Apache Maven vs Gradle

• Makes the build process simple and easy to do.
• It provides a standard build system that can be adopted by multiple, different groups within an organization.
• It's extensible with easy to use custom extensions which our developers take full advantage of.

Read full review

• Build Cache - Enables quick build on dev machines
• Supports multi project builds - enabling modular architecture
• Customizable build tasks
• Support for multiple JVM languages

Read full review

• Maven provides a very rigid model that makes customization tedious and sometimes impossible. While this can make it easier to understand any given Maven build, as long as you don’t have any special requirements, it also makes it unsuitable for many automation problems.
• Maven has few, built-in dependency scopes, which forces awkward module architectures in common scenarios like using test fixtures or code generation. There is no separation between unit and integration tests

Read full review

• Still under development, not as mature as Maven
• Build files aren't as easy to follow because they are so loose
• The community isn't as large as Maven

Read full review

• Apache Maven is an open source product from the Apache Software Foundation. Being free to use without any licensing constraints, we've been very happy with this product thus far.
• The software build and packaging times for our applications have improved greatly since our use of this tool.

Read full review

• In a distributed development environment, once we established a strong CI/CD model, Gradle proved to be a great choice to automate the various processes. Gradle also provides much flexibility, which is essential in today's development environment. The important benefit is that the CI/CD engineers can support development's needs quickly and reliably. This in turn supports faster testing and deployment, which generates higher ROI.

Read full review