on complex data-structures and get the required data quickly and also updates consistent.
Read full review
Dell Technologies
It is well suited if your whole environment is virtualized to integration with vmware SRM for automation. It isn't suited if you are not using a fibre channel switch network and could get expensive if you have a lot of storage to replicate.
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • Super Fast data pull/push
  • Provided ACID transactions, so it works like a SQL Database
  • Provides replication & partitioning, so our data is never lost and extraction is super fast. NoSql like properties
Read full review
Dell Technologies
  • Automatically discover and register VMware ESXi hosts for replication.
  • Auto-registers shared datastores , pre-defined failover Network Configuration. EMC RecoverPoint saved a lot of time and helped our team to minimize our disaster recovery window.
Read full review
Cons
Apache
  • Needs more supporting languages. Out of box Python, Nodejs adapters would be wonderful
  • Currently it supports just KV Store. But if we could cache documents or timeseries data would be great
  • Needs more community support, documentation.
Read full review
Dell Technologies
  • User interface
  • Pricing
  • Local support
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Apache
No answers on this topic
Dell Technologies
EMC been good to use as of now.
Read full review
Usability
Apache
Still Experimenting. Initial results are good. we need to figure out if we can completely replace Redis. Cost wise if it makes sense to keep both or replacement is feasible.
Read full review
Dell Technologies
Product is easy to use with details what is replicated and you can easily tag your datastores
Read full review
Support Rating
Apache
Never contacted support
Read full review
Dell Technologies
I don't really have to call support too much, but when I have to they are always there to help.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache
Still Experimenting. But looks promising as it has query capabilities over complex data structures
Read full review
Dell Technologies
Zerto was selected to compete against recoverpoint.. Zerto was a virtual solution that doesn't work for physical solutions. Recoverpoint was chosen over Zerto because of the need to replicate and protect physical systems, versus just VMs. Zerto is under strong consideration as the environment is becoming more virtualize through the next few months.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
  • Still experimenting so difficult to quote
  • For a small size project/teams might be an overkill as it still has certain learning curve
  • For Medium to large projects with complex Data Structures that need to be queried with a fast o/p it definitely works
Read full review
Dell Technologies
  • Dell EMC RecoverPoint requires certain things to be implemented that can only be done by EMC / Dell support.
Read full review
ScreenShots