160 Reviews and Ratings
73 Reviews and Ratings
No answers on this topic
Well suited: To most of the local run of datasets and non-prod systems - scalability is not a problem at all. Including data from multiple types of data sources is an added advantage. MLlib is a decently nice built-in library that can be used for most of the ML tasks. Less appropriate: We had to work on a RecSys where the music dataset that we used was around 300+Gb in size. We faced memory-based issues. Few times we also got memory errors. Also the MLlib library does not have support for advanced analytics and deep-learning frameworks support. Understanding the internals of the working of Apache Spark for beginners is highly not possible.Incentivized
This tool fits all kinds of organizations and helps to integrate data between many applications. We can use this tool as data integration is a key feature for all organizations. It is also available in the cloud, which makes the integration more seamless. The firm can opt for the required tools when there are no data integration needs.Incentivized
Rich APIs for data transformation making for very each to transform and prepare data in a distributed environment without worrying about memory issuesFaster in execution times compare to Hadoop and PIG LatinEasy SQL interface to the same data set for people who are comfortable to explore data in a declarative mannerInteroperability between SQL and Scala / Python style of munging dataIncentivized
Talend Data Integration allows us to quickly build data integrations without a tremendous amount of custom coding (some Java and JavaScript knowledge is still required).I like the UI and it's very intuitive. Jobs are visual, allowing the team members to see the flow of the data, without having to read through the Java code that is generated.Dynamically table creation from new source.
Memory management. Very weak on that.PySpark not as robust as scala with spark.spark master HA is needed. Not as HA as it should be.Locality should not be a necessity, but does help improvement. But would prefer no localityIncentivized
Pricing for sure can be the area for improvement.Real time processing is slow as compared to other tools like Abinitio.While developing batches, it crashes a lot. It may be the issue with me, but I wanted to highlight it.Incentivized
Capacity of computing data in cluster and fast speed.
If the team looking to use Apache Spark is not used to debug and tweak settings for jobs to ensure maximum optimizations, it can be frustrating. However, the documentation and the support of the community on the internet can help resolve most issues. Moreover, it is highly configurable and it integrates with different tools (eg: it can be used by dbt core), which increase the scenarios where it can be usedIncentivized
We use Talend Data Integration day in and day out. It is the best and easiest tool to jump on to and use. We can build a basic integration super-fast. We could build basic integrations as fast as within the hour. It is also easy to build transformations and use Java to perform some operations.Incentivized
1. It integrates very well with scala or python. 2. It's very easy to understand SQL interoperability. 3. Apache is way faster than the other competitive technologies. 4. The support from the Apache community is very huge for Spark. 5. Execution times are faster as compared to others. 6. There are a large number of forums available for Apache Spark. 7. The code availability for Apache Spark is simpler and easy to gain access to. 8. Many organizations use Apache Spark, so many solutions are available for existing applications.
Good support, specially when it relates to PROD environment. The support team has access to the product development team. Things are internally escalated to development team if there is a bug encountered. This helps the customer to get quick fix or patch designed for problem exceptions. I have also seen support showing their willingness to help develop custom connector for a newly available cloud based big data solutionIncentivized
Spark in comparison to similar technologies ends up being a one stop shop. You can achieve so much with this one framework instead of having to stitch and weave multiple technologies from the Hadoop stack, all while getting incredibility performance, minimal boilerplate, and getting the ability to write your application in the language of your choosing.Incentivized
In comparison with the other ETLs I used, Talend is more flexible than Data Services (where you cannot create complex commands). It is similar to Datastage speaking about commands and interfaces. It is more user-friendly than ODI, which has a metadata point of view on its own, while Talend is more classic. It has both on-prem and cloud approaches, while Matillion is only cloud-based.Incentivized
Business leaders are able to take data driven decisionsBusiness users are able access to data in near real time now . Before using spark, they had to wait for at least 24 hours for data to be availableBusiness is able come up with new product ideasIncentivized
It’s only been a positive RoI with Talend given we’ve interfaced large datasets between critical on-Prem and cloud-native apps to efficiently run our business operations.40K+ plots data, covering 1K+ crop varieties.3K+ Customer & their credit data, 3K+ product inventory & pricing.Incentivized