Apache Pulsar vs. IBM Event Streams

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Apache Pulsar
Score 9.8 out of 10
N/A
Apache Pulsar is a cloud-native, distributed messaging and streaming platform originally created at Yahoo! and now an Apache Software Foundation project. It is free and open source, available under the Apache License, version 2.0.N/A
IBM Event Streams
Score 8.5 out of 10
N/A
IBM Event Streams is a high-throughput, fault-tolerant, event streaming solution. Powered by Apache Kafka, it provides access to enterprise data through event streams, enabling businesses to unlock insights from historical data, and identify and take action on situations in real time and at scale.N/A
Pricing
Apache PulsarIBM Event Streams
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Apache PulsarIBM Event Streams
Free Trial
NoYes
Free/Freemium Version
YesNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Apache PulsarIBM Event Streams
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
Apache PulsarIBM Event Streams
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Confluent
Confluent
Score 7.4 out of 10
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 8.4 out of 10
Enterprises
Spotfire Streaming
Spotfire Streaming
Score 8.0 out of 10
Apache Kafka
Apache Kafka
Score 8.4 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Apache PulsarIBM Event Streams
Likelihood to Recommend
-
(0 ratings)
7.9
(15 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(1 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
7.8
(10 ratings)
User Testimonials
Apache PulsarIBM Event Streams
Likelihood to Recommend
Apache
No answers on this topic
IBM
We used it in two cases, and it went pretty good with both. We used it for analytics and logging alongside event-based communication between different tech-stacks. One thing that users need to keep in mind is that it has a limited knowledgebase and will need a good understanding of Kafka to use it efficiently. So choose it carefully and when its needed
Read full review
Pros
Apache
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • It is adaptive and helps us create more engaging experiences on our platforms.
  • The Key metrics dashboard is rich with insights.
Read full review
Cons
Apache
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • Provide Capabilities to connect the Event Streams via REST Proxy.
  • Schema Registry to handle Avro Formats.
  • Provide Kafka Connect Sink & Source Connectors.
Read full review
Usability
Apache
No answers on this topic
IBM
The product was very user friendly and extremely easy to get started with. The documentation is excellent and the free tier makes it very easy to get started with without having to make deep or long term financial commitments.
Read full review
Support Rating
Apache
No answers on this topic
IBM
I met with the support team and they have deep technical and development understanding of the needs and the problems which IBM Event Streams addresses. If you are looking for a product backed by a highly technical support team then IBM Event Streams is probably the best choice. I was specifically impressed by the level of technical understanding my support team demonstrated.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Apache
No answers on this topic
IBM
In Event Streams, applications send data by creating a message and sending it to a topic. To receive messages, applications subscribe to a topic. High availability and reliability. Event Streams offers a highly available and reliable Apache Kafka service running on IBM Cloud. Event Streams. Event Streams stores three replicas of your data to ensure the highest level of resilience across three availability zones.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Apache
No answers on this topic
IBM
  • In using downstreams, the minimal features and the rate of releases were slow, makes us feel that there's no upgrades and other than that there's poor marketing of the product.
  • The adoption around the service is low, requires focused marketing.
  • Lack of visibility into topic depth , Monitoring capabilities
Read full review
ScreenShots