Apache Geode vs. Scylla

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Geode
Score 7.0 out of 10
N/A
Apache Geode is a distributed in-memory database designed to support low latency, high concurrency solutions, available free and open source since 2002. With it, users can build high-speed, data-intensive applications that elastically meet performance requirements. Apache Geode blends techniques for data replication, partitioning and distributed processing.N/A
Scylla
Score 9.1 out of 10
N/A
ScyllaDB headquartered in Palo Alto offers Scylla, a NoSQL database alternative to Apache Cassandra available in Enterprise and Cloud DBaaS editions.N/A
Pricing
Apache GeodeScylla
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache GeodeScylla
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoYes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache GeodeScylla
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Apache GeodeScylla
NoSQL Databases
Comparison of NoSQL Databases features of Product A and Product B
Apache Geode
8.7
1 Ratings
1% below category average
Scylla
8.4
1 Ratings
5% below category average
Performance9.01 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Availability10.01 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Concurrency10.01 Ratings9.11 Ratings
Scalability8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Data model flexibility7.01 Ratings6.41 Ratings
Deployment model flexibility8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Apache GeodeScylla
Small Businesses
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.0 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.0 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.0 out of 10
Enterprises
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.0 out of 10
IBM Cloudant
IBM Cloudant
Score 8.0 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache GeodeScylla
Likelihood to Recommend
7.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(1 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache GeodeScylla
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
The biggest advantage of using Apache Geode is DB like consistency. So for applications whose data needs to be in-memory, accessible at low latencies and most importantly writes have to be consistent, should use Apache Geode. For our application quite some amount of data is static which we store in MySQL as it can be easily manipulated. But since this data is large R/w from DB becomes expensive. So we started using Redis. Redis does a brilliant job, but with complex data structures and no query like capability, we have to manage it via code. We are experimenting with Apache Geode and it looks promising as now we can query on complex data-structures and get the required data quickly and also updates consistent.
Read full review
ScyllaDB
Scylla is well suited for high-throughput scenarios where keyed data must be read or written with consistently low latency. It's less appropriate for use cases requiring relational queries, secondary indexes, or more structured data sets.
Read full review
Pros
Apache
  • Super Fast data pull/push
  • Provided ACID transactions, so it works like a SQL Database
  • Provides replication & partitioning, so our data is never lost and extraction is super fast. NoSql like properties
Read full review
ScyllaDB
  • Low-latency reads
  • CQL has a familiar syntax
  • Parity with Cassandra
  • Practical features
Read full review
Cons
Apache
  • Needs more supporting languages. Out of box Python, Nodejs adapters would be wonderful
  • Currently it supports just KV Store. But if we could cache documents or timeseries data would be great
  • Needs more community support, documentation.
Read full review
ScyllaDB
  • Better documentation for best practices (e.g., how to effectively use connection pooling)
Read full review
Usability
Apache
Still Experimenting. Initial results are good. we need to figure out if we can completely replace Redis. Cost wise if it makes sense to keep both or replacement is feasible.
Read full review
ScyllaDB
Very easy-to-understand syntax--uses CQL (same as Cassandra), which has many similarities to standard SQL. There are some gotchas, however, that must be known during schema development.
Read full review
Support Rating
Apache
Never contacted support
Read full review
ScyllaDB
The Scylla cloud support team is incredibly responsive and proactive.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache
Still Experimenting. But looks promising as it has query capabilities over complex data structures
Read full review
ScyllaDB
Scylla has a quick learning curve (same as Cassandra) compared to other proprietary solutions like BigTable. It supports higher throughput and lower latency that other NoSQL databases like MongoDB, which sacrifice those features for more flexibility and unique features.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
  • Still experimenting so difficult to quote
  • For a small size project/teams might be an overkill as it still has certain learning curve
  • For Medium to large projects with complex Data Structures that need to be queried with a fast o/p it definitely works
Read full review
ScyllaDB
  • Addresses latency requirements of our platform
Read full review
ScreenShots