98 Reviews and Ratings
46 Reviews and Ratings
No answers on this topic
As I mentioned earlier, the Apache HTTP Server has a small disadvantage compared to the competition (NGINX) in terms of performance. If you run websites that really have a lot of visitors, NGINX might be the better alternative. On the other hand, the Apache HTTP Server is open source and free. Further functionalities can be activated via modules. The documentation is really excellent.Incentivized
I think normally, in my day-to-day, I have to navigate multiple screens or reach max GUI sessions fast, a multi-tab, or a way not to lose or manage multiple views. This would help me, as a dev/tester, navigate through processes faster.Incentivized
Street Cred: Apache Web Server is the Founder for all of Apache Foundation's other projects. Without the Web Server, Apache Foundation would look very different. That being said, they have done a good job of maintaining the code base, and keeping a lot of what makes Apache so specialStability: Apache is rock-solid. While no software is perfect, Apache can parse your web sources quickly and cleanly.Flexibility: Need to startup your own Webpage? Done. Wordpress? Yup. REST Endpoint? Check. Honeypot? Absolutely.Incentivized
Provide reliable information about the shipments.Gain visibility of the material a long of the supply chain.Monitor the carrier performance.Incentivized
The default configurations which comes with Apache server needs to get optimized for performance and security with every new installation as these defaults are not recommended to push on the production environment directly.Security options and advanced configurations are not easy to set up and require an additional level of expertise.Admin frontend GUI could be improved to a great extent to match with other enterprise tools available to serve similar requirements.Incentivized
Program can not be easily manipulated to make results false.Customization is very costly and limited.Difficult to handle large amount of data.Incentivized
I give this rating because there is so much Apache documentation and information on the web that you can literally do anything. This has to do with the fact that there is a huge Open Source community that is beyond mature and perhaps one of the most helpful to be found. The only thing that should hold anyone back from anything is that they can not read. RTFM, my friend. And I must say that the manual is excellent.Incentivized
I has a lot more features, except that IIS is more integrated in a Windows environment. But now with .net core also possible from Apache it would work anywhere really. Only in a full Windows environment where full integration is needed I would chose to go for IIS. Otherwise Apache it is.Incentivized
SAP Enterprise Portal has a very similar feature set to other systems, but the interface is simple and the cost is reasonable. We had quotes provided from Salesforce and other providers, but they did not meet out budgetary requirements or offer features that were different enough to warrant the extra cost. SAP fit the bill for us.Incentivized
Works as intended, so it's less to worry about.Works great on elastic environments (like EC2).As an Open Source project, you can get support for almost any problem you can have.Configuration files, while powerful, can be tricky to dominate for some.Incentivized
Lower cost of implementation.Is the best for inventory management that allows you to know the real state of your material.Mobile application for SAP B1 is beneficial for approvals on the road and no need to be present on a system.Incentivized