Apache Maven vs Gradle

• It's easy to manage the libraries. Just need to update the pom file, you can easily manage and update libraries in one place.
• Good to manage different modules.
• Integrates with Jenkins. Compatible with other open source tools and continuous integration.

Read full review

• Gradle's methods to manipulate files is very flexible. It minimizes the amount of code one has to write to copy, move, or expand zip or tar files.
• Gradle uses Groovy, which is a Java like language. This allows for most computer engineers to come up to speed fairly quickly, for writing or maintaining gradle code.
• Gradle also supports DSL (Domain Specific Language), which is based on Groovy. The DSL language allows engineers to automate build jobs that otherwise could be very cumbersome to maintain or modify.

Read full review

• One of the issues with building software using Apache Maven is that its cache resolution is not optimal. It pulls down all the artifacts onto the developer's local machine and can sometimes result in conflicts.
• The build process can vary in time and gets progressively longer as the project's complexity increases.

Read full review

• The Gradle documentation is available online, and it is quite comprehensive. However, more real life examples could be useful.

Read full review

• Apache Maven is an open source product from the Apache Software Foundation. Being free to use without any licensing constraints, we've been very happy with this product thus far.
• The software build and packaging times for our applications have improved greatly since our use of this tool.

Read full review

• Less time fixing framework compatibility problems
• Less time when changing frameworks or plug-ins

Read full review